Should Business Learn to Speak The Language of Tech?

Should Business Learn to Speak The Language of Tech?

Today, heard Neil Holden say something that really struck a chord with me. While discussing an IT vs Business question, he said "IT is the business". This I believe is an excellent and succinct enterprise translation the now famous Mark Andreessen quote from 2011 'Software is eating the world '.

When you look around you, you can see the impact of smart, connected, and software enabled products that surround you, starting with your mobile phone, which has replaced a dozen analog gadgets including flashlights, spirit levels, maps, and wristwatches. But in enterprise technology terms, the landscape is more complex. For example, there are often 4 distinct streams of technology in many businesses. The first is IT, which historically is about keeping connectivity, productivity, and enterprise systems in place and running. Often seen as arcane and nerdy, this stereotype was aptly portrayed in the TV Sitcom 'The IT Crowd'. But most companies have other technologies that also run their businesses - production technologies, SCADA (supervisory control and data acquisition) tools in factories, eCommerce platforms for retail, broadcast playout, and so on. These are often outside of IT and run as a separate organisation, sometimes referred to as Operations Tech or 'OT'.?Third, you have tech that goes into the product - such as cars, appliances, or even smart meters. Lastly, in recent years, there has been a growth of marketing tech, which in many businesses is directly acquired by marketing teams.

A common and positive trend is that each of these types of technology is moving from erstwhile proprietary and often blackbox models for hardware and software, to much more standard and open systems. Today you would buy a broadcast automation system that will run on a windows server, which would have been unheard of a few years ago. A second trend is that many businesses are now starting to consolidate these towers of technology under a common organisation - because it makes obvious sense to have common governance, data exchange, cyber security, and architectural principles across these areas.

Which brings me to Neil's point. When you add all of this up, you might find that this is where much of the value of your organisation is actually created and captured. From a time when IT was effectively a maintenance job with specialized skills and tools, today it is the at the core of most organisational strategies. No company can hope to scale, make profits, or even survive if it gets its technology wrong. Even if the department is called IT, it's likely that it delivers and supports many of the other three pillars of technology as well.

The language barrier between IT and "the business" is a well documented one. IT organisations have used any number of approaches to ensure that the requirements and business priorities are well translated into technology plans. This has a traditionally spotty success rate given the?track record of many technology projects and programs. But the received wisdom is that IT needs to learn to speak the language of the business. Consequently architects, developers, analysts et al will go out of their way to mask technical jargon and 'dumb down' the technology whilst polishing their ability to understand and speak the jargon of the business instead.

Because every business has its own jargon. In broadcast you might be discussing 'topping and tailing', or 'as run' lists, whereas in consumer goods, you might be talking 'trade promos' and 'uplift'. So my suggestion is that the time has come for business to speak the language of IT. It is no longer acceptable to say 'I don't understand tech'. It isn't okay to be so disconnected from tech that you have to have it dumbed down for you.

Another point on which I have changed my own views: I fell into the technology industry via the internet, with no technical education. So I always tried to play to my strengths and put business first. But of late, I feel that doesn't always work because if you don't understand how tech works and what it can potentially do, you will always end up making marginal improvements to your business, or worse, just codifying how you currently run your business which may be far from optimal.

People who work in IT aren't the basement dwellers with their own lingo, that the stereotype suggests. Both IT organisations and business counterparts need to recognise this.?

#innovation #technology

Geoffrey Todd

Digital Insights

2 年

Good to hear from you Ved. Agree wholeheartedly that every business should have a deeper and more meaningful facility with 'tech'. There are many 'digital' consultants and initiatives that appear to view 'going digital' as a wholly separate/discrete direction - when actually it is the application of another toolset (evolution). The bigger shift is the effect of the Internet, which is not the same as simply being a tech-shift, though you get a better sense of the possibilities if you do embrace and understand some of the significant tech opportunities (revolution). Once upon a time you either needed to be or employ a specialist engineer to effectively run and own a car, but for many of us, today's vehicles have a virtually 'sealed for life compartment under the 'hood/bonnet' - only needing attention when the car tells you and going electric will only reinforce that requirement. However, I'm sure there is a strong business school case to analyse how tech has and continues to fundamentally change one major sector and that is the Advertising & Marketing industries. I have first hand experience for how being more open to being tech-savvy would have served the Ad industry better...More on that for another post. ATB Geof Todd

Gary McMillan

Managing Consultant ENR at Wipro

2 年

What if we look at that argument from other perspectives. Assume we all want to be healthy and work in a civilised society. Would IT be happy with their doctor talking like a medical journal? Happy with their HR Advisor talking in regulatory and legal jargon? Happy with their local politician using vague policy .... ah, they do that already. I believe the general population ARE significantly more Tech-Literate. At least in terms of technical possibilities and expectations. Having went through a sustained period of the "IT Crowd" preaching about AGILE and putting the "user at the centre". This argument seems like a significant backwards step. I would be cautious about using phrases like "dumbing down". Making something clear and accessible is not "dumbing down"? There are a multitude of quotes that support the counter argument. "If you can't explain it simply, you don't understand it well enough".

Maybe the same language but not the same dialect?! Let the experts bring in different perspectives, in whatever dialect - may help avoid groupthink! But sure, business does need to know the tech better now that - as you point out - it is a major and differentiating part of any product or service.

Neil Holden

AI Consultancy Co-Founder | CIO/CTO/CDO | Music Tech start-up | Investor | Advisor | Trustee

2 年

Long gone are the days that IT hide behind tin and wires Ved Sen. The consumerisation of technology means that technology teams must embrace and empathise with organisational challenges, the same way that organisations are now able to embrace and empathise with technology.... Modern technologists are more than able to do this, and bring much needed alternative thinking to business...

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了