Should You Enroll in a 6-24 Month AI/ML/GenAI Course? A Telecom Perspective
Sanjay Kumar ↗?
Founder - TelcoLearn | Driving Innovation in 5G/6G Technologies | 5G/6G Expert | Open RAN Advocate | Passionate Educator & Mentor | Building the Future of Telco Training
I frequently get asked this question by many learners, so I thought of addressing it here. The hype around AI and ML has led many Telecom Professionals to consider enrolling in AI/ML courses that last anywhere from 6 to 24 months and cost between $500 and $4,000. But the real question is—are these courses truly beneficial for a telecom engineer? That’s exactly what I’ll be discussing in this article.
Let’s take a critical look.
1. AI in Telecom: Fast-Moving, Ever-Changing
AI and ML technologies evolve at a rapid pace. In telecom, we see AI-driven network automation, anomaly detection, and predictive maintenance being updated almost every quarter. By the time you finish a long-term course, the tools and techniques you learned may already be outdated.
For instance, traditional AI-based network optimization relied on rule-based anomaly detection. Today, deep reinforcement learning (DRL) is being used for real-time network slicing. Tomorrow, a new method could make DRL obsolete.
2. Fundamentals That Don’t Always Translate to Telecom
Many AI/ML courses start with generic topics—image classification (like identifying cats and dogs) or building simple recommendation systems. But how does this knowledge help a telecom engineer optimize 5G network handovers or predict RAN congestion?
Telecom AI problems are unique:
If your goal is to apply AI in telecom, a generic long-term course may not be the best use of your time.
3. Learning by Doing vs. Theoretical Courses
In telecom, hands-on AI learning is far more valuable than theoretical AI models. Instead of a year-long AI course, consider:
4. AI for Telecom: The Smart Approach
If you want to leverage AI in telecom, focus on: ? Understanding AI applications in telecom (e.g., AI-driven fault prediction in 5G core). ? Learning practical tools like TensorFlow or PyTorch in the context of telecom datasets. ? Staying updated with telecom AI trends instead of committing to a rigid long-term curriculum.
The Bottom Line
Before enrolling in a 6-24 month AI/ML/GenAI course, ask yourself:
? Will this course teach AI techniques that apply to telecom, or just generic AI fundamentals?
? Will I get hands-on experience with telecom AI applications, or just theoretical knowledge?
? Can I learn faster with domain-specific AI training instead of a long-term commitment?
AI is reshaping telecom, but learning AI should be strategic and domain-specific.
Choose a learning path that directly benefits your role, rather than one that leaves you learning about image recognition while your competitors use AI to optimize 5G networks.
What do you think?
Have you taken an AI/ML course, and did it help in your telecom career?
Let’s discuss in the comments! ??
For more such content, Please follow me Sanjay Kumar ↗? or TelcoLearn
Engagement Manager-Services Sales-Managed Services Pre-sales & Solutions Network Design and Optimization-Cognitive Software, AI-ML, Business Strategy Analytics ,CRAN,ORAN, and RAN Automation using AI/ML & 6G.
2 周In my view, AI and ML are just tools that speed up calculations, but the true marvels of human achievement have always been driven by human intelligence. In the past, these efforts required manual labor, and now machines are taking on that role. While automation is useful, it’s not something to be overly fascinated by—it’s simply a means to an end. There’s no need to take AI and ML too seriously, as history shows that technology constantly evolves and becomes obsolete—CDMA, 3G, 4G, and now even 5G are being reconsidered, with discussions already shifting to 6G, 7G, and beyond. Instead of blindly following the hype, we should let human intelligence take the lead, with machines serving as tools—an option, but never the only option. I’m not sure if you all agree or disagree with this perspective, but that’s how I see it.
Graduate Research Student
2 周Well said. True