?? The Silent Infiltration: AI-Generated Text in Scholarly Papers ??
Nader Ale Ebrahim, “Research Visibility and Impact” consultant. Photo created by Microsoft copilot.

?? The Silent Infiltration: AI-Generated Text in Scholarly Papers ??

By Nader Ale Ebrahim

?? ORCID: https://orcid.org/0000-0001-7091-4439


Abstract:?In recent years, artificial intelligence (AI) has quietly made its way into academic publishing. Researchers, driven by the need for efficiency and productivity, have turned to AI tools like ChatGPT for assistance. However, this trend raises ethical questions and challenges the integrity of scholarly work. In this article, we explore the phenomenon of AI-generated text infiltrating academic literature, its implications, and potential solutions.


Introduction: The Rise of Suspicious Tell Words?Scientists have expressed concerns about the misuse of AI chatbots, such as ChatGPT, in scientific literature.?Instances of suspicious AI shibboleths—distinctive phrases or patterns—have been detected in published papers1. While some cases are obvious, others remain elusive, making it difficult to identify AI involvement. Automated text detectors are unreliable tools for analyzing papers, leaving room for further investigation.


The AI Style: A Subtle Shift?Researchers have identified certain key words and phrases that tend to appear more frequently in AI-generated sentences than in typical human writing.?For instance, terms like “complex and multifaceted” have become telltale signs of AI involvement1. Librarians and scholars attuned to this style can discern subtle shifts, but the challenge lies in distinguishing genuine human contributions from AI-generated content.


Ethical Dilemmas: Plagiarism and Academic Integrity?Using AI output in scholarly work raises ethical dilemmas. Is it plagiarism if ideas are copy-pasted from ChatGPT? Should credit be given to the researcher or the AI? These questions underscore the need for clear guidelines and transparency in academic writing. While AI can enhance productivity, it must not compromise the integrity of research.


Mitigating the Impact: Responsible AI Integration?As AI continues to infiltrate academic literature, institutions and publishers must adopt responsible practices. Researchers should acknowledge AI assistance transparently, and journals should develop guidelines for handling AI-generated content. By striking a balance between efficiency and integrity, we can harness AI’s potential while safeguarding the scholarly process.


Conclusion: Navigating the AI Frontier?The silent infiltration of AI-generated text challenges the norms of academic publishing. As the scientific community grapples with this paradigm shift, collaboration between researchers, publishers, and AI developers becomes crucial. By fostering open dialogue and ethical awareness, we can navigate the AI frontier while preserving the essence of scholarly inquiry.


Remember, while AI tools offer immense benefits, their integration must align with ethical standards.?Let’s engage in thoughtful discussions and shape a future where AI and human expertise coexist harmoniously in academia234.


1:?Is AI infiltrating scientific publishing? Rise of ‘suspicious’ tell words popping up in published papers

2, 4:?AI-assisted writing is quietly booming in academic journals—here’s why that’s OK?

3:?Ethical Dilemmas in Using AI-Generated Text in Scholarly Manuscripts??


Note: The figure is generated by Microsoft Copilot, and the text is corrected by Microsoft Copilot?


?References

1.????? Ale Ebrahim, Nader (2024). Research Skills (Write a Bibliometric Paper), Session 8: Ensuring Ethical Practices in Bibliometric Research. figshare. Presentation. https://doi.org/10.6084/m9.figshare.25852336.v1

?

?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Nader Ale Ebrahim的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了