"since" vs. "for"

"since" vs. "for"

Hello, everyone!

Since the publication of my previous article, I did not write one for a while, and here I am, with yet another article.

In this article, let’s discuss the difference between SINCE?and?FOR.


Theory:?since?vs.?for

Both?since?and?for?make a reference to time but in significantly different ways, as follows:

  • Since?is used to refer to a?specific point?in time.
  • For?is used to refer to a?duration?of time.

If you haven’t noticed it already, now take a closer look at the opening sentence of this article:

SINCE?the publication of my previous article, I did not write one FOR a while, ….

  • ?The publication of my previous article?refers to a?specific point?in time, and we use?since?to refer to that point.
  • Now, from that point, the time that has lapsed so far constitutes a?duration?of time, and we use?for?to refer to that duration.


Examples and non-examples

Consider the following examples and non-examples to observe how this difference plays out:

Examples

  • I have been a resident of Bangalore?since?2010.?

The year 2010 refers to a?specific point?in time, so the use of?since?is correct.

  • I have been a resident of Bangalore?for?13 years.?

A period of 13 years refers to a?duration?of time, so the use of?for?is correct.

  • The company has not released an update?since?4.9.7, which was released two years ago.?

The release of 4.9.7 refers to a?specific point?in time, so the use of?since?is correct.

Non-examples

  • We have been friends?since?six years.?

A period of six years refers to a?duration?of time, so the use of?for?would have been correct.

  • Users have been happy with the company’s products?since?ages.?

The word?ages?refers to a long period,?duration, of time, so the use of?for?would have been correct.

  • The company has not released an update?since?two years.?

A period of two years refers to a?duration?of time, so the use of?for?would have been correct.


The case of?from?and the other use of?since

I can hear you asking, “But hey, Vijay, what about the word?from? Is it correct or incorrect to use?from?to refer to time?” And here’s the answer:

The same rule that applies to?since?applies to?from, as well: Use?from?to refer to a specific point in time—and not to refer to a duration.

That way, some of the sentences that you considered previously can also be rewritten, using?from, as follows:

  • From?the time of publication of my previous article, I did not write one for a while.?
  • I have been a resident of Bangalore?from?2010.?

Equally so, the following sentences will be incorrect when they use?from?instead of?for:

  • We have been friends?from?six years.?
  • Users have been happy with the company’s products?from?ages.?

And oh, regarding the other use of the word?since, in the sense of?because, you’ll have to wait for another article?for that!


Further learning

To reinforce what you learned from this article?and to pick up on a couple of other nuances related to the use of?since?and?for, check out this?short video.


Test your understanding

To test your understanding of the differences in usage between?since?and?for, try?this short 10-question quiz. If you’ve got a perfect score on that one and find yourself thirsting for more, here’s a slightly longer,?38-question quiz.

Tell me how you fared in the comments section! All the very best!

:)

Paul Stregevsky

Technical Writer at CVP (Customer Value Partners)

1 年

I wonder if the confusion over these two words is more common for some reason in India. Here in America, the only time I hear one use for the other is when someone colloquially greets someone, "I haven't seen you since forever!"

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Vijaykarthik Sathiyamurthy的更多文章

  • Metaphors and mindfulness

    Metaphors and mindfulness

    The mighty metaphor "To be a master of metaphor," Aristotle says in his Poetics, "is the greatest thing by far." And a…

    1 条评论
  • Tautologically superfluous redundancy

    Tautologically superfluous redundancy

    Hi there! It’s time for yet another article on language use. Today, let’s discuss … … REDUNDANCY of expression.

    1 条评论
  • "Same sound"

    "Same sound"

    In this article, let’s discuss … … HOMOPHONES Theory: HOMOPHONES Homophones are words that have identical or similar…

  • Dichinpecshaan chanitichachon

    Dichinpecshaan chanitichachon

    “Hi, I learned from your website that you offer home disinfection and sanitization services. Could you please tell me…

    1 条评论
  • Language use: habitual vs. mindful

    Language use: habitual vs. mindful

    Hello all! Heres 2023, and here I am, with hearty wishes to you for a … … HAPPY NEW YEAR! Habitual vs. mindful Now…

    1 条评论
  • Mathematically speaking …

    Mathematically speaking …

    This article discusses the idea of cognitive dissonance and how students can be distinguished into two kinds on the…

    1 条评论
  • “The first draft of anything …”

    “The first draft of anything …”

    (On the importance of picking the right metaphor) "THE first draft of anything," Ernest Hemingway is said to have…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了