Is Silicon Valley Blowing Its Chances in China?

Is Silicon Valley Blowing Its Chances in China?

As a succession of American juggernauts—eBay, Google, Uber, Airbnb, LinkedIn, Amazon—have tried and failed to win the Chinese market, Western analysts are quick to chalk up their failures to Chinese government controls. They assume that the only reason Chinese companies survive is due to government protectionism that hobbles their American opponents.

In my years of experience working for those American companies and now investing in their Chinese competitors, I’ve found Silicon Valley’s approach to China to be a far more important reason for their failure.

Global vs. Local Markets

American companies treat China like just any other market to check off their global list. They don’t invest the resources, have the patience, or give their Chinese teams the flexibility needed to compete with China’s world-class entrepreneurs. They see the primary job in China as marketing their existing products to Chinese users. In reality, they need to put in real work tailoring their products for Chinese users or building new products from the ground up to meet market demands. Resistance to localization slows down product iteration and makes local teams feel like cogs in a clunky machine.

Restricting Top Talent

Silicon Valley companies also lose out on top talent. With so much opportunity now for growth within Chinese startups, the most ambitious young people join or start local companies. They know that if they join the Chinese team of an American company, that company’s management will forever see them as “local hires,” workers whose utility is limited to their country of birth. They’ll never be given a chance to climb the hierarchy at the Silicon Valley headquarters, instead bumping up against the ceiling of a “country manager” for China.

The most ambitious young people—the ones who want to make a global impact—chafe at those restrictions, choosing to start their own companies or to climb the ranks at one of China’s tech juggernauts. Foreign firms are often left with mild-mannered managers or career salespeople helicoptered in from other countries, people who are more concerned with protecting their salary and stock options than with truly fighting to win the Chinese market. Put those relatively cautious managers up against gladiatorial entrepreneurs who cut their teeth in China’s competitive coliseum, and it’s always the gladiators who will emerge victorious.

Is it too late for Silicon Valley?

While foreign analysts continued to harp on the question of why American companies couldn’t win in China, Chinese companies were busy building better products. Weibo, a micro- blogging platform initially inspired by Twitter, was far faster to expand multimedia functionality and is now worth more than the American company. Didi, the ride-hailing company that duked it out with Uber, dramatically expanded its product offerings and gives more rides each day in China than Uber does across the entire world. Toutiao, a Chinese news platform often likened to Buzzfeed, uses advanced machine-learning algorithms to tailor its content for each user, boosting its valuation many multiples above the American website. Dismissing these companies as copycats relying on government protection in order to succeed blinds analysts to world-class innovation that is happening elsewhere.

But the maturation of China’s entrepreneurial ecosystem was about far more than these trans-Pacific slugfests. After companies like Alibaba, Baidu, and Tencent had proven how lucrative China’s internet markets could be, new waves of venture capital and talent began to pour into the industry. Markets were heating up, and the number of Chinese startups was growing exponentially. These startups may have taken inspiration from across the ocean, but their real competitors were other domestic companies, and the clashes were taking on all the intensity of a sibling rivalry.

Battles with Silicon Valley may have created some of China’s homegrown internet Goliaths, but it was cutthroat Chinese domestic competition – and American naiveté - that forged a generation of gladiator entrepreneurs. Had American companies invested more resources in China or given their overseas branches the flexibility necessary to compete with increasingly competitive entrepreneurs, perhaps American internet giants wouldn’t have squandered so many promising opportunities.


The AI Revolution is Here!

Kai-Fu Lee explores whether there’s space for our humanity in a world run by intelligent machines, and offers inspiration for those who are troubled by the changes new technology will bring.

Learn more

I agree with you Rob. China and The USA are very different. But In most case the USA think they are way superior. We know by experience that it is not mostly the case. And Trump is accelerating the differences.SAD

回复
Robert Benedetti

Business Director at KARDENT

6 年

While I do agree with relatively few?of Mr. Lee's points...notably American business and political naivete about China...I find so many of his above assertions completely disingenuous. Was the Chinese government ever going to allow domestic "champions" to be foreign? Please! Apple China is currently a?perfect example! As the world increasingly heads?toward a bi-polar internet, its increasingly clear...at least to realists...that the two; countries, societies, cultures, governance?and agendas are simply too diverse to have expected virtually any aspect of them to have found too much common ground. (but regrets, I'm not a book author!)????

Yip L.

Accelerating Revenue Growth through Innovative Solutions

6 年

It is a well known fact US technology companies (not including hardware) cannot get into China but same observation for Chinese companies who failed to go international. It's certainly a cultural issue but most importantly, once these companies have grown substantially in their respective market, the CEOs in both markets are surrounded by naysayers from different departments due to lack of understanding and fear of failure or liability. There are possibilities to be successful which will require strong commitment and patience from the board of directors.

Shirley Smith, BS, CSAC

President Founder of His Ministries, nonprofit for the Prevention & Intervention of Substance Abuse - Big Stone Gap, VA

6 年

Well said.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Kai-Fu Lee的更多文章

  • Can humans and AI work side by side? A guide to what comes next

    Can humans and AI work side by side? A guide to what comes next

    A human perspective shift for the 21st Century. In August, Elon Musk announced that he was developing a humanoid robot…

    103 条评论
  • 水滴纽交所上市,为亿万家庭健康保障创造更大价值

    水滴纽交所上市,为亿万家庭健康保障创造更大价值

    北京时间5月7日晚间,水滴正式以“WDH”为证券代码在纽约证券交易所挂牌上市,成为中国首家登陆纽交所的保险科技平台。水滴也成为继传智教育、知乎之后,今年第3家成功IPO的创新工场兄弟企业。…

    20 条评论
  • 泡沫可怕,创业融不到钱而死亡更可怕

    泡沫可怕,创业融不到钱而死亡更可怕

    过去的一年,黑天鹅漫天飞,在投资领域有的赛道需要挤泡沫,有的赛道则需要重振旗鼓,寻找新的机会点。在近日投中网的专访中,我做了相关分享,我认为,中国将迎来科技驱动的产业升级黄金期,To…

    24 条评论
  • 农业是AI落地的最好场景

    农业是AI落地的最好场景

    日前,创新工场投资的 "AI+农业” 优秀企业极飞科技在北京举办了一场 “数字农业与可持续发展论坛。我和与极飞科技联合创始人龚槚钦一道,就…

    4 条评论
  • AI涵养成职场人标配

    AI涵养成职场人标配

    最近我接受了一个采访,分析了在AI时代,科技人才的涵养如何被二次定义,AI与人的关系如何被二次校准。AI正推动文艺二次复兴,让人可以再一次找到生命意义,展开哲学的思索——你为什么而存在? 以下文章来源:台湾《远见杂志》…

    19 条评论
  • “非标准答案” 特别策划 - 后浪研究所

    “非标准答案” 特别策划 - 后浪研究所

    最近参与了一个有意思的 “非标准答案” 特别策划,据说问题来自科技媒体36氪从1000位年轻朋友们的困惑中,挑选出18个最具代表性的问题,并请来投资人、企业家、创业者、经济学家等来集体解惑。…

    5 条评论
  • 《纽约时报》 专栏:以人为本,拥抱AI新经济

    《纽约时报》 专栏:以人为本,拥抱AI新经济

    近年来,自动化、机器人与人工智能已经接管了部分常规性、重复性工作。在全球新冠疫情的冲击下,安全保障及降本提效的需求迫切,为自动化取代人工的落地进程起到推波助澜的作用。疫情期间,各行各业都竭力避免人和人直接产生接触,类似餐饮外卖、快递流通、远…

    10 条评论
  • 沃比医疗完成数亿元C轮融资 高瓴创新工场投资

    沃比医疗完成数亿元C轮融资 高瓴创新工场投资

    沃比医疗近日宣布完成超过数亿人民币的C轮融资,由高瓴创投领投,创新工场、松柏资本跟投,歌路资本连续担任独家财务顾问。融资所得将用于公司核心产品的全面落地,以及脑卒中产品的海内外上市。据悉,沃比医疗在今年8月份刚完成了上一轮融资。…

    10 条评论
  • “AI+农业” 极飞科技获12亿元融资,软银和创新工场等机构参投

    “AI+农业” 极飞科技获12亿元融资,软银和创新工场等机构参投

    农业AI的时代已经来了。 农业科学领域的头部公司「极飞科技」,今日宣布完成新一轮融资,金额高达12亿元人民币。…

    21 条评论
  • 豌豆思维C轮融资1.8亿美金,创新工场连续投资五轮,中国在线小班课第一

    豌豆思维C轮融资1.8亿美金,创新工场连续投资五轮,中国在线小班课第一

    上周,少儿数理思维头部企业豌豆思维 “豌豆思维”…

    7 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了