Should you raise a Junior specialist or hire a Middle?

Raise a Junior or hire a Middle?

There is no right answer to this question. It all depends on many factors:

• Project complexity.
• Team synergy.
• The number of tasks.
• Project deadlines
• Project budget

The configuration of such indicators can be used to decide which one to choose.?

For example, if you want to hit a nail into a board, it is better to use a hammer than a microscope ??

Why is a junior specialist better?

Each position has its own + and -

If you catch a good enthusiastic junior specialist with a thirst for development, you can make a more dedicated employee for the company if you give him knowledge and advice on the best way to develop him in the future

He can quickly transform himself from a junior to a middle in an ongoing project

Junior is less independent in his work and takes more time to help and pay attention to control the quality of the work done, but over time his/her performance improves

Tasks are done faster and with better quality

Why is a middle specialist better?

Middle, in most cases, is already an established professional who knows where and how he wants to develop. The hiring process may already be difficult because the project may not be suitable.

In their work, the middle will show stable results in solving problems and will find ways to solve them independently and apply them.

Usually, a middle is already an independent professional who needs a little attention and help with tasks.

Conclusion

Again, I can't say that the middle is better than the junior or vice versa. But statistics show that most people want to hire a mid-level specialist, as most projects must be done as quickly as possible.

Few want to spend time training and supporting young professionals.