Short-Term Speculation Kills Prudence, Good Stewardship and Risk Management?
Yesterday I published a follow-up to my earlier post, "THE ELITE MEET IN DAVOS AS TRUMP, WHO THEY HELPED CREATE, IS INAUGURATED." https://lnkd.in/gmdx2_tR In my follow-up article I provided evidence that the large corporations, who are to be blamed for corrupting American politics and government, and for creating the conditions that put Trump back in power, are celebrating their stupidity. I cited the Financial Times report that US Executives at Davos are full of enthusiasm, plus the very large in-flows of foreign direct investment which are at record levels. In my comments I suggested this is all based on reckless short-term speculative actions with proper risk management, prudence and stewardship having been thrown out.
As further evidence of that let me cite two additional articles in the Financial Times from today and yesterday. The article yesterday was titled “the mother of all bubbles.” In it Ruchir Sharma, ??chair of Rockefeller International, said “The US has never been so overhyped, relative to the rest of the world.” He observes that, “Relative prices are the highest since data began over a century ago and relative valuations are at a peak since data began half a century ago.”
Some of the US premium is justified, in his view. But he notes, “global investors are committing more capital to a single country than ever before in modern history.” He suggests, “The overwhelming consensus is that the gap between the US and the world is justified by the earnings power of top US companies, their global reach and their leading role in tech innovation.” He acknowledges that “these strengths are all real.” But, he adds, “Awe of “American exceptionalism” in markets has now gone too far.”
Sharma observes that, “This is not a bubble in US markets, it’s mania in global markets.” That, “America’s share of global stock markets is far greater than its 27 per cent share of the global economy.” And that, “the US market did not trade at nearly so vast a premium to the rest of the world” during the 2000 Dotcom bubble.
He concludes, “Investors still like to believe that fundamentals drive prices and sentiment. But there comes a time when sentiment starts to drive fundamentals.” And this trend has been massively increased following Trump’s election. As a result, “America is over-owned, overvalued and overhyped to a degree never seen before,” resulting in “the mother of all bubbles in US markets.”
The article today is titled “US stocks at most expensive relative to bonds since dotcom era.” It notes, “US equities have soared to their most expensive level relative to government bonds in a generation, amid growing nervousness among some investors over high valuations of megacap technology companies and other Wall Street stocks.”
And to my point about the lack of prudence, proper risk management and good stewardship, ?Ben Inker, co-head of asset allocation at asset manager GMO says, “Investors are effectively saying ‘I want to own these dominant tech companies and I am prepared to do it without much of a risk premium,’” And he added, “I think that is a crazy attitude.”
The greatest risk is that so much of the investment is concentrated in a very small number of “Big Tech” stocks in a year when the uncertainty, that a Trump Presidency intensifies massively, ?means “this is the year where you want to be diversified on your equity exposure,” as Andrew Pease, chief investment strategist at Russell Investments rightly said.
Detail-Oriented Accounts Receivable & Payable Specialist | Proficient in Zoho Finance | Expertise in O2C, Reconciliations, and Credit Management
1 个月An insightful and thought-provoking analysis! It’s concerning to see short-term gains prioritized over long-term stability and responsibility. The lack of prudence and genuine stewardship among corporations could have far-reaching consequences, not just economically but socially and politically. Your article is a much-needed wake-up call to critically examine these reckless behaviors. Thank you for shedding light on this important issue.
Scenario based strategy author, consultant and lecturer
1 个月A sovereign debt crisis scenario in the making Paul Barnett A very plausible risk, especially since Trump has defaulted 6 times before. He knows that repaying debt is not a given but an option and negotiable. And given the US debt levels and over exposure of many financial institutions, this could be bigger than the GFC. A scenario that really needs serious attention.
Founder of Unstitution * building bridges + bridging divides * catalyzing community * mission critical regenerative pathways * emergent + strategic * collectively creating alternatives aligned with purpose
1 个月?? Paul Barnett, for inviting reflections on patterns observed. Not easy keeping up with all that's bubbling up from all the bubbles.?? The stark overarching reality that society is way-out-of-balance is perhaps old news - with the layering of yet more "events" as "symptoms." ? With the ever-dawning realization of what's nonviable for humanity + a living planet - we paradoxically face sobering perils + life-affirming possibilities. ? With anguish + hope, how can we co-navigate mindfully, consciously choosing ways of engaging, organizing, governing + innovating that don't [insidiously] continue to feed the degenerative dysfunctional patterns that contributed to this mess? What becomes unimpossible: ?? As more of us with "gifts differing" work together..."living the questions?"? ?? When coherent collective agency + co-creative capacity are liberated from human-made life-diminishing systems, structures + patterns?? ?? As we shape enabling contexts + conditions for the most important “work” of our time, humbly learning + adapting?? ?? As we re-pattern, doing what we can in big + little ways, "living into" alternatives that [over time] replace domination-oppression patterns? This is THE WORK - across all domains + scales.
The Blended Capital Group - ESG, Governance, Strategy and Finance Integration Leadership Focused on Impact Delivery
1 个月Like you said Paul Barnett, greed + short-term thinking, whether with investors, businesses or governments, is what has gotten us here with neoliberal policies over the last 45 years gradually widening inequalities. Gradually and then suddenly. As people go forward enthusiastically from Davos, are they even thinking about whether today's speculation becomes tomorrow's reality? what they could or would do if tomorrow's reality looks different? how this evolves over the next few years? the next few decades? My guess is that many leaders are so locked-into short-term neoliberal paradigms that they aren't even considering these kinds of questions.