Setting the ventilator with AI support: challenges and perspectives

Fritsch, S.J., Cecconi, M. Setting the ventilator with AI support: challenges and perspectives. Intensive Care Med (2025). https://doi.org/10.1007/s00134-024-07778-w

Summary of "Setting the Ventilator with AI Support: Challenges and Perspectives"

Abstract

Artificial Intelligence (AI) is increasingly being explored as a tool to optimize mechanical ventilation (MV) settings in intensive care units (ICUs). Traditional lung-protective ventilation strategies are evolving toward individualized approaches, yet setting ventilators remains complex due to the dynamic nature of lung mechanics. AI-based models have the potential to enhance MV management by improving pattern recognition, reducing ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), and optimizing weaning strategies. This editorial reviews current AI applications in ventilation, the challenges in implementation, and the future potential of AI-driven decision support in MV.

Key Points

1. Complexity of Ventilator Management: Setting the ventilator optimally requires continuous adjustments based on patient physiology, lung mechanics, and evolving disease states. Suboptimal settings contribute to prolonged MV duration, patient-ventilator asynchrony, and increased morbidity.
2. Potential of AI in MV Optimization: AI can analyze vast amounts of ICU data, including ventilatory waveforms, arterial blood gas (ABG) data, and imaging, to recommend personalized ventilatory settings tailored to the patient's specific phenotype.
3. Current AI Applications in MV: AI has been used in reinforcement learning models to optimize ventilator settings, detect flow starvation, and predict mechanical power, a parameter linked to VILI risk.
4. Limitations of Closed-Loop Ventilation Systems: Existing closed-loop systems rely on a limited number of input features and have yet to integrate the full potential of AI for personalized ventilation adjustments.
5. Challenges in AI Implementation: Barriers to AI integration include the lack of standardized data formats, ethical concerns regarding patient consent, and regulatory hurdles for AI-driven medical devices.
6. Importance of Data Integration: AI models must incorporate diverse ICU data, including real-time respiratory mechanics, ABG results, and thoracic imaging, to provide a holistic approach to MV management.
7. Need for Rigorous Validation: AI-based ventilation models must undergo extensive in silico testing before clinical implementation. Prospective randomized trials are needed to validate their impact on patient outcomes.
8. Physician Reluctance Toward AI-Based Ventilation: ICU clinicians remain cautious about fully autonomous AI-driven ventilators due to concerns over loss of control and potential safety risks. AI should function as a decision-support tool rather than an autonomous system.
9. Dealing with AI Model Deterioration Over Time: AI predictive performance may decline as patient demographics and ICU treatment practices evolve. Continuous model retraining presents regulatory challenges, as updates may require re-certification.
10. Future Directions in AI for Ventilation: If these challenges are addressed, AI could revolutionize MV by providing real-time, adaptive ventilation strategies that improve patient outcomes while reducing clinician workload.

Conclusion

AI-driven ventilator management holds great promise but remains in an early stage of clinical application. While AI-based decision support systems could optimize MV settings, improve weaning strategies, and reduce VILI risk, their successful implementation will require overcoming significant technical, regulatory, and clinical acceptance challenges. Future research should focus on integrating AI models into real-time clinical workflows and validating their impact in randomized clinical trials.

ACCESS FULL ARTICLE HERE

Discussion Questions

1. How can AI-driven ventilator management be safely integrated into ICU workflows while maintaining physician oversight?
2. What strategies can be employed to improve clinician trust in AI-based MV decision support systems?
3. Should AI models for MV be continuously updated based on real-world ICU data, or should they undergo periodic re-certification to ensure safety and reliability?

Javier Amador-Casta?eda, BHS, RRT, FCCM

Interprofessional Critical Care Network (ICCN)

Take Advantage of This Resource

I encourage you to explore this growing library of articles and leverage it to stay informed on the latest in critical care. Visit the collection today at: https://perfusfind.com/ic/

This is another step in making high-quality, evidence-based information easily accessible to the critical care community. As always, thank you for your continued support!

As always, don’t forget to like, share, and subscribe. See you on the other side!

Open Access This article is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial 4.0 International License, which permits any non-commercial use, sharing, adaptation, distribution and reproduction in any medium or format, as long as you give appropriate credit to the original author(s) and the source, provide a link to the Creative Commons licence, and indicate if changes were made. The images or other third party material in this article are included in the article's Creative Commons licence, unless indicated otherwise in a credit line to the material. If material is not included in the article's Creative Commons licence and your intended use is not permitted by statutory regulation or exceeds the permitted use, you will need to obtain permission directly from the copyright holder. To view a copy of this licence, visit https://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc/4.0/.