Should Health Systems Consider the Entrepreneur Experience?
University Hospitals Ventures
Designing and investing in a future that delivers value and vitality for our hospital, our patients, and our community.
I think we all know the patient and provider experience is paramount to the future of healthcare. We also know that innovation is required to transform these experiences, and many of us are working hard on these solutions as we speak. University Hospitals is indebted to the early-stage companies we have partnered with -- and invested in -- to close gaps and improve experiences with novel technologies. Admittedly many of the external applications that are live in our system overcame remarkable odds just to get noticed, reviewed, funded, contracted, and implemented. Some of the companies spent years overcoming many hurdles just to get pilots started. Ask any startup, perhaps over drinks, about their own experience, and I think many systems would blush and offer to buy the next round.?
Every startup founder I know would likely be mortified if we were considering their experience in the same breath as the consumer experience. But if we really believe innovation is a key ingredient to transforming healthcare, perhaps we should consider the innovation experience, or more specifically for this post, the entrepreneur experience.?
To start, let’s lay out some of the most common barriers to a positive experience for startups that are looking to work with providers.?
Do the headlines on these constraints sound familiar? They are the exact prickly pears that seem to snag us every time we start our work on reimagining the healthcare consumer experience. But do you know who can help us with those roadblocks? Entrepreneurs! We want them to gravitate toward us for this reason. If we continue to force startups to survive the gauntlet of ?minutiae in order to get the distinct honor of letting us take their tech for a spin, we will exhaust them. Just as our patients might go to our competitors (or worse, avoid care) the savviest of startups will stop working with providers, and instead work with our disruptors. And the most innovative solutions will no longer be built for us.?
I certainly don’t suggest that healthcare systems work with every company that knocks on their door. Realistically, and according to our own UH Ventures data, we contract with less than 5% of the startups we talk to annually. While we wish we could do more, the constraints laid out above are not necessarily going away.?
So what can systems do???
领英推荐
It starts with being better communicators. We can take a minute to send a note back or set up a 15-minute call to get to know them. We can try to be better at giving real and actually helpful feedback, no matter how brief. We can show them our processes and checklists, and manage expectations from the beginning. We can be honest when things aren’t going as planned. And we can tell them no, or not right now, so they can find another system with a more urgent need for their solution than us.?
In other words, maybe some of us with ventures and innovation roles should start thinking of these startups, as our consumers. We can show empathy, support where we can, deliver hard news, and celebrate success with them. I’ll be the first to admit that UH Ventures can do better. We can’t afford to sap the spirit of the entrepreneurs by burying them in our inbox, and we can’t let the future of healthcare wander in the wilderness somewhere between Business Associate Agreements and Architecture Review. ?
If healthcare systems can invest in the entrepreneur experience, the innovations will keep coming. And maybe, just maybe, the next round of drinks will be a toast to our good work together.??
Written by:
Matthew Zenker, MBA
Senior Portfolio Manager, UH Ventures ?
Ethical product leader, Fractional CEO, CPO, Investor, and NED. 28 years start-up and scale-up experience in the EU and US. Proven track record in year-on-year business growth and M&A.
2 年Great article, thanks for re-sharing Dom. Well done Matt! My recent experience suggests that some of the providers in the US are pretty good at this founder engagement and will have an honest and open discussion. They obviously care and nurture, but are not afraid to be transparent when required. Others go completely dark/ghost you (not nice when you have ploughed your life savings and sanity into your mission), while others are afraid of being honest about the bad news. It's the ghosting that I find the most frustrating. This is a great article for the ghosters....The Kryptonite of the Healthcare world :). I am sure we both know a few of those right :).
CEO at Xploro and Chair at Corporation Pop
2 年Great article Matt. That consideration for the startup's experience really sets UH apart from may other providers. Innovation happens through rapid iteration (learning from both successes and failures) but that's difficult when you are a bootstrapped startup is dealing with a large organisation on a completely different time dimension. Not the case at UH thankfully :-)
Founder & CEO at OndeCare & Fractional Executive for Energy Startups
2 年Thanks for seeing, hearing, and sharing this journey from your perspective! I love all your thoughts and I think they can apply to all VCs, too. One thing that you do so well is you are mentally present during meetings. This is now something I pay great attention to in all venture meetings. Helps me prioritize my own interest.
Continual improvement seeker with old school belief that better healthcare outcomes come from strengthening trusted relationships.
2 年Why not prioritize clinician startups? ? ?Most likely to be solving problems rather than developing workarounds.?
President and Co-Founder, Zest Pediatric Network
2 年Great job Matt. You nailed many of the challenges and considerations. One more to add, ability to think out of the box and challenge the status quo. Likely part of each you outlined. Good luck!