Should the UK CAA follow European decision to classify the DJI Mavic 3 under a C1 certification and what are the potential consequences if it does?
DJI Mavic 3

Should the UK CAA follow European decision to classify the DJI Mavic 3 under a C1 certification and what are the potential consequences if it does?

The DJI Mavic 3 has been in the news a lot recently. The drone’s recent receipt of a C1 class certification under the European EASA drone regulations, making it the world’s first drone to receive this class rating, created quite a stir within the drone community. This was quickly followed by the release of the new Mavic 3 Enterprise drones, which presumably will also fall under this “Mavic 3 Series” C1 certification with potentially wide-reaching implications across the drone industry and beyond.

This is a huge win for DJI, who have pulled off an incredible feat in gaining a C1 certification for the Mavic 3 Series, basically putting their new Enterprise drones in the hands of any member of the buying public without the need for any training or qualification.

While most in the drone community were expecting a C2 classification for drones in the weight class of the Mavic 3 series (and likely the Mavic 2 series if other legacy drones were allowed a retrospective certification), it was quite a surprise when the news was announced that TüV Rheinland (a global testing and assessment service provider) had assessed that the drone complied with the requirements of the EASA C1 class certification, providing it has some updated firmware. *(see below)

Within the open category are three subcategories that have increasingly fewer requirements (with A1 having the most, and A3 having the least)

The new C1 certification allows the drone to be flown within the A1 subcategory of the Open Category, without any training or qualification of the operator. While drones in the A2 category require the operator to hold an A2CofC qualification, this is not required to operate C1 drones.

The subcategories are:

  • A1: Flights over some people, but not over assemblies of people.
  • A2: Flights close to people.
  • A3: Flights far from people.

It’s easy to understand why DJI would be so keen to push for C1 classification for their Mavic 3 Series of drones, as any barriers to potential customers using their product will reduce its potential market. While the A2CofC is not a hugely arduous qualification to gain, training of any kind will inevitably put some people off as it costs money and takes time. For small drones such as the sub-250g Mini 3 Pro this makes complete sense, as it’s a very light aircraft with small propellors which will likely cause minimal damage if used incorrectly around people however the A1 subcategory allows flight “close to people”, with no “intentional” overflight.

So, under the new regulations, the restrictions have been lifted in such a way that the Mavic 3 can now be flown close to people by individuals who have never flown a drone before. This seems a strange and potentially harmful decision

For an approximately 1kg drone, with fairly substantial props spinning at 5000rpm, there seems to be at least a fair potential for harm if flown around people by a person who has no training or experience (regardless of the fact that a 1kg object falling from 400ft reaches a terminal velocity of approximately 50 mph.... which could do a fair bit of damage)

The priority of any responsible drone operator is to mitigate risk to ensure that every deployment is carried out as safely as possible. This requires evaluation and monitoring of both the drone, operator, and operating environment, and any operators working under a CAA Operational Authorisation will be required to maintain pilot records, maintenance records of the drone and batteries, etc. Although operating under the A2CofC does not require this, the training does help build an understanding of the importance of safety processes.

While training and qualification will not stop accidents from happening, it does encourage responsible drone use which becomes increasingly important at a time when drones are becoming cheaper and more prolific. With more drones in the air being flown around people, by pilots with no training and experience, the risks will inevitably rise. I am sure this has been evaluated and judged to not be a problem prior to determining the classification but it would be surprising if this does not result in a rise in drone-related incidents.

For the wider drone industry, the decision to allow very capable Enterprise drones to be operated without training or qualification is likely to have a noticeable impact in a range of sectors. While many drone operators will doubtless still make the decision to gain their A2CofC or General VLOS Certificate for their accreditation, and presumably many clients will require that their suppliers meet certain standards, there is no doubt that demand for drone training will suffer and therefore that area of the industry is bound to experience quite a fallout from this decision.

For drone service providers themselves, now that the barriers to entry have been reduced and drones with very high specifications for enterprise operations can be operated without any training or qualification, competition will doubtless increase and even a basic understanding of economics suggests that market forces are going to push the costs of drone services down, having implications on the many smaller businesses currently providing drone services.

The prolific growth of the drone industry requires regular review and update of regulations to meet the demands of innovation and the ever-expanding possibilities afforded by drones and I have no doubt that safety is paramount in all considerations when decisions are made. It does, however, feel a little bit like we’re taking a step back into the Wild West of unregulated drone use by classifying the Mavic 3 as a C1 drone.



* The new firmware update will make the following changes to the Mavic 3 to make it C1 compliant.

  • Meeting a new noise reduction level of 83db.
  • When the ActiveTrack Intelligent Flight Mode is?used to film?people or objects, the distance from the person/object will be limited to 50 m. Beyond 50 m, ActiveTrack will be disabled.
  • The Auxiliary LEDs will be turned on or off automatically during use, based on the actual environment.
  • The LEDs at the front arms of the drone will blink by default for the duration of the UAV being powered on.


#dronesforgood #drones #djimavic

Waleed Ahmed Shahid

MS in Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning @ TU Darmstadt| Driving Innovation for a Smarter Future ??

2 年

Dji is a very well established drone company. They have always produced well designed and reliable drones. I like how along with the news, the article also explained the categories of EASA. Will keep these in mind in the future. Thanks for sharing.

回复
David Moffitt

Client Director - Commercial Insurance Broking

2 年

From the best ?? Drone site survey specialist in the UK

回复
Princewill Odum

GIS Project Manager, Geospatial Data Analyst, GIS Consultant, IT support, Drone Pilot, University Lecturer, Data Analyst

2 年

Like the FAA in the US, classification is done on the basis of weight. All drones 250grams and below falls under a certain classification with appropriate conditions for use (https://www.caa.co.uk/consumers/remotely-piloted-aircraft/drones-flying-in-the-open-category/) Even though I kind of disagree with classification by weight because some sophisticated drones might weigh less but have very high and precise capabilities (take the hornet for example) I final thought would be that the industry experts should meet and guide policy on this such that UK CAA would have what is best for the UK.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了