Shaping a Greener Future: Navigating the Path to Low-Carbon Glass – PART 2
Technological Evidence in a Risk-Averse Industry
The majority of glass-melting furnace technology has roots stretching back over a century. Over time, advancements have brought significant energy efficiency gains and emission reductions. However, many of these improvements were made under the assumption that fossil fuel energy would remain inexpensive. This assumption is rapidly changing, much faster than many anticipate, as energy markets evolve and the focus shifts toward decarbonization by 2030.
While these advancements have improved efficiency, they often involve more complex technologies, leading to increased maintenance requirements, higher CAPEX, the use of non-environmentally friendly chemicals, and reduced equipment lifespan. Glass manufacturers, already dealing with the complexities of the melting process, are generally reluctant to introduce further complexities. Their preference is to focus on their core business, avoiding the operational and staffing challenges posed by highly complex industrial installations.
For decades, simplicity and local production have been critical to the industry’s strategy, as glass doesn’t transport well. However, in today’s rapidly evolving world, efforts to extend furnace lifespans by 15 years or more may hinder innovation. Most glass manufacturers only get one opportunity every 10 to 15 years to implement new melting technology. The need for long-term commitment makes manufacturers highly risk-averse. As a result, technological development must provide robust evidence of improvements. Without it, the industry risks relying on outdated practices driven more by policy than innovation.
Time Is Running Out
Considering the average lifespan of a glass furnace is around 15 years, the industry is likely less than two furnace repair cycles away from the need to achieve carbon neutrality. While this may seem like ample time, it isn’t.?
When discussing the major obstacles to decarbonization, several challenges frequently arise:
???? ??????????? Green Energy Supply: Will there be sufficient green electricity available at the facility?
???? ??????????? Reliability and Timeliness: Can this energy be delivered reliably and on time?
???? ??????????? Facility Integration: Can green energy infrastructure be integrated into existing facilities without substantial reconfiguration?
???? ??????????? Affordability: Will the overall cost, including CAPEX and OPEX, be viable over the furnace’s lifetime?
领英推荐
???? ??????????? New Business Models: Will alternative models, such as furnace-as-a-service, emerge to address knowledge gaps and financing challenges?
Addressing Related Technical Issues
In addition to these larger challenges, the industry must tackle technical hurdles, including:
???? ??????????? How can we make all-electric furnace designs more adaptable?
???? ??????????? What lifespans can we expect from hybrid furnaces?
???? ??????????? Will new furnace designs integrate seamlessly into existing plants?
The journey to carbon neutrality is a complex one, demanding innovation, collaboration, and swift action. The urgency to tackle these challenges is clear. Delaying could result in missed opportunities to secure a sustainable future for glass manufacturing.
Schneider Electric stands ready to guide the industry through this transformation. With cutting-edge technology, expert collaboration, and a strong commitment to sustainability, Schneider Electric is helping manufacturers achieve their carbon-neutral goals while optimizing efficiency and long-term success. The time to act is now, and Schneider Electric is here to support every step of the way.?
End of part 2, part 3 will follow soon.
special opal cups dinnerware ,pyrex ilike nurex glass cookware n kitchen ware
1 个月Using just silica and more heat would be the solution
Research Engineer / Combustion Specialist
1 个月I have a question about the specific emissions in this diagram. Why is the reduction almost linear up to about 2000, and then linear again, but with a reduced gradient from 2000 onward? If I recall correctly, the glass industry started in the early 20th century with producer gas, then switched to fuel oil and then to natural gas and to some degree electricity. Does the carbon intensity of the fuels have so little impact? This diagram indicates that the GHG reduction is almost completely driven by process efficiency, while the effects of the different fuels are negligible. Is this interpretation correct?