Server-Side Rendering (SSR) vs Client-Side Rendering (CSR) in Web Development
Harshal Sawatkar
Full stack developer | Ex Core Team member THM | Open-source | Gen-AI
In the realm of web development, the debate between Server-Side Rendering (SSR) and Client-Side Rendering (CSR) has been a longstanding one. Each approach comes with its own set of advantages and considerations, impacting the performance and user experience of web applications. Let's explore the differences between SSR and CSR, along with their respective pros and cons.
Server-Side Rendering (SSR)
Overview: Server-Side Rendering (SSR) involves generating the complete HTML content on the server before sending it to the client's browser. This results in faster initial page loads and better search engine optimization (SEO).
Pros:
Cons:
Client-Side Rendering (CSR)
Overview: Client-Side Rendering (CSR) involves rendering the web page on the client's browser using JavaScript. This allows for dynamic updates and interactions without constant server requests.
领英推荐
Pros:
Cons:
The React.js Perspective
Default Approach: React.js default behavior leans towards Client-Side Rendering (CSR), where components are rendered on the client-side.
Next.js: For those seeking the benefits of Server-Side Rendering (SSR), Next.js provides a robust solution with server-side rendering capabilities.
Next.js: Exploring Rendering Options