Signs of quantum mechanics in TPD

The system of basic features of quantum mechanics works in the table of prime distribution.

It works according to the ideas of Bohr, Planck, de Brooglie, perhaps the Riemann hypothesis; etc.

/ The description is given in the edited draft of the book "Symbol of Life" /

Behind each value of the distribution of prime numbers is a hidden trio of Pythagorean numbers

with an offset. The series of values of each prime number, in the mentioned table, hides its own

wavelengths with a given frequency. These are present in the spiral of matter formation through the

aforementioned three Pythagorean numbers with a shift.

For interest:

In the geometry of the universe, squares form rows of odd numbers. A series of odd numbers also

points to the number of right triangles in a spiral.

The combinatorics of the sum of two numbers with a connection to the trinity of Pythagorean

numbers determines that:

C - B is from the series of squares - 1; 4; 9; 16; 25; etc.

C - A is from a series of numbers - 2; 8; 18; 32; 50; etc. - connection with electrons on orbital - Bohr

Planck's indivisible quantum leaps - "indivisible primes" are present in every line of a given prime,

which contains blue and red values going to infinity. They create additional values in the row of the

given prime number. This means that the value of a given prime number is constantly added. -

Planck

The duality of the wave and the particle is written directly in the numerical value of the mentioned

de Brooglie table

I say that numerical values are a photon - a scalar wave that proceeds along its semi-line according

to the trinity of numbers 3; 4a 5. It has the appropriate wavelength with frequency.

In a scalar wave - at the number point of a photon, matter is present. It is worked by a vector of

Pythagorean numbers with an offset. This shift means that "C" in Pythagoras' equation is not equal

to the sum of the squares "A ^ 2 + B ^ 2", but by vibration - resonance in space, the numerical value

of C constantly deviates from the correct sum by 2, or -2.

This is where electrons begin to arrange on the orbits of the atom.

To date, I have not heard of the Hohenberg-Kohn theorem, but I think the conclusion in the link to

this page speaks of the mentioned inequality:

E {1} + E {2} <E {1} + E {2}

In my terminology:

3 ^ 2 + 3 ^ 2 is not equal to 4 ^ 2; 9 + 9 is not equal to 16, but 18.

3 ^ 2 + 5 ^ 2 is not equal to 6 ^ 2; 9 + 25 is not equal to 36, but 34.

If we calculate the bases of squares, we always get another three. In this case 6, 8 and 10.

Related to this is our ignorance of where matter hides:

From columns where no value is written, a prime pair is always calculated. Behind the prime pair is a

hidden nucleus of an atom.

And we know that matter forms the nucleus of an atom. Therefore, each mass passes through

electromagnetic radiation, behind which a prime pair is present.

The interconnection in space is valid through these two numerical values.

Theoretically: If "5" moves, it affects "7" and thus "7" moves.

From the numerical values in the table, we calculate the prime number according to the formula 6 *

k - 1, or 6 * k - 1.

Since a photon with the emerging position of electrons on the orbits of the atom is hidden behind

the numerical value, then -1 and 1 of the mentioned formula are spin electrons.

The spins of the electrons are, in my opinion, the zero zeta points from the Riemann hypothesis.