Shifting from a Reactive to a Proactive Compliance Function

Shifting from a Reactive to a Proactive Compliance Function

In the ever-evolving landscape of regulatory compliance, government agencies worldwide are recognising the imperative shift from traditional reactive models to a more dynamic, proactive stance. This transformative mindset is not merely a strategic advantage but a necessity in today’s fast-paced world, where data and intelligence drive decision-making processes. Proactive compliance signifies a major departure from the status quo, requiring a comprehensive reorganisation of existing structures and programs that have historically focused on responding to non-compliance after it occurs. With compliance responsibilities expanding rapidly, especially in the financial services sector, it is crucial for companies to establish strong, efficient compliance functions. This shift not only prevents regulatory fines but also fosters an ethical corporate culture, guiding employees to make the right choices and ensuring long-term organisational integrity.

What strategies has your organisation implemented to shift from reactive to proactive compliance? Share your experiences in the comments below!

Reactive Compliance and Safety

So what does the more traditional reactive model look like? There is no one classic model, but it is possible to see several common characteristics with this form of operation. Firstly, reactive compliance involves taking action only after a breach has occurred. This often necessitates extensive monitoring and surveillance, followed by detailed investigations and audits to determine the cause of the breach. Such measures are inherently costly, ineffective and time-consuming. A significant drawback of reactive compliance is its inability to prevent breaches; the damage is often already done, leading to severe legal, financial and reputational consequences.

Another hallmark of reactive compliance is the focus on mitigating the negative outcomes rather than addressing the root causes of non-compliance. This often results in repeat violations, as the underlying issues remain unresolved. Legal and Risk & Compliance teams are frequently left firefighting issues, spending considerable resources to manage crises rather than preventing them.

Reactive compliance may include situations where companies respond to errors flagged by regulators in their reported legal entity management data. The company must then commit extensive time and resources to rectify the matter. Furthermore, reactive compliance is evident when leaders view compliance as a necessary evil, wait for auditors to dictate improvements, fail to measure compliance program effectiveness, push compliance responsibilities onto frontline workers, and require constant persuasion to invest in compliance measures. These behaviours indicate a lack of ownership and commitment to a robust compliance culture, ultimately stunting the growth and integrity of the business. There needs to be another approach.

Access the full article via this link

For more articles, please visit our website | The Compliance Digest


Managing Regulatory Obligations Across Multiple Jurisdictions

In an increasingly globalised world, businesses operate across multiple jurisdictions, each with its own set of regulatory frameworks. Managing regulatory obligations in this complex landscape presents significant challenges. Variations in legal requirements, cultural nuances, and enforcement practices can create compliance burdens that are both costly and time-consuming. Companies must navigate differing standards for financial reporting, data protection, environmental regulations and labour laws, often with conflicting or overlapping requirements. The constant evolution of regulations further complicates this task, requiring businesses to stay vigilant and adaptable. Additionally, the lack of harmonisation across jurisdictions can lead to inefficiencies and an increased risk of non-compliance, which can result in severe penalties, reputational damage and operational disruptions. The two news stories that follow give ample evidence of the challenges faced.

What strategies has your organisation adopted to navigate the complexities of multi-jurisdictional compliance? Share your insights in the comments below!

Regulatory Failures Across Multiple Jurisdictions

Deutsche Bank, along with other global financial institutions, became entangled in the ‘cum-ex’ trading scandal, a large-scale tax evasion scheme. The complex nature of different tax regulations across European jurisdictions allowed traders to claim multiple refunds for taxes that were never paid. This resulted in an estimated €55.2 billion loss to European treasuries. The challenge of navigating diverse regulatory environments contributed to significant financial penalties and reputational damage for the banks involved.

Wells Fargo faced immense regulatory challenges after it was revealed that employees had opened millions of unauthorised accounts to meet aggressive sales targets. Operating across multiple jurisdictions with varying regulatory standards, the bank struggled to implement consistent compliance practices. This led to a $3 billion settlement with U.S. authorities and severe reputational harm, emphasising the difficulty of managing uniform compliance in a multi-jurisdictional landscape.

Managing regulatory obligations in this globalised setting is undoubtedly a complex task that requires a strategic approach. What can institutions do to tighten their grip? This article explores a range of strategies that can be employed to significantly improve the effectiveness of cross-border and multi-jurisdictional operations. ??

Access the full article via this link

For more articles, please visit our website | The Compliance Digest


Upcoming

Events & Conferences


16 September 2024 | Cyber Security in Financial Services Summit 2024

16-18 September 2024 | Announcing the GFMI 5th Edition of the Operational Resilience for Financial Institutions Conference

17-18 September 2024 | 2nd Annual Women in AML & Sanctions Forum

24-25 September 2024 | Ignite Innovation at Africa Fintech Forum 2024: Join Us in Nairobi for the Premier Finance & Technology Convergence!


To stay updated on the latest happenings and upcoming events, explore our Events & Conferences section | Discover dynamic forums designed to foster networking opportunities and knowledge-sharing within your specific community or field.


要查看或添加评论,请登录

The Association of Governance, Risk & Compliance (AGRC)的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了