Should You DC Test Your Rubber Insulating Gloves?
Saf-T-Gard International, Inc.
Bringing Workers Home Safely Since 1936.
Electrical safety in the workplace consistently ranks in OSHA’s Top 10 List of Most Commonly Cited OSHA Safety Violations. While LOTO (lockout-tagout) and arc flash assessments are certainly components of a comprehensive electrical safety program, only?rubber insulating gloves?(electrical gloves) protect working hands from electrical shock hazards. Hazards above 50 volts are recognized by OSHA in 1910.269?Working on Exposed Energized Parts, which includes the requirement that employees must avoid contact above 50 volts AC unless they are insulated with?rubber insulating gloves?meeting the ASTM D120 standard (per OSHA 1926.97).
Since the late 19th?century, electric power systems standardized on alternating current (AC).?Since AC systems range from residential and commercial 110-volt power to ultra-high-voltage overhead power lines, all of the rubber insulating products covered by ASTM Specifications as referenced by OSHA are manufactured and tested with AC. These ASTM Specifications include not only testing voltages but maximum use voltages as well. While no laboratory test can perfectly simulate real world hazards and conditions, it makes sense to test with AC for use with AC.
Even though electricity today is still predominantly powered by AC, computers, LEDs, solar cells, electrified mass transit and transportation, and electric vehicles all run on DC power. The ASTM Specifications for Electrical Protective Equipment for Workers generally include DC test voltages and DC maximum use voltages as well.
OSHA regulations and ASTM standards require regular?dielectric testing?of in-service?electrical gloves?in order to maintain compliance and ensure the products’ safety and integrity when exposed to a wide range of voltages. The interval between the date of issue and?electrical testing?should be based on work practices and test experience. For?electrical gloves, the interval shall not exceed six months except for industries such as telecommunications that utilize?electrical gloves?as precautionary protection. However, do not place?electrical gloves?into service unless they have been tested electrically within the previous twelve months. Periodic retesting of?electrical gloves?should be performed at the proof test voltage using specialized equipment designed to gradually increase the voltage to the desired test level. The dielectric test is two-fold: pass/fail on the ability to withstand the rated test voltage and, for?electrical gloves, quantitative on the ability to prevent electric current from passing through the rubber goods above the maximum contained in the specifications. At a minimum, ASTM standards require that the inspection and testing process include the following steps:
While AC (alternating current) testing is the primary method of electrical testing and applicable for general use,?DC (direct current) testing?is necessary for rubber insulating products in applications where there is exposure to DC. Moreover, the ASTM Specifications for Electrical Protective Equipment for Workers do include both AC and DC test voltages and maximum use voltages for safety. Therefore, it makes sense to DC test?electrical gloves?where there is exposure to DC energized circuits and equipment.
领英推荐
The?Saf-T-Gard??Voltgard??Test Lab?is the largest, independent NAIL4PET-accredited test lab for rubber insulating products in the United States and offers complete retesting and certification of?rubber gloves,?sleeves,?blankets,?line hose,?covers,?dielectric footwear,?jumper cables,?grounding sets,?plastic guards,?hot sticks,?matting,?hoods, and?hand tools. The?Saf-T-Gard??Voltgard??Test Lab?is outfitted with state-of-the-art equipment for the complete testing of these products, including washing, visual inspecting, and electrical testing – all to applicable ASTM standards.
The?Saf-T-Gard??Voltgard??Test Lab?proudly offers?electrical testing?at both AC and DC voltages. Products passing the inspection and test procedures can then be returned to service for continued use and cost savings over purchasing a new pair of?electrical gloves?that could have been re-tested and re-certified by a qualified test lab for a fraction of the cost. All?electrical gloves?are tested at AC voltages for general use and clearly marked with the AC maximum use voltage prior to shipment, and all?electrical gloves?tested at DC voltages are clearly marked with the DC maximum use voltage.
Moreover, the?Saf-T-Gard??Voltgard??Test Lab?has one of the largest new rubber goods inventories available to immediately replace any goods not meeting applicable standards, including ASTM, OSHA, or your company’s own safety policies.
So why spend approximately $200 to replace a pair of?electrical gloves?when you can have them tested and recertified at the?Saf-T-Gard??Voltgard??Test Lab?for less than 10% of that cost without sacrificing safety or compliance?
Connect with Saf-T-Gard to Learn More
As a leading manufacturer and distributor of rubber insulating products,?arc flash safety clothing and kits,?grounding equipment?and?testing services, Saf-T-Gard is dedicated to serving industries where worker safety and protection from electrical current are critically important.? So, when it comes to protecting your electrical workers, don’t trust just anyone with their safety. Trust the experts with more than 85 years of experience and excellence in their craft. Trust Saf-T-Gard. For an overview of our?electrical safety?products, and to order for immediate shipment, please visit?ELECTRICAL SAFETY.
Electrical SME
1 年With this approach, would electrical workers who work on AC & DC carry two sets of RI6s?
Owner, Pierce & Associates
1 年Its a pity that Europe have voted to write their own standard - likely to deviate from the performance requirements of the ASTM (ANSI J6) series of standards which are also referenced in IEC. Probably because some of the EU manufacturers can't pass the DC tests!
Manager-Process
1 年This is most important factor in conducting proof test
V.P. of Sales and Marketing
1 年Great discussion to have.