Should Israel Strike Iran?

Should Israel Strike Iran?


ARGUING YES

Michael Doran: Senior Fellow and Director of the Center for Peace and Security in the Middle East at the Hudson Institute

ARGUING NO

Shira Efron: Senior Director of Policy Research?at the Israel Policy Forum

MODERATOR

John Donvan: Host and Moderator-in-Chief


This week:

  • New episode: Should Israel retaliate against Iran after recent missile strikes?
  • A closer look at Iran and Israel’s military capabilities
  • Your weekly reading list


Iran is in the middle of an unprecedented moment in its history. In recent years, Iran has grown as a source of instability for the Middle East — especially for Israel.


In a new phase of the regional conflict that’s been on and off since April as a spillover of the Israel-Hamas War, assassinations of political leaders within Hamas and the Iran-backed group Hezbollah and rocket strikes conducted in Iran, Israel, and southern Lebanon have many peoples’ eyes on the threat it poses to Israel. Most recently, Iran sent 180 missiles, striking Israel and the West Bank as a reaction to Hezbollah leader Hassan Nasrallah’s death. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu has vowed retaliation, stating “whoever attacks, we will attack them.” Should Israel use this moment to strike Iran or are there better options?


Our debaters this week are authorities on Middle Eastern foreign policy and both advocate for Israel’s security. Arguing “yes” to strike is the director of the Center for Peace and Security in the Middle East at the Hudson Institute?Michael Doran, who says that the U.S. should back Israel now in a large and coordinated military strike on nuclear facilities. Arguing “no” to this strategy is Senior Director of Policy Research at the Israel Policy Forum?Dr. Shira Efron. She says striking now is playing into what Hezbollah, Hamas, and other enemies want in an all-out war and there are more risks in launching a surprise attack. Instead, Israel should focus on alternatives, including the elimination of Iran’s proxy networks.


Should Israel strike Iran? What would that mean for the U.S.’s stance in mediating between the two countries? Listen now on?Apple Podcasts,?Spotify, and?YouTube. As always, let us know what you think.?



DEBATING THE DATA:

Which country has the bigger military advantage?




POINT/COUNTERPOINT:

Should Israel Strike Iran?


YES: Michael Doran

"Israel has to [strike Iran]. It has no choice. This is very much Iran's war. Iran started it, and the goal of the war is to weaken not just Israel, but the American alliance system. The problem will only be solved by deterring Iran.”


NO: Shira Efron

"Israelis have felt, for the first time since 1948, that they're facing an existential threat. The whole region is on edge. After a very painful year here, the IDF has finally achieved what we call ‘escalation dominance’ on Hezbollah. Let's keep the eye on the ball, try to finish the proxies, and have a different strategy when we come to Iran.”



WEEKLY POINTS OF VIEW

How much will the Supreme Court matter in the 2024 election?

Erwin Chemerinsky | October 6, 2024

Los Angeles Times

Watch Erwin's mock trial on whether Trump's conviction should stand


Stay-at-Home Americans

Bella DePaulo | October 7, 2024

Psychology Today

Watch Bella's debate on whether it's better to be married or single


On immigration, Harris needs to broker a border deal and revive bipartisan consensus

Kristie De Pe?a and Matthew La Corte | September 27, 2024

The Hill

Watch Kristie's debate on securing the border


How to Get the Broadband Equity, Access, and Deployment Program Back on Track

Mark Jamison | October 8, 2024

AEIdeas

Watch Mark’s debate on whether Amazon is good for small business



Defend Democracy: Keep America Open to Debate

In times like these, defending democracy requires informed and respectful dialogue. Open to Debate is committed to fostering informed, civil discussions that uphold democratic values. Donate today to keep the spirit of open dialogue and democratic engagement alive.


BE CURIOUS. BE OPEN-MINDED. BE OPEN TO DEBATE.

Mark Alan Bartholomew

Applied physics.(JOIN ME) the work presented here is entirely new

4 个月

WE DO NOT displace one population for another.... In so many ways, what was established.... is wrong. From a religious standpoint, we can not possess anything... truly; not material things,... not people... not land. From a moral standpoint, this project began with death,.. and continues in death today. From a political standpoint, this displacement of one for another (population) has served the powers to be (as described by Peter,.... Peter Phillips, in his book "Giants, The Global Power Elite) ... in that it has created strife and conflict and the tools for profit and war, for the next 1000 years, ensuring that these men in high places, have both a foundation of hatred in which to work from, and allowing them to divide and to conquer generations to come, in propaganda of this hatred. Here do we teach hatred, to our children,.... The very same entities, families... groups and corporations that supported Hitler financially during the second world war, benefit today,... There is no mystery and no scriptural references accomplished here,... just profit and greed realized. MARK applied physics JOIN ME. ...... https://www.academia.edu/120841965/LETTER_OF_INVITATION

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Open to Debate的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了