Should We Really Destroy PFAS? No! Your Fridge Knows a Better Way.

Should We Really Destroy PFAS? No! Your Fridge Knows a Better Way.

Will June 15 stay as a turning point in the history of PFAS battles? Future will tell, but for sure, the new health advisories published by the US Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) have placed the topic on top of many agendas.

A step-change? We discussed it with Henrik Hagemann , check it out!

No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image

The 15th of June 2022 is a day that will be remembered.?

It's the biggest change we've seen in the last six years for any contaminant in water...

That day, the US EPA administrator, Michael Regan announced the following:

People on the front lines of PFAS contamination have suffered for far too long. That's why EPA is taking aggressive action as part of a whole-of-government approach to prevent these chemicals from entering the environment and to help protect concerned families from this pervasive challenge

How aggressive? I'll let you judge for yourself:

Compared to 2016, the EPA determined PFOA to be 17,000 times more toxic than they thought. And that's 100,000 times more toxic than they considered in 2009!

We can't decently let people be exposed to something that dangerous, or can we?

Well, it's one thing to frame the challenge, but it's entirely another to define the right solution.

Technically, Ion Exchangers work well to remove short-chain compounds, and Activated Carbon filters take a fair cut on long-chain ones.?

Yet:?

  1. "Middle-Chain" compounds - i.e. GenX tend to slip through the cracks. (And for the first time, GenX comes with a health advisory level.)
  2. All existing solutions may well become far too expensive under this new paradigm. This is at least what a recent report by the American Water Works Association suggests:

Using existing treatment technologies would cost $370 billion just for PFAS. It makes no sense!?

So what's the alternative? Getting rid of PFAS altogether and praying for these forever chemicals to vanish by themselves?

We know that PFAS is essential for making stuff. It's super chemistry! You can use it to make mRNA vaccines to make semiconductors for EV cars and for the semiconductors in your phones...

But actually, without you noticing, there was a source of inspiration waiting for you in your kitchen all that time:

The refrigerators we use leverage a PFAS-based chemistry: the refrigerator fluid. Of course, you could use something else, but it won't be as efficient without that PFAS. And so, the industry built an infrastructure to capture it and reuse it in a circular economy.

What if PFAS recycling was the future of PFAS removal?

Think of it, instead of producing and destroying PFAS in a devil's circle that's inefficient multiple times across the value chain, we could follow what Henrik defines as a "Space-X" type approach.

Reuse as much as possible of both the removal catalyst and the separated substance!

And Puraffinity actually has a roll-out plan for this vision to come true:

We are executing a new roadmap, which is getting us beyond a hundred tons of production capacity. This will enable us to start addressing just some of these front runners' issues with PFAS!

Still a drop in the ocean. But an incredible drop of hope!

We also covered:

  • How miracle PFAS removal technologies that break the news have to be placed into their context
  • How, with the new PFAS regulations, we enter the realm of parts per quadrillion
  • How PFAS removal has greenhouse gas emission consequences and how the 2030 clock is ticking
  • How Puraffinity strives to monitor what comes next in PFAS science, regulation, and roll-out
  • How Utilities' new PFAS liability may represent an unfair burden, considering they don't reap the benefit of the chemicals' first use
  • How PFAS are everywhere around us in our daily lives and how it is an Iceberg we may want to address as a whole
  • How American regulators may want to emulate the European approach and why
  • But also thinking you're safe as long as you're not proven unsafe, the consequences on private wells, people delegating their water safety, bringing stakeholders together, Ellen McArthur, Erin Brockovich... and much more!

Check out this full episode on PFAS recycling on the (don't) Waste Water website!

Steven De Laet

CEO - Entrepreneur - Innovator- Board Member

2 å¹´

Henrik Hagemann great podcast! Happy to hear how you are progressing. I would be very interested to see the data that confirm that Gen-X could not be captured with for example resins. Based upon research we did Gen-X could be removed from wastewater with GAC and resins. The shorter the chain the more difficult. PFBA is a good reference point to benchmark different technologies.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Antoine Walter的更多文章

  • The Hidden Winners of China's DLE Export Ban

    The Hidden Winners of China's DLE Export Ban

    On January 2, China's Ministry of Commerce proposed to add direct lithium extraction technologies to its export control…

    2 条评论
  • The Water Startup Drake Equation

    The Water Startup Drake Equation

    How many alien civilizations can we expect out there? When asked this question at the inaugural meeting of the SETI…

    7 条评论
  • What 153'482 LinkedIn Ads Reveal

    What 153'482 LinkedIn Ads Reveal

    I know the future - so let me share it! Indeed, yes, I did it again: I drowned myself in 153'482 LinkedIn ads for the…

    11 条评论
  • Not THAT Scarcity

    Not THAT Scarcity

    People tend to want things more when they believe they are less available or might become unavailable That's what…

    13 条评论
  • I'm Sorry! (I'm not Sorry)

    I'm Sorry! (I'm not Sorry)

    So last week, I published an: ..

    31 条评论
  • Why Engineers Were Wrong about PFAS

    Why Engineers Were Wrong about PFAS

    So, I was wrong. But as I believe we can all learn three valuable lessons from that wrongness, I'd like to share, so…

    28 条评论
  • When Elon Dreams of Water...

    When Elon Dreams of Water...

    Elon Musk isn't entirely wrong when he says that: Because the cost of desalination has dropped so much, you can…

    31 条评论
  • 7 Must-Know Water Tech Trends For Investors

    7 Must-Know Water Tech Trends For Investors

    I want you to start the year with the best cards, so here's my gate-free full infographic review of a year in Water…

    113 条评论
  • I Need Your Help

    I Need Your Help

    This feels uncomfortable. ?? This is the time of the year when I'm exposing myself, and it's never easy for me, but…

    8 条评论
  • Why SUEZ's CEO Called It Quits

    Why SUEZ's CEO Called It Quits

    Remember when we thought the SUEZ saga couldn't get more dramatic than the Veolia takeover? Well, grab your popcorn…

    18 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了