Should Cyber Security Folks Worry about Quantum Computing?

We live in fascinating times. Just when you think technology can't get any more interesting, something comes along that pushes the boundaries even further. Google's recent announcement of their new quantum processor, Willow, is exactly that kind of moment – where science fiction starts to feel more like science fact.

As someone fascinated by quantum mechanics and passionate about technology and cybersecurity, watching these fields intersect is like seeing the future unfold in real-time. It's not every day that two of the most exciting areas in science collide in such a spectacular way, with implications that could reshape how we think about computing and security.

If you've been on social media lately, you've probably seen the flood of posts about Google's Willow announcement. It's funny – and a bit concerning – how the reactions split into two extremes. One side is hitting the panic button, saying we need to completely overhaul our security systems right now. The other side is basically saying, "Meh, it's just hype." You know how the internet is – everything's either the end of the world or totally meaningless.

Let's talk about quantum physics for a minute. You've probably heard people say "nobody understands quantum mechanics" – even famous physicists have said it. But here's the thing: that's not exactly true and out of context. What they really mean is that quantum stuff doesn't behave like the everyday world we're used to and hard to visualise in our brain. It's weird, sure, but we actually understand it well enough to use it every day.

Think about it this way: every time you use your phone's GPS, you're using quantum physics. When doctors use MRI machines to look inside our bodies, they're harnessing quantum mechanics to make atoms reveal our internal structures. Even the device you're reading this on exists because we understand how electrons behave at the quantum level.

Let's zoom in on that last example for a minute. The silicon chips powering our digital world? They're quantum mechanics in action. Inside every modern computer chip are billions of tiny transistors – think of them as incredibly small switches. These switches only work because we understand quantum tunneling, a weird phenomenon where electrons can pass through barriers that classical physics says they shouldn't be able to cross. It's like if you threw a tennis ball at a brick wall, and sometimes the ball would just appear on the other side. Sounds impossible, right? But at the quantum level, this is exactly what happens with electrons.

By precisely controlling these quantum effects in silicon, we've built transistors so small that 50,000 of them could fit across the width of a human hair. This deep understanding of quantum behavior is what enables the entire digital revolution – from the smartphone in your pocket to the massive data centers running our internet. Every time you send a text, stream a video, or read an email, you're using devices that only work because we got the quantum physics right.

It's kind of like cooking. You don't need to understand the complex chemistry of baking to make a great cake – you just need to follow the recipe. Similarly, we might not be able to visualize quantum mechanics in our heads, but we've got the recipe (the math) down pretty well.

So... should we be Worried?

Before we dive into the cybersecurity implications, let's take a step back and look at where we actually are on the quantum computing journey.

Google's quantum roadmap in shows us exactly where we are in this journey. It's a six-step process:

1. Beyond Classical: Proving quantum computers can do something classical computers can't
2. Quantum Error Correction: Making quantum computers reliable
3. Building a Long-lived Qubit: Creating stable quantum bits
4. Creating a Logical Gate: Building the basic components for quantum calculations
5. Engineering Scale Up: Making the system bigger
6. Large Error-corrected Quantum Computer: The final goal – a useful quantum computer

Right now, with Willow, we're hovering between steps 1 and 2. It's like we've just invented the first airplane – revolutionary, yes, but a far cry from a modern jet.

The idea of quantum computing isn't new. Back in the 1980s, brilliant minds like Richard Feynman realized that classical computers were terrible at simulating quantum systems. It's like trying to explain a 3D movie using stick figures – you're missing something fundamental.

Then in 1994, Peter Shor came along and showed that quantum computers could theoretically crack the encryption that protects pretty much everything on the internet. That's when cybersecurity folks really started paying attention.

The race to build practical quantum computers looks a lot like the early days of the space race – with both tech giants and innovative startups pushing the boundaries in different ways. Google's making headlines with their Willow processor, while IBM is taking a different approach by offering their quantum systems through the cloud (https://www.ibm.com/quantum/pricing), letting researchers worldwide experiment with real quantum hardware. Microsoft is betting on an entirely different type of qubit that they hope will be more stable, while Intel is leveraging their chip-making expertise to explore silicon-based quantum computing. Meanwhile, smaller companies like IonQ and Rigetti are proving that innovation doesn't just come from the tech giants – they're developing unique approaches that might just leapfrog the competition. Universities and research labs worldwide are also making crucial breakthroughs, often partnering with these companies to solve fundamental challenges. It's a remarkable example of how competition and collaboration are driving innovation forward.

While most experts suggest we're about a decade away from practical quantum computers but the timeline isn't set in stone. The rapid advancement of AI and the massive build-out of computing infrastructure could be a game-changer. Just look at what happened with protein folding – a problem that stumped scientists for 50 years was largely solved in just a few years by DeepMind's AlphaFold. The AI system can now predict protein structures with atomic accuracy in minutes, something that used to take years of laboratory work. Similar breakthroughs are happening across science: AI is discovering new materials, optimizing chemical reactions, and even proving mathematical theorems in new ways.

This kind of AI-powered acceleration could dramatically speed up quantum computing development. Think about it: just a few years ago, nobody predicted ChatGPT or the current gen AI boom. The same kind of breakthrough could happen in quantum computing, especially with AI helping to solve complex engineering problems like qubit design, error correction, and quantum circuit optimization. We're already seeing AI being used to control quantum computers more precisely and to design better quantum experiments.

The answer is nuanced and depends on several factors:

What Are You Protecting?

Think about healthcare records. That genetic information you're storing today? It needs to stay private not just for years, but for generations. The same goes for classified government documents, corporate trade secrets, and even personal information that could impact people's lives decades from now. Organizations handling this kind of data are in a particularly tricky position. Look at pharmaceutical companies, for instance. Their drug development data, if decrypted in 20 years, could still be valuable to competitors. Some forward-thinking healthcare providers are already exploring quantum-resistant encryption for their most sensitive patient data, even though quantum computers aren't here yet. They're following the "better safe than sorry" playbook, and for good reason.

?

How Long Does Your Security Need to Last?

The financial sector offers a perfect example of how the timing of security needs varies. A credit card transaction only needs to stay secure for a few seconds – just long enough to complete the purchase. But what about mortgage documents? Those need to stay secure for decades. Major banks like JP Morgan Chase and Goldman Sachs are already investing in quantum-resistant cryptography research. They're not panicking, but they're preparing. The European Central Bank members have started testing post-quantum encryption for some of their communications. (Project Leap: https://www.bis.org/about/bisih/topics/cyber_security/leap.htm) They understand that the threat isn't just about what quantum computers can do today – it's about what they might be able to do tomorrow with data stolen today.

?

What's Your Risk Tolerance?

Different organizations face vastly different risk calculations. Consider a social media company versus a defense contractor. The social media company might handle millions of users' data, but most of it doesn't need long-term protection. Their biggest concern might be protecting authentication systems and user credentials. A defense contractor, on the other hand, is handling data that foreign governments might want to steal now and decrypt later.

?

What Are Your Resources?

Implementing quantum-resistant security isn't like installing a new antivirus program. Organizations need to consider their entire digital infrastructure. Take a medium-sized hospital system as an example. They might have hundreds of devices, from MRI machines to patient monitors, all using different types of encryption. Updating everything isn't just expensive – it's logistically challenging. Some organizations are taking a phased approach, identifying their most sensitive data first, protecting that first, and then gradually updating less critical systems. The U.S. National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) is currently standardizing post-quantum cryptography algorithms, which will make implementation more straightforward, but organizations still need to plan for significant time and resource investments.

?

The Time Factor: Building Trust in Cryptography

Here's something crucial that often gets overlooked in the quantum computing discussion: developing trustworthy cryptographic algorithms takes time – lots of it. It's not just about creating the math; it's about proving there are no hidden weaknesses or backdoors. Think about it like stress-testing a bridge – you want to be absolutely certain it won't collapse before you let traffic cross it.

RSA, the encryption system we use for much of today's secure internet traffic, wasn't just invented and immediately put to use. It took years of scrutiny by mathematicians and cryptographers worldwide before organizations felt confident enough to trust it with sensitive data. The same will be true for quantum-resistant algorithms. NIST started their post-quantum cryptography competition in 2016, and they're still working on finalizing the standards. This isn't slowness – it's necessary caution.

When we talk about adopting quantum-resistant cryptography, we're not just talking about swapping out one algorithm for another. We're talking about implementing systems that need to stand up to both classical and quantum attacks, and we need to be really, really sure they work as intended. History has shown us that rushing cryptographic implementations can lead to devastating vulnerabilities. Just look at the early days of wireless encryption or the numerous SSL/TLS vulnerabilities that have been discovered over the years – these were all solid technologies that still had hidden weaknesses that only became apparent with time and scrutiny.

?

Practical Steps Forward

Let's have an honest conversation about priorities. If your organization is still struggling with basic cybersecurity practices, quantum computing should not be keeping you up at night. It's like worrying about installing a high-tech alarm system when you haven't fixed the broken locks on your doors yet. The immediate threats – phishing attacks, unpatched systems, weak passwords, attack surface reduction – these are the issues that need your attention first.

Once you've got these basics well in hand, then you can start thinking about quantum computing's implications for your security strategy. This doesn't mean you need to rush out and implement quantum-resistant encryption tomorrow. Instead, start by understanding what data you have that might need long-term protection. Update your risk assessments to include quantum computing as a future consideration. Keep an eye on developments in quantum-resistant cryptography.

For organizations that already have mature security programs – those who have mastered the basics and built robust security practices – the approach to quantum readiness can be more proactive. Several forward-thinking organizations are already showing us what this looks like in practice. For instance, JP Morgan Chase has been experimenting with quantum-resistant encryption on their transaction systems, not because they need it today, but to understand how it affects system performance and compatibility. ?(https://www.jpmorgan.com/technology/news/firm-establishes-quantum-secured-crypto-agile-network)

In terms of risk assessment, one can start by adding "quantum risk scores" to your data classification systems. It's pretty straightforward: look at how long each type of data needs to stay secure and assign higher risk scores to data that needs protection beyond 10-15 years. This isn't rocket science – it's just adding one more factor to existing risk calculations. For example, employee payroll data from five years ago might get a low quantum risk score, while intellectual property related to next-generation technology would get a high one.

The European banking sector offers another practical example. Several major banks are running pilot programs where they maintain their current encryption but add an extra layer of quantum-resistant encryption to their most sensitive communications. It's like wearing both a belt and suspenders – maybe overkill today, but a good way to learn what works and what doesn't before you actually need it.

They should also take a hard look at their current security controls around data that needs long-term protection. This might mean adding extra layers of encryption, tightening access controls, or implementing stronger monitoring for systems holding sensitive data that needs to stay secure for decades. Think of quantum computing threats like climate change in the cybersecurity world – they're important to plan for, but they shouldn't distract from immediate security needs. The organizations that will handle the quantum transition best are those that have built a strong foundation of basic security practices. After all, the best quantum-resistant encryption in the world won't help if an attacker can just walk through your unlocked front door.

TLDR

Quantum computing is still in its early days. Google's Willow is impressive, but we're years away from quantum computers that could break current encryption.

Your priorities should be clear:

• Master the cybersecurity basics first. If you're still struggling with patches and passwords, that's where your focus needs to be.
• If you've got the basics covered and handle sensitive long-term data, start including quantum threats in your risk assessments.
• Begin strengthening security controls around your most critical data – not because quantum computers are coming tomorrow, but because good security takes time to implement right.

This isn't about rushing to implement quantum-resistant encryption today. It's about smart preparation while the technology evolves. Stay informed, stay practical, and keep building on your security foundations.

The goal isn't to predict the future perfectly – it's to be ready for it when it arrives.