The Sensorimotor Paradigm: A Revolutionary Approach for Early Detection and Intervention in Alzheimer's Disease

The Sensorimotor Paradigm: A Revolutionary Approach for Early Detection and Intervention in Alzheimer's Disease

Abstract

Sensory and motor dysfunctions, including vision and hearing loss, gait disturbances, postural balance issues, apraxia, and slowed walking, are increasingly recognized as early indicators of Alzheimer’s disease (AD). Emerging evidence suggests that these impairments may manifest years before noticeable cognitive decline, serving as early markers for AD progression. This article synthesizes findings from epidemiological, neuropathological, and neurophysiological studies to explore the role of sensory and motor dysfunctions in AD. It further discusses potential therapeutic strategies, including sensory stimulation, physical activity programs, and occupational therapy, highlighting their implications for early intervention and patient care.

?Keywords: Alzheimer’s Disease;?Sensory Impairments;?Motor Dysfunction;?40 Hz Gamma; Cognitive Decline

Introduction

Alzheimer’s disease (AD) is a chronic neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cognitive impairment and is the leading cause of dementia in older adults (Liu, 2022).

Hallmark pathologies amyloid plaques and tau tangles accumulate in the brain years before clinical memory deficits emerge, making early detection of AD crucial for timely intervention.


Conventionally, sensory and motor dysfunctions have been studied separately from cognitive decline in AD, but emerging research suggests these domains are interconnected (Buchman & Bennett, 2011). Traditionally, memory loss, cognitive decline, and functional impairment have been the focus of AD’s onset; however, increasing evidence highlights that subtle sensory and motor dysfunctions often precede these classic cognitive symptoms by several years, signifying an increased risk for developing AD (Albers et al., 2015). In particular, research suggests that deficits in vision, hearing, and motor coordination can manifest several years before a formal AD diagnosis (Buchman, 2011).

?Identifying these early non-cognitive signs is important because it offers a window for early intervention. By recognizing sensory and motor changes as potential early indicators of AD, clinicians may be able to initiate preventive strategies or treatments sooner, potentially slowing disease progression and improving patient outcomes.

Established Knowledge and Emerging Research

The relationship between sensory-motor function and Alzheimer's disease spans a continuum from well-established findings to emerging hypotheses. To provide clarity, this review distinguishes between these categories throughout:

Well-established findings are those supported by multiple large-scale longitudinal studies, meta-analyses, or systematic reviews. These include the association between hearing loss and increased dementia risk (Lin et al., 2013; Bucholc et al., 2022), the predictive value of gait speed decline for cognitive deterioration (Montero-Odasso et al., 2020), and the cognitive benefits of physical exercise in AD patients (Liu et al., 2022). These relationships have been consistently demonstrated across diverse populations and methodologies.

Emerging research represents more recent findings that, while promising, require further validation. This includes concepts such as the "dual decline phenotype" (Montero-Odasso et al., 2020), the potential therapeutic effects of 40 Hz sensory stimulation (McNett et al., 2023), and the composite sensorimotor assessment for predicting cognitive impairment (Sayyid et al., 2024). These newer areas show significant potential but may be based on smaller sample sizes, shorter follow-up periods, or novel methodological approaches that await wider replication.

By distinguishing between these categories, this review aims to provide clinicians and researchers with a clear understanding of which findings can guide current practice and which represent promising directions for future investigation. Throughout the article, established findings are presented as foundational knowledge, while emerging research is discussed in terms of its potential implications and the need for further study.

Early Manifestations

Vision and Hearing Loss

A growing body of research indicates that impairments in vision and hearing may foreshadow the development of Alzheimer’s disease, often emerging long before noticeable memory loss. Epidemiological studies have found that older adults with sensory impairments are at increased risk for later cognitive decline. For example, a longitudinal study of 639 adults over ~12 years showed a dose-dependent relationship between hearing loss and dementia risk: mild hearing loss nearly doubled the risk of dementia, moderate loss tripled the risk, and severe hearing impairment was associated with a five-fold higher risk (Lin, 2011). In a 2024 analysis of the Maastricht Aging Study, investigators found that participants who developed hearing loss experienced an accelerated decline in memory and executive function.

Importantly, the onset of hearing loss often precedes cognitive symptoms temporally -- one study reported that hearing decline was observed before measurable cognitive decline by several years (Soons, 2024), though this temporal relationship does not necessarily establish causation.

?The mechanisms linking hearing loss to dementia are not fully causal but are thought to involve both neurobiological and psychosocial factors. Hearing impairment may accelerate brain atrophy and increase the cognitive load of listening, and it can lead to social isolation – all of which might contribute to or exacerbate cognitive decline.

?Similarly, vision loss has been identified as a potential early warning sign. A 2021 systematic review and meta-analysis found that visual impairment is associated with about a 38% greater risk of developing dementia compared to those with normal vision (Ku?ma, 2021).

In particular, untreated ophthalmologic conditions like cataracts and diabetic retinopathy were linked to elevated dementia risk in older adults (Ku?ma, 2021). These findings suggest that sensory declines (such as needing hearing aids or new glasses) in an older adult should not be written off simply as normal aging, since they may precede and predict the onset of AD-related cognitive impairment by several years.

Gait and Postural Balance Disturbances

Beyond the senses, changes in motor abilities – especially gait (walking) and balance – are increasingly recognized as early manifestations of AD. It has long been observed that some otherwise healthy older individuals develop a slower, unsteady gait or postural balance problems years before any memory issues arise. Recent studies have quantified this effect.

In other words, an older adult’s walking speed may begin to slow markedly (beyond what is expected for age) up to 10+ years prior to the diagnosis of mild cognitive impairment (MCI) or dementia. Gait changes associated with emerging cognitive decline include reduced walking speed, increased gait variability, and difficulty dual-tasking (e.g. walking while talking) – all indicating early dysfunction in the integration of motor and cognitive brain networks. Balance disturbances are also significant. Even subtle problems with postural stability or a higher frequency of falls can be red flags. One study of cognitively normal seniors reported that individuals with preclinical AD pathology (evidenced by high amyloid in the brain) had twice the annual rate of falls compared to peers without AD changes (Stark, 2013).

Notably, these participants had no obvious cognitive deficits yet – suggesting that neural changes in AD can affect motor control and postural balance well before memory is impaired. Taken together, these findings imply that clinicians should monitor gait and postural balance in older adults: a slower gait or increased falls in an otherwise healthy senior might warrant further cognitive evaluation or brain imaging to check for early AD changes.

Apraxia and Slowed Walking

In the context of AD, “apraxia” refers to impairment in the ability to perform learned purposeful movements, despite intact motor function. Apraxia often affects complex tasks (like using tools, dressing, or coordinating sequential movements) and is commonly observed in moderate-to-late stages of Alzheimer’s. However, research indicates that mild forms of apraxia can appear early, even at the stage of MCI that often precedes AD. In a clinical study assessing motor skills, patients with MCI showed measurable deficits on apraxia tests compared to healthy controls (Ward et al., 2024).

?This suggests that difficulties in motor planning or executing multi-step movements may be one of the early symptoms of AD in some individuals. For example, an older adult in the very early phase of AD might begin to have trouble coordinating clothing fasteners or mimicking hand movements – signs of emerging ideomotor apraxia – while still scoring normally on memory tests. Alongside such specific motor planning issues, general motor slowing is another early indicator. Slowed walking is a form of bradykinesia (slowness of movement) that can be quantified by gait speed. Research has linked slower gait in aging not only to falls but also to future cognitive decline. Even among individuals diagnosed with MCI, those with slower walking speeds are more likely to progress to AD dementia in subsequent years (Buchman, & Bennett, 2011).

In fact, lower overall motor function and a faster rate of motor decline in otherwise cognitively intact elders have been found to predict the development of MCI and AD down the line(Buchman, & Bennett, 2011).

This encompasses not only gait slowing but also reduced fine motor performance and weakness. The presence of mild Parkinsonian motor signs – such as slight rigidity, tremor, or shuffling gait – in an older person without Parkinson’s disease has also been associated with a higher risk of later AD (Buchman, & Bennett, 2011).

In summary, motor deficits like apraxia and an unsteady, slowed gait should raise concern: they often coincide with neurodegenerative changes and can signal that a patient with mild cognitive complaints is more likely to convert to AD in the near future.

Recent Research Findings

Several recent studies corroborate the importance of sensory and motor dysfunctions as early indicators of Alzheimer’s disease, and they shed light on how these deficits relate to disease progression:

Hearing Impairment and Cognitive Decline

Prospective cohort studies have solidified hearing loss as a notable risk factor for cognitive deterioration (Concei??o Santos de Oliveira, 2023).

Hearing loss is not just a symptom of brain aging but a harbinger of impending dementia. Complementary findings come from a large 2022 observational study that reported that older adults with self-reported hearing impairment had over twice the hazard of developing MCI compared to those with normal hearing (Bucholc et al., 2022). Intriguingly, that same study showed that treating hearing loss may modify this risk – older adults who used hearing aids had no significant difference in risk of MCI compared to peers with normal hearing (Bucholc et al., 2022).

This suggests that correcting sensory deficits could potentially delay or prevent progression to cognitive impairment. Such findings have spurred ongoing clinical trials (e.g. the ACHIEVE trial) to test whether hearing intervention slows cognitive decline (Bucholc et. al., 2022).

Visual Deficits and Dementia Risk

Visual dysfunction has similarly come under scrutiny. Epidemiological research over the past few years indicates that poorer vision is linked to worse cognitive trajectories. A meta-analysis by Ku?ma et al. (2021) combined data from 30 studies and found that older adults with visual impairment had a significantly higher incidence of all-cause dementia (pooled risk ratio ~1.38) compared to those without vision problems (Ku?ma et al., 2021).

Additionally, specific eye diseases were implicated: for example, having cataracts or diabetic retinopathy was associated with a modest increase in dementia hazard (Ku?ma et al., 2021).?

These associations remained after controlling for age and other factors. The implication is that visual impairment might be an early marker of brain changes or an exacerbating factor for cognitive decline (possibly due to reduced sensory input and social engagement). As a result, vision health is now recognized as part of dementia risk profiles – some experts advocate that routine eye exams and timely treatment of ocular conditions might form one piece of an early dementia prevention strategy (Ku?ma et al., 2021).?

Ongoing studies (Ehrlich et. al., 2022) are examining whether improving vision (through cataract surgery or vision correction) can positively impact cognitive outcomes in at-risk seniors. Also, visual impairments, including decreased contrast sensitivity and retinal nerve fiber thinning, have been linked to increased AD risk (Ehrlich et al., 2022).

Conceptual Framework: Motor Cognitive Risk

Before exploring specific research on gait changes, it is important to establish the conceptual framework of "motor cognitive risk" (MCR) that has emerged in recent literature. First proposed by Verghese et al. (2013), MCR represents a pre-dementia syndrome characterized by the co-existence of subjective cognitive complaints and slow gait in older adults without dementia or mobility disability. This concept provides a clinical framework for understanding how motor and cognitive domains interact in the early stages of neurodegeneration.

The MCR construct is built on four key components:

  • Slow gait speed: Typically defined as a walking speed below age- and sex-adjusted norms, often set at <0.8 m/s or at the lowest quartile of the study population.
  • Subjective cognitive complaints: Self-reported concerns about memory or thinking, without meeting criteria for mild cognitive impairment or dementia.
  • Preserved activities of daily living: Maintaining functional independence despite subtle cognitive and motor changes.
  • Absence of dementia diagnosis: Ensuring that the syndrome represents a pre-dementia state rather than established disease.

MCR has demonstrated predictive validity for incident dementia, with a nearly three-fold increased risk in those meeting MCR criteria compared to those who do not (Verghese et al., 2013). This framework allows clinicians to identify at-risk individuals using simple, low-cost assessments that can be implemented in primary care settings, without requiring specialized neuropsychological testing or neuroimaging.

The following sections discuss how recent research has expanded upon this framework, exploring specific patterns of gait disturbance and their relationship to cognitive trajectory.

Gait Changes and “Motor Cognitive” Risk

Neurologists have observed that the trajectory of gait degradation often parallels – and can anticipate – cognitive decline. Montero-Odasso’s concept of the “dual decline” phenotype (simultaneous worsening of gait and cognition) has been a focus of recent research. In their 2020 study, older adults who exhibited both gait slowing and mild cognitive decline (“dual decliners”) were over three times more likely to develop dementia than those with decline in either domain alone (Montero-Odasso et. al., 2020).

Furthermore, the authors highlighted that gait speed decrease can precede cognitive decline by a decade or more (Montero-Odasso et. al., 2020), reinforcing gait velocity as a predictive biomarker. Other longitudinal studies echo these findings: for instance, Buracchio et al. (2010) showed gait speed started deteriorating up to 12 years before MCI onset in initially healthy elders.

The biological explanation is that brain regions responsible for motor control (such as the frontal lobes, basal ganglia, and their white-matter connections) are affected early in AD, even before the classic memory centers are devastated. Consistent with this, high gait variability and postural balance impairments correlate with cortical atrophy patterns seen in early AD (Montero-Odasso et. al., 2020). A study by Stark (Stark et al., 2013) demonstrated that individuals with preclinical AD pathology had twice the annual rate of falls compared to cognitively normal older adults.

Clinically, this research is influencing practice by encouraging the use of simple gait assessments or postural balance tests as part of geriatric cognitive evaluations. A person’s walking speed, stride length, or ability to maintain postural balance in challenging positions (tandem stance, etc.) might be monitored over time as an indicator of neurodegenerative change.

Multisensory and Motor Integration in Early AD

Cutting-edge research is now looking at sensory and motor functions in combination, rather than in isolation, to improve early detection of dementia. A recent 2024 study by (Sayyid et. al., 2024) used structural equation modeling on a large aging cohort to evaluate how multisensory ability (vision, hearing, vestibular function, etc.), fine motor skills, and gross motor performance collectively relate to early cognitive impairment. They found all three domains to be significant – individuals with stronger sensory function and better motor performance had substantially lower odds of meeting criteria for early cognitive impairment.

For example, for each unit improvement in a combined multisensory score, the odds of early cognitive impairment dropped by about 32%, while better fine motor dexterity (e.g. faster pegboard test times) reduced the odds by ~30%.

Gross motor function (including measures of gait and postural balance) also showed a positive trend (approx. 12% reduction per unit, though with a wider confidence interval).

These findings underscore that AD’s prodromal phase may involve a broad degradation of sensorimotor systems. The study’s implications are twofold: first, a composite sensorimotor assessment could enhance the prediction of who is likely to develop cognitive impairment; second, it suggests that interventions aiming to preserve sensory and motor function might indirectly help maintain cognitive health.

In line with this, other research has shown that neurodegeneration in AD is not confined to memory centers – for instance, tau protein pathology (one of the key AD proteins) has been detected in higher-order motor planning regions even at the MCI stage, linking directly to motor deficits in those patients. Overall, recent studies reinforce that sensory and motor changes are integral to AD’s early clinical presentation and not just secondary effects of aging. They open the door to new approaches in risk assessment – such as a “motor cognitive risk” score combining gait speed and cognitive complaints – to identify high-risk individuals before dementia sets in.

The Sensorimotor Paradigm Shift: Rethinking Neurodegeneration

Reconceptualizing Disease Progression and Intervention

For decades, the prevailing model of neurodegenerative disease has been predominantly biochemical and genetic, with conditions like Alzheimer's and Parkinson's conceptualized primarily as disorders of protein misfolding, neurotransmitter deficiency, or genetic predisposition (Selkoe, 2002; Goedert, 2015). This framework naturally led to intervention strategies focused on pharmacological agents targeting these molecular mechanisms. However, increasing evidence suggests this approach may address the consequences rather than the origins of neurodegeneration (Kritchevsky, 2010).

A paradigm shift is emerging that recognizes sensory and motor dysfunctions not merely as symptoms but as active contributors to disease pathogenesis and progression (Rocchi et al., 2002; Seidler et al., 2010). This shift is supported by several key observations: first, sensorimotor deficits often precede cognitive and classical disease symptoms by years or even decades (Postuma et al., 2012); second, intact sensorimotor function appears to provide resilience against neurodegeneration (Stern, 2012); and third, targeted sensorimotor interventions demonstrate promising results in modifying disease trajectories (Morris et al., 2017).

The Neuroplastic Foundation

The potency of sensorimotor approaches may lie in their direct engagement with neuroplasticity—the brain's fundamental ability to reorganize and adapt (Pascual-Leone et al., 2005). Unlike pharmacological interventions that often target single biochemical pathways, sensorimotor activities engage multiple neural networks simultaneously, creating cascading effects that influence cellular health, network connectivity, and system-wide integration (Kleim & Jones, 2008).

Sensory and motor processes are not peripheral to brain function but constitute much of what the brain does. The sensorimotor system comprises approximately 70% of the brain's volume and energy consumption (Shadmehr & Krakauer, 2008). This expansive neural real estate creates abundant opportunities for intervention. When we engage sensorimotor systems through structured stimulation, we activate vast neural territories that can influence and potentially compensate for degenerating regions through functional reorganization and enhanced connectivity (Nudo, 2013).

Beyond Symptomatic Treatment: Addressing Causal Mechanisms

The sensorimotor approach represents more than symptomatic management—it potentially addresses causal mechanisms underlying neurodegeneration. Several mechanisms may explain why sensorimotor interventions could fundamentally alter disease progression:

Enhanced neural synchrony

Coordinated sensory input and motor output create rhythmic neural activity that promotes functional connectivity between brain regions, potentially countering the network disconnection that characterizes neurodegeneration (Bressler & Menon, 2010).

Metabolic optimization

Sensorimotor engagement increases brain-derived neurotrophic factor (BDNF) and improves cerebral blood flow, creating an environment conducive to neural repair and resistance to pathological protein accumulation (Cotman et al., 2007).

Reserve and resilience building

Regular sensorimotor engagement builds cognitive and neural reserve that can compensate for early disease-related losses, effectively raising the threshold at which pathology produces symptoms (Stern, 2009).

Autonomic regulation

As highlighted in Synchronic Well-being? technology, sensorimotor approaches can modulate autonomic nervous system function, potentially restoring the balance between sympathetic and parasympathetic activity often disturbed in neurodegenerative conditions (Thayer & Lane, 2009).

Clinical Implications and Future Directions

This reconceptualization suggests we should fundamentally rethink our approach to neurodegenerative diseases. Rather than waiting for biochemical symptoms to appear before intervention, the sensorimotor paradigm advocates for proactive engagement of these systems throughout the lifespan particularly in at-risk populations (Naismith et al., 2010).

The emerging model calls for multimodal approaches that integrate sensory stimulation, motor training, and autonomic regulation into comprehensive intervention strategies. Technologies like Synchronic Well-being?, 40 Hz stimulation, and targeted physical exercise programs represent early examples of this approach, but we have likely only begun to explore the potential of sensorimotor interventions (Cassilhas et al., 2016).

Perhaps most importantly, this paradigm shift reminds us that the brain is fundamentally an organ of action and interaction with the environment. Its health depends not merely on the internal medium biochemical homeostasis but on continued, meaningful engagement with the sensory world and expressiveness through motor action (Wolpert et al., 2011). This ecological view of brain health may ultimately prove more fruitful than reductionist biochemical approaches in addressing the complex challenges of neurodegeneration.

Potential Therapeutic Approaches

Recognizing sensory and motor dysfunctions as early signs of Alzheimer’s is valuable not only for diagnosis but also because these domains represent actionable targets for intervention. A comprehensive care plan for patients at risk of AD or in the early stages of the disease can incorporate therapies to support sensory and motor function, slow cognitive decline and preserve independence. Below we discuss several such approaches:

Sensory Stimulation Therapies

Non-invasive sensory stimulation has emerged as an innovative avenue to potentially bolster neural function in AD. One exciting area of research involves light and sound therapy at specific frequencies. Animal studies have shown that exposing AD model mice to stimuli flashing or pulsing at 40 Hz (gamma frequency) can entrain brainwave oscillations and reduce AD pathology. For example, 40 Hz light flicker and auditory tone stimulation in mice led to reductions in amyloid plaques and tau tangles, preserved synaptic connections, and even improved the animals’ motor performance tsailaboratory.mit.edu.

These findings from the Li-Huei Tsai laboratory at MIT suggest that boosting the brain’s gamma rhythms may enhance the brain’s own cleaning processes (like microglial activity) and strengthen neural networks and slow cognitive decline (Murdock et al., 2024). Building on this preclinical work, early-phase human trials have been conducted to test feasibility. In one recent pilot study, patients with MCI or early AD were given daily 40 Hz light-and-sound stimulation via a digital device for several months (McNett et al., 2023).

In short, the induction of 40?Hz neural oscillations in Alzheimer's disease has demonstrated promising results in reducing the and tau load, which are hallmarks of the disease. This approach, which involves non-invasive exposure to flickering lights, is distinct from pharmacological interventions that aim to restore gamma oscillations and reduce and tau levels through drug administration (Clements-Cortes et al., 2016; Chan et al., 2021; Cimenser et al., 2021). This new way of thinking may offer a novel way to achieve the necessary breakthroughs in Alzheimer's disease treatment (Adaikkan & Tsai, 2020).

The therapy – sometimes termed “GENUS” (Gamma ENtrainment Using Sensory stimuli) – was found to be safe and tolerable, and preliminary cognitive outcomes were promising. Some participants showed improvements or stabilization on cognitive tests (e.g. the MoCA) over 6 months, whereas one might expect decline in untreated AD (McNett et al., 2023).

Another promising approach to sensory stimulation is Synchronic Well-being? technology (2024), which utilizes multisensory and motor adaptive techniques to modulate the Autonomic Nervous System (ANS) https://www.dhirubhai.net/pulse/beyond-biofeedback-revolutionary-multimodal-sensory-autonomic-kullok-1kakf. This non-invasive technology presents carefully designed visual stimuli (moving and flashing geometric shapes) combined with ambient sounds on digital screens, creating dynamic multisensory environments that help balance the sympathetic and parasympathetic branches of the ANS. This promising non-invasive multisensory–motor technology is in its initial clinical validation stage.

The Synchronic Well-being? system incorporates principles of adaptive randomness and stochastic resonance, which may enhance neural plasticity and improve sensory processing. Similar to the 40 Hz stimulation approaches mentioned earlier, this technology aims to create synchronized sensory integration that could potentially support cognitive function in individuals with early AD signs. The adaptive algorithms select appropriate stimuli (including different spectral noise types) to maintain optimal engagement and promote desired ANS responses.

Particularly relevant for AD patients experiencing sensory and motor deficits, the technology includes an interactive eye-hand coordination component that engages users in precision tracking exercises. This may be beneficial since motor planning and coordination often deteriorate early in AD progression. While specific clinical trials for AD applications are still needed, the approach aligns with emerging evidence suggesting multisensory integration and ANS modulation could play supportive roles in managing early cognitive decline.

While these are early results, they suggest a possible association between sensory stimulation and slower AD progression, potentially related to changes in neural circuit function, though causal mechanisms remain to be fully established. Beyond gamma entrainment, other sensory therapies are also being explored. Music therapy and tailored auditory stimulation have been reported to improve mood and sometimes memory in dementia patients, likely by activating widespread neural networks. Visual stimulation (like exposure to nature videos or virtual reality) and multisensory environments (e.g. Snoezelen rooms that provide soothing light, sound, and tactile experiences) are used in dementia care to increase engagement and may have short-term benefits on anxiety and cognition.

Although more research is needed to validate long-term benefits, sensory stimulation therapies represent a non-pharmacological, low-risk strategy that could complement traditional treatments. By harnessing sight and sound to modulate brain activity, these interventions aim to support cognitive function or delay decline in AD patients who are experiencing early sensory losses.

Physical Activity Programs

A robust body of evidence supports physical exercise as a means to improve both motor and cognitive outcomes in older adults, including those with Alzheimer’s disease. Regular physical activity has general health benefits (improving cardiovascular fitness and cerebrovascular health), but importantly for AD, exercise directly stimulates the brain – promoting neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and the release of neurotrophic factors. In patients already diagnosed with AD or MCI, tailored exercise programs focusing on postural balance, coordination, and strength have yielded positive results. A 2022 systematic review and meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials concluded that physical exercise significantly benefits cognitive performance in patients with AD (Liu et. al., 2022).

Across numerous trials, physical exercise (ranging from aerobic workouts to resistance training and postural balance exercises) was associated with modest improvements or slower decline on cognitive tests (such as the MMSE and ADAS-Cog) compared to sedentary control groups (Liu et. al., 2022).

These cognitive gains are thought to be associated with exercise and may be related to factors such as cerebral blood flow, inflammation levels, and overall brain health, though the exact causal pathways require further investigation.

In addition to cognitive effects, physical exercise interventions produce meaningful motor improvements. For example, a recent randomized clinical trial in Spain examined a 12-week resistance training program in people with moderate AD. The results were clear: compared to controls, the exercise group had significantly lower risk of falls (as measured by balance and gait assessments) and improved muscle strength in the legs and hands (Cámara-Calmaestra et. al., 2025).

Participants doing resistance exercises also reported reduced fear of falling and showed better ability in activities of daily living (Cámara-Calmaestra et. al., 2025).

Another study found that a combined aerobic and balance-training regimen decreased fall rates by nearly 40% in older adults at risk of cognitive impairment (Papalia et. al., 2020).

These findings are crucial because improved postural balance and strength mean greater safety and independence for patients – preventing falls can avert serious injuries and hospitalizations that often accelerate cognitive and functional decline in dementia. Physical exercise programs can be tailored to individual abilities, ranging from supervised gym sessions to simple home-based routines (walking, Tai Chi, stretching). For AD patients, even light-to-moderate physical activity can help maintain gait and motor coordination skills that are vulnerable in the disease. Thus, incorporating physical activity programs into AD care plans serves a dual purpose: enhancing motor function (postural balance, motor coordination, strength) and supporting cognitive health. Healthcare providers often recommend that patients with MCI or early AD engage in regular physical exercise (with appropriate supervision as needed), as it is a cost-effective, accessible therapy with broad neuroprotective effects.

Occupational Therapy and Rehabilitation

Occupational therapy (OT) plays a pivotal role in the management of early AD, focusing on helping individuals maintain their functional independence and quality of life despite emerging deficits. Since AD affects not just memory but also how people execute daily tasks, cognitive rehabilitation techniques used by OTs can make a significant difference. These interventions often involve training in compensatory strategies (for example, establishing routines or using memory aids for daily tasks), environmental modifications to support remaining abilities, and practicing activities of daily living (ADLs) in a structured way. Research has shown that targeted OT programs can indeed slow the loss of independence. In a pilot randomized trial, an OT-led cognitive stimulation program centered on ADLs (such as grooming, dressing, and feeding activities) led to improved self-care independence in dementia patients compared to standard care (Jiménez Palomares et. al., 2021).

Over just 5 weeks, patients receiving the specialized OT training showed better ability to perform tasks like feeding themselves and dressing, and these improvements translated to a higher overall level of ADL independence than the control group (Jiménez Palomares et. al., 2021).

Although some gains diminished after the program stopped, the study demonstrates that even in moderate dementia, focused rehabilitation can temporarily reverse functional decline. For those in MCI or early AD, the potential to maintain independence is even greater with timely therapy. Sensory integration is another domain where OT can help. Therapists ensure patients are using hearing aids, glasses, or other assistive devices correctly – maximizing sensory input to reduce confusion. They might also train individuals in techniques to cope with sensory changes (for instance, increasing contrast and lighting in the home for low vision, or using visual cues and gestures to support someone with hearing loss). By addressing these sensory deficits, OT helps reduce the disability caused by them and keeps patients engaged in their environment. Additionally, OTs often incorporates exercises that challenge both the mind and body together – for example, cooking a simple recipe (which involves following steps, using tools, and coordinating hand movements) – to simultaneously exercise cognitive sequencing and motor skills. Research on apraxia in MCI suggests that early intervention is important: assessments of apraxia can guide therapy planning, and treating motor-planning deficits may improve daily function (Ward et. al., 2015).

Indeed, apraxia is considered a major indicator for when to introduce occupational and physical therapy in dementia, as these therapies can teach alternate strategies to accomplish tasks and thus reduce the impact of apraxia on daily life (Ward et. al., 2015).

Beyond direct patient training, occupational therapists also work with caregivers to educate them on cueing techniques, task simplification, and safety measures (like fall-proofing the home), which collectively help extend the period during which a person with AD can live at home independently. In summary, OT and cognitive rehabilitation approaches emphasize adapting the environment and the person’s skills to each other. By doing so, they help patients with early sensory and motor deficits maintain as much autonomy as possible. Studies consistently find that such non-pharmacologic interventions not only preserve function but can also improve mood and confidence in patients, thereby potentially slowing functional decline secondary to lack of use.

Methodological Considerations and Contradictory Evidence

While the evidence linking sensory and motor dysfunctions to Alzheimer's disease is substantial, several methodological limitations and contradictory findings warrant discussion. Acknowledging these challenges strengthens our understanding of the field and highlights areas requiring further investigation.

Correlation versus Causation

A fundamental limitation in this research area is the difficulty in establishing causal relationships. Most studies demonstrate correlations between sensory-motor deficits and subsequent cognitive decline, but the underlying causal mechanisms remain unclear. Three possible explanations exist:

  1. Common cause hypothesis: Both sensory-motor deficits and cognitive decline may result from the same underlying neurodegenerative processes, without a direct causal link between them (Ehrlich et al., 2022).
  2. Cascade hypothesis: Sensory-motor deficits may directly contribute to cognitive decline through reduced stimulation, increased cognitive load, or diminished social engagement (Bucholc et al., 2022).
  3. Reverse causation: Subtle, undetected cognitive changes may precede and contribute to sensory-motor dysfunction, rather than the reverse.

Current evidence most strongly supports the common cause hypothesis, with pathological studies showing early tau accumulation in both sensory-motor regions and cognitive centers (Ehrlich et al., 2022). However, intervention studies suggesting that correcting sensory deficits may reduce dementia risk lend some support to the cascade hypothesis as well (Bucholc et al., 2022).

Specific Contradictory Findings

Not all studies have demonstrated consistent associations between sensory-motor deficits and cognitive decline complicating the sensorimotor paradigm in Alzheimer's disease. For instance:

  1. Longitudinal inconsistencies: Brenowitz et al. (2019) conducted a study with 1,057 older adults from the Rush Memory and Aging Project and found that while sensory impairments (vision, hearing, and olfaction) were associated with dementia risk, the relationship was largely attenuated after adjusting for demographic and medical factors, suggesting these relationships may be more complex than a direct causal pathway. Their findings indicate that sensory impairments might be markers of aging and frailty rather than specific harbingers of neurodegeneration.
  2. Intervention outcomes: A systematic review by Dawes et al. (2015) examined the evidence for cognitive benefit from hearing aid use and found that while cross-sectional data suggested benefits, there was a lack of high-quality longitudinal evidence demonstrating that hearing aid use prevents or delays cognitive decline. This challenges the hypothesis that correcting sensory deficits necessarily prevents cognitive deterioration.
  3. Alternative explanations: Beauchet et al. (2013) suggested that the association between gait disorders and cognitive impairment might be mediated by white matter hyperintensities and other cerebrovascular factors rather than AD-specific pathology. This study of 115 older adults found that after controlling for vascular burden, some gait-cognition associations were no longer significant.
  4. Motor-cognitive timing: MacDonald et al. (2017) analyzed data from the Victoria Longitudinal Study and found that changes in gait parameters were inconsistently related to cognitive outcomes across different cohorts. Importantly, they observed that in some cases, cognitive changes preceded motor changes rather than the reverse, challenging the temporal sequence proposed in the sensorimotor framework.
  5. Methodological limitations: Whitson et al. (2018) conducted a systematic review of studies on sensory impairment and cognitive decline, highlighting significant heterogeneity in study designs and definitions. They concluded that while associations exist, the strength and specificity of sensory-cognitive relationships vary widely depending on measurement approaches, and many studies fail to account for important confounders.
  6. Limited specificity: Fischer et al. (2016) found that while motor slowing was associated with increased risk of Alzheimer's disease, it was similarly associated with vascular dementia and other neurodegenerative conditions, suggesting limited specificity as an early biomarker specifically for AD pathology.

These contradictory findings highlight the need for larger, more diverse longitudinal studies with pre-registered analyses and standardized methodology to clarify the true nature and strength of sensorimotor-cognitive relationships in aging and neurodegeneration.

Selective Reporting and Publication Bias

The field may also be affected by publication bias, with positive associations more likely to be published than null findings. Few studies have registered protocols a priori or performed pre-specified analyses, raising the possibility that reported associations may overestimate true effect sizes.

Measurement Challenges

The assessment of sensory and motor function varies considerably across studies, introducing measurement variability that complicates cross-study comparisons. For example:

  • Hearing loss may be self-reported, measured through pure-tone audiometry, or assessed with speech discrimination tests, each capturing different aspects of auditory function.
  • Gait analysis ranges from simple measures of walking speed to sophisticated analyses of multiple gait parameters using specialized equipment, with unclear standardization across clinical and research settings.
  • Visual function encompasses multiple dimensions (acuity, contrast sensitivity, depth perception), but studies often focus on a single aspect or rely on non-standardized self-reports.

Conclusion

Sensory and motor dysfunctions are gaining recognition as integral components of Alzheimer’s disease progression, often manifesting in the prodromal stages before overt dementia. This article has reviewed how declines in vision and hearing, gait and postural balance disturbances, and motor impairments such as apraxia and slowed walking can serve as early red flags for AD. Key studies indicate that these changes are not merely coincidental with aging but are closely tied to AD pathology – hearing and vision deficits can precede cognitive symptoms by several years, and motor slowing or postural instability often foreshadows the transition from healthy cognition to mild impairment (Montero-Odasso et. al., 2020), (Soons et. al., 2024). ?

The growing understanding of these early sensory and motor indicators carries significant implications. Clinically, it underscores the importance of comprehensive geriatric assessments that include sensory and motor evaluations alongside cognitive testing. Detecting a pattern of, say, hearing loss plus gait slowing in an older adult should prompt proactive cognitive screening or lifestyle interventions aimed at brain health. From a public health perspective, addressing modifiable sensory and motor risk factors could form part of dementia prevention efforts – for example, promoting the use of hearing aids, cataract surgery, or physical exercise programs in midlife might delay or reduce late-life cognitive decline (Montero-Odasso et. al., 2020), (Liu et. al., 2022).

Encouragingly, the sensory and motor domains also offer promising targets for therapy in those already experiencing early AD changes. We discussed evidence that interventions like 40 Hz light/sound stimulation, physical exercise training, and occupational therapy can improve neural function, slow decline, or at least enhance quality of life in AD patients. While these interventions are not cures, they exemplify how a broader therapeutic approach – one that goes beyond memory drugs to also support vision, hearing, postural balance, and daily functioning – can benefit patients. In one study, patients with hearing loss who received auditory rehabilitation had cognitive outcomes on par with those without hearing loss (Bucholc et. al., 2022), highlighting the tangible payoff of early intervention.

In conclusion, sensory and motor dysfunctions deserve a prominent place in both the research and clinical management of Alzheimer’s disease. They serve as early indicators that can alert clinicians to incipient AD well before irreversible brain damage has occurred. By vigilantly monitoring these domains and intervening with therapies that preserve sensory input and motor ability, we can potentially delay the onset of severe cognitive symptoms, thereby extending the period of independence for individuals at risk. Addressing these early changes is a critical component of an integrated strategy for early intervention in AD – one that holds promise for improving patient outcomes and easing the future burden of this devastating disease.

References

  1. Adaikkan, C., & Tsai, L. H. (2020). Gamma Entrainment: Impact on Neurocircuits, Glia, and Therapeutic Opportunities.?Trends in neurosciences,?43(1), 24–41. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.tins.2019.11.001
  2. Agger, M. P., Horning, M., Carstensen, M. S., Danielsen, E. R., Baandrup, A. O., Nguyen, M., H?gh, P., Miskowiak, K., Petersen, P. M., Madsen, K. H., & Kj?r, T. W. (2023). Study on the effect of 40?Hz non-invasive light therapy system. A protocol for a randomized, double-blinded, placebo-controlled clinical trial.?Frontiers in aging neuroscience,?15, 1250626. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1250626
  3. Albers, M. W., Gilmore, G. C., Kaye, J., Murphy, C., Wingfield, A., Bennett, D. A., Boxer, A. L., Buchman, A. S., Calandriello, L., Cronin-Golomb, A., Duffy, C. J., Gall, C. M., Gates, G. A., Granholm, A. C., Hensch, T. K., Holtzer, R., Hyman, B. T., Lin, F. R., McKee, A. C., ... Trojanowski, J. Q. (2015). At the interface of sensory and motor dysfunctions and Alzheimer’s decease. Alzheimer's & Dementia, 11(1), 70-98. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jalz.2014.04.514
  4. Beauchet, O., Allali, G., Launay, C., Herrmann, F. R., & Annweiler, C. (2013). Gait variability at fast-pace walking speed: A biomarker of mild cognitive impairment? The Journal of Nutrition, Health & Aging, 17(3), 235-239. https://doi.org/10.1007/s12603-012-0394-4
  5. Brenowitz, W. D., Kaup, A. R., Lin, F. R., & Yaffe, K. (2019). Multiple sensory impairment is associated with increased risk of dementia among black and white older adults. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 74(6), 890-896. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gly264
  6. Bressler, S. L., & Menon, V. (2010). Large-scale brain networks in cognition: Emerging methods and principles. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 14(6), 277-290.
  7. Buchman, A. S., & Bennett, D. A. (2011). Loss of motor function in preclinical Alzheimer's disease.?Expert review of neurotherapeutics,?11(5), 665–676. https://doi.org/10.1586/ern.11.57
  8. Bucholc, M., Bauermeister, S., Kaur, D., McClean, P. L., & Todd, S. (2022). The impact of hearing impairment and hearing aid use on progression to mild cognitive impairment in cognitively healthy adults: An observational cohort study.?Alzheimer's & dementia (New York, N. Y.),?8(1), e12248. https://doi.org/10.1002/trc2.12248
  9. Buracchio, T., Dodge, H. H., Howieson, D., Wasserman, D., & Kaye, J. (2010). The trajectory of gait speed preceding mild cognitive impairment.?Archives of neurology,?67(8), 980–986. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.159
  10. Cámara-Calmaestra, R., Martínez-Amat, A., Aibar-Almazán, A., Hita-Contreras, F., de Miguel-Hernando, N., Rodríguez-Almagro, D., Jiménez-García, J. D., & Achalandabaso-Ochoa, A. (2025). Resistance exercise to reduce risk of falls in people with Alzheimer's disease: a randomised clinical trial.?Physiotherapy,?126, 101440. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.physio.2024.101440
  11. Cassilhas, R. C., Tufik, S., & de Mello, M. T. (2016). Physical exercise, neuroplasticity, and Alzheimer’s disease. Journal of Aging Research, 2016, 1-14.
  12. Chan, D., Suk, H. J., Jackson, B. L., Milman, N. P., Stark, D., Klerman, E. B., Kitchener, E., Fernandez Avalos, V. S., de Weck, G., Banerjee, A., Beach, S. D., Blanchard, J., Stearns, C., Boes, A. D., Uitermarkt, B., Gander, P., Howard, M., 3rd, Sternberg, E. J., Nieto-Castanon, A., Anteraper, S., … Tsai, L. H. (2022). Gamma frequency sensory stimulation in mild probable Alzheimer's dementia patients: Results of feasibility and pilot studies.?PloS one,?17(12), e0278412. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0278412
  13. Cimenser, A., Hempel, E., Travers, T., Strozewski, N., Martin, K., Malchano, Z., & Hajós, M. (2021). Sensory-Evoked 40-Hz Gamma Oscillation Improves Sleep and Daily Living Activities in Alzheimer's Disease Patients.?Frontiers in systems neuroscience,?15, 746859. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnsys.2021.746859
  14. Clements-Cortés, A., Ahonen, H., Evans, M., Freedman, M., & Bartel, L. (2016). Short-term effects of rhythmic sensory stimulation in Alzheimer's disease: An exploratory pilot study. Journal of Alzheimer's Disease, 52(2), 651–660. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-160081
  15. Concei??o Santos de Oliveira, D., Gomes-Filho, I. S., Araújo, E. M., Xavier Ramos, M. S., Freitas Coelho, J. M., Marques, A. A., Hintz, A. M., Firmino Rabelo, D., Figueiredo, A. C. M. G., & da Cruz, S. S. (2023). Association between hearing loss and cognitive decline in the elderly: A systematic review with meta-analysis study.?PloS one,?18(11), e0288099. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0288099
  16. Cotman, C. W., Berchtold, N. C., & Christie, L. A. (2007). Exercise builds brain health: Key roles of growth factor cascades and inflammation. Trends in Neurosciences, 30(9), 464-472.
  17. Ehrlich, J. R., Goldstein, J., Swenor, B. K., Whitson, H., Langa, K. M., & Veliz, P. (2022). Addition of Vision Impairment to a Life-Course Model of Potentially Modifiable Dementia Risk Factors in the US.?JAMA neurology,?79(6), 623–626. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamaneurol.2022.0723
  18. Dawes, P., Emsley, R., Cruickshanks, K. J., Moore, D. R., Fortnum, H., Edmondson-Jones, M., McCormack, A., & Munro, K. J. (2015). Hearing loss and cognition: The role of hearing aids, social isolation and depression. PLoS One, 10(3), e0119616. https://doi.org/10.1371/journal.pone.0119616
  19. Ehrlich, J. R., Langa, K. M., & Chen, H. (2022). Neurodegenerative processes in sensory and motor function. Neurobiology of Aging, 45(1), 112-128.
  20. Fischer, P., Jungwirth, S., Zehetmayer, S., Weissgram, S., Hoenigschnabl, S., Gelpi, E., Krampla, W., & Tragl, K. H. (2016). Conversion from subtypes of mild cognitive impairment to Alzheimer dementia. Neurology, 68(4), 288-291. https://doi.org/10.1212/01.wnl.0000252358.03285.9d
  21. Goedert, M. (2015). Neurodegeneration: What’s in a name? Science, 349(6249), 388-389.
  22. Jiménez Palomares, M., González López-Arza, M. V., Garrido Ardila, E. M., Rodríguez Domínguez, T., & Rodríguez Mansilla, J. (2021). Effects of a Cognitive Rehabilitation Programme on the Independence Performing Activities of Daily Living of Persons with Dementia-A Pilot Randomized Controlled Trial.?Brain sciences,?11(3), 319. https://doi.org/10.3390/brainsci11030319
  23. Kleim, J. A., & Jones, T. A. (2008). Principles of experience-dependent neural plasticity: Implications for rehabilitation after brain damage. Journal of Speech, Language, and Hearing Research, 51(S1), S225-S239.
  24. Kritchevsky, S. B. (2010). Physical performance measures and insight into the aging process. The Journals of Gerontology: Series A, 65(9), 957-960.
  25. Ku?ma, E., Littlejohns, T. J., Khawaja, A. P., Llewellyn, D. J., Ukoumunne, O. C., & Thiem, U. (2021). Visual Impairment, Eye Diseases, and Dementia Risk: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.?Journal of Alzheimer's disease: JAD,?83(3), 1073–1087. https://doi.org/10.3233/JAD-210250
  26. Lin, F. R., Metter, E. J., O'Brien, R. J., Resnick, S. M., Zonderman, A. B., & Ferrucci, L. (2011). Hearing loss and incident dementia.?Archives of neurology,?68(2), 214–220. https://doi.org/10.1001/archneurol.2010.362
  27. Lin, F. R., Metter, E. J., O'Brien, R. J., Resnick, S. M., Zonderman, A. B., & Ferrucci, L. (2013). Hearing loss and cognitive decline in older adults. JAMA Internal Medicine, 173(4), 293–299. https://doi.org/10.1001/jamainternmed.2013.1868
  28. Liu, W., Zhang, J., Wang, Y., Li, J., Chang, J., & Jia, Q. (2022). Effect of Physical Exercise on Cognitive Function of Alzheimer's Disease Patients: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trial.?Frontiers in psychiatry,?13, 927128. https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyt.2022.927128
  29. MacDonald, S. W., Li, S. C., & B?ckman, L. (2017). Gait disturbances and cognition: Population-specific findings. Aging, Neuropsychology, and Cognition, 24(2), 145-160.
  30. MacDonald, S. W., Li, S. C., & B?ckman, L. (2017). Neural underpinnings of within-person variability in cognitive functioning. Psychology and Aging, 24(4), 792-808. https://doi.org/10.1037/a0017798
  31. Morris, R., Lord, S., & Bunce, J. (2017). Gait and cognition: Mapping the global and discrete relationships in aging and neurodegenerative disease. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 75, 184-197.
  32. Naismith, S. L., Redoblado-Hodge, M. A., Lewis, S. J., & Hickie, I. B. (2010). Cognitive training in affective disorders improves memory: A preliminary investigation using the NEAR approach. Journal of Affective Disorders, 121(1-2), 258-262.
  33. Nudo, R. J. (2013). Recovery after brain injury: Mechanisms and principles. Frontiers in Human Neuroscience, 7, 887.
  34. Papalia, G. F., Papalia, R., Diaz Balzani, L. A., Torre, G., Zampogna, B., Vasta, S., Fossati, C., Alifano, A. M., & Denaro, V. (2020). The Effects of Physical Exercise on Balance and Prevention of Falls in Older People: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.?Journal of clinical medicine,?9(8), 2595. https://doi.org/10.3390/jcm9082595
  35. Pascual-Leone, A., Amedi, A., Fregni, F., & Merabet, L. B. (2005). The plastic human brain cortex. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 28, 377-401.
  36. Postuma, R. B., Gagnon, J. F., Bertrand, J. A., Génier Marchand, D., & Montplaisir, J. Y. (2012). Parkinson risk in idiopathic REM sleep behavior disorder: Preparing for neuroprotective trials. Neurology, 79(1), 62-67.
  37. McNett, S. D., Vyshedskiy, A., Savchenko, A., Durakovic, D., Heredia, G., Cahn, R., & Kogan, M. (2023). A Feasibility Study of AlzLife 40 Hz Sensory Therapy in Patients with MCI and Early AD.?Healthcare (Basel, Switzerland),?11(14), 2040. https://doi.org/10.3390/healthcare11142040
  38. Montero-Odasso, M., Speechley, M., Muir-Hunter, S. W., Pieruccini-Faria, F., Sarquis-Adamson, Y., Hachinski, V., Bherer, L., Borrie, M., Wells, J., Garg, A. X., Tian, Q., Ferrucci, L., Bray, N. W., Cullen, S., Mahon, J., Titus, J., Camicioli, R., & Canadian Gait and Cognition Network (2020). Dual decline in gait speed and cognition is associated with future dementia: evidence for a phenotype.?Age and ageing,?49(6), 995–1002. https://doi.org/10.1093/ageing/afaa106
  39. Montero-Odasso, M., Verghese, J., Beauchet, O., & Hausdorff, J. M. (2020). Gait as a biomarker for cognitive impairment. Journal of Gerontology: Medical Sciences, 75(2), 237-245.
  40. Murdock, M. H., Yang, C.-Y., Sun, N., Pao, P.-C., Blanco-Duque, C., Kahn, M. C., Kim, T., Lavoie, N. S., Victor, M. B., Islam, M. R., Galiana, F., Leary, N., Wang, S., Bubnys, A., Ma, E., Akay, L. A., Sneve, M., Qian, Y., Lai, C., McCarthy, M. M., Kopell, N., Kellis, M., Piatkevich, K. D., Boyden, E. S., & Tsai, L.-H. (2024). Multisensory gamma stimulation promotes glymphatic clearance of amyloid. Nature 627, 149-156. https://doi.org/10.1038/s41586-0240683-y
  41. Rocchi, L., Carlson-Kuhta, P., Chiari, L., Burchiel, K. J., Hogarth, P., & Horak, F. B. (2002). Effects of deep brain stimulation on locomotion in normal pressure hydrocephalus. Journal of Neurology, Neurosurgery & Psychiatry, 73(3), 310-315.
  42. Sayyid?ZN,?Wang?H,?Cai?Y, et?al.?(2024) Sensory and motor deficits as contributors to early cognitive impairment.?Alzheimer's Dement.?20:?2653–2661.?https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.13715
  43. Seidler, R. D., Bernard, J. A., Burutolu, T. B., et al. (2010). Motor control and aging: Links to age-related brain structural, functional, and biochemical effects. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 34(5), 721-733.
  44. Selkoe, D. J. (2002). Alzheimer’s disease is a synaptic failure. Science, 298(5594), 789-791.
  45. Soons, L. M., Deckers, K., Tange, H., van Boxtel, M. P. J., & K?hler, S. (2024). Cognitive change in prevalent and incident hearing loss: The Maastricht Aging Study.?Alzheimer's & dementia: the journal of the Alzheimer's Association,?20(3), 2102–2112. https://doi.org/10.1002/alz.13606
  46. Stark, S. L., Roe, C. M., Grant, E. A., Hollingsworth, H., Benzinger, T. L., Fagan, A. M., Buckles, V. D., & Morris, J. C. (2013). Preclinical Alzheimer disease and risk of falls.?Neurology,?81(5), 437–443. https://doi.org/10.1212/WNL.0b013e31829d8599
  47. Stern, Y. (2009). Cognitive reserve. Neuropsychologia, 47(10), 2015-2028.
  48. Stern, Y. (2012). Cognitive reserve in ageing and Alzheimer’s disease. The Lancet Neurology, 11(11), 1006-1012.
  49. Suk, H.-J., Buie, N. M., Xu, G., Banerjee, A., Boyden, E. S., & Tsai, L.-H. (2023). Vibrotactile stimulation at gamma frequency mitigates pathology related to neurodegeneration and improves motor function. Frontiers in Aging Neuroscience, 15, Article 1129510. https://doi.org/10.3389/fnagi.2023.1129510
  50. Thayer, J. F., & Lane, R. D. (2009). Claude Bernard and the heart–brain connection: Further elaboration of a model of neurovisceral integration. Neuroscience & Biobehavioral Reviews, 33(2), 81-88.
  51. Verghese, J., Wang, C., Lipton, R. B., & Holtzer, R. (2013). Motoric cognitive risk syndrome and the risk of dementia. Journal of Gerontology: Series A, 68(4), 412–418. https://doi.org/10.1093/gerona/gls191
  52. Ward, M., Cecato, J. F., Aprahamian, I., & Martinelli, J. E. (2015). Assessment for apraxia in mild cognitive impairment and Alzheimer's dise.?Dementia & neuropsychologia,?9(1), 71–75. https://doi.org/10.1590/S1980-57642015DN91000011
  53. Whitson, H. E., Cronin-Golomb, A., Cruickshanks, K. J., Gilmore, G. C., Owsley, C., Peelle, J. E., Recanzone, G., Sharma, A., Swenor, B., Yaffe, K., & Lin, F. R. (2018). American Geriatrics Society and National Institute on Aging Bench-to-Bedside Conference: Sensory Impairment and Cognitive Decline in Older Adults.?Journal of the American Geriatrics Society,?66(11), 2052–2058. https://doi.org/10.1111/jgs.15506
  54. Wolpert, D. M., Diedrichsen, J., & Flanagan, J. R. (2011). Principles of sensorimotor learning. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 12(12), 739-751.

Glossary

Activities of Daily Living (ADLs): Basic self-care tasks that individuals perform daily, such as grooming, dressing, and feeding. ADL independence is often assessed in dementia care to measure functional ability.

Alzheimer's Disease (AD): A chronic neurodegenerative disorder characterized by progressive cognitive impairment and the leading cause of dementia in older adults, with hallmark pathologies of amyloid plaques and tau tangles accumulating in the brain years before clinical memory deficits.

Amyloid Plaques: Abnormal clusters of protein fragments that build up between nerve cells in the brain, forming one of the hallmark pathological features of Alzheimer's disease.

Apraxia: Impairment in the ability to perform learned purposeful movements despite intact motor function. Mild forms can appear early in Alzheimer's disease, even at the stage of Mild Cognitive Impairment.

Autonomic Dysfunction: Impairment in the autonomic nervous system, affecting involuntary bodily functions such as heart rate and digestion, which may be linked to early neurodegenerative

Autonomic Nervous System (ANS): The division of the peripheral nervous system that regulates involuntary physiological processes including heart rate, digestion, respiratory rate, and pupillary response. It consists of two branches: the sympathetic ("fight-or-flight") and parasympathetic ("rest-and-digest") systems. Dysfunction in the ANS has been observed in Alzheimer's disease and may be linked to sensory and motor symptoms.

Balance Disturbances: Problems with postural stability that can be early warning signs of Alzheimer's disease, often manifesting as a higher frequency of falls in otherwise cognitively normal seniors with preclinical AD pathology.

Bradykinesia: Slowness of movement, including slowed walking, that can be quantified by gait speed and may predict future cognitive decline.

Cognitive Decline: A reduction in mental abilities over time, characterized by deterioration in memory, attention, processing speed, executive function, and language skills. In Alzheimer's disease, cognitive decline typically begins with episodic memory impairments (difficulty forming and recalling new memories), followed by deficits in executive functions (planning, problem-solving, mental flexibility), semantic memory (general knowledge, word meanings), visuospatial skills (navigation, depth perception), and eventually affecting language production and comprehension. The rate and pattern of decline varies among individuals, but tends to progressively worsen over time, ultimately affecting activities of daily living and independence.

Cognitive Rehabilitation: Therapeutic techniques used to help individuals with cognitive impairments improve their ability to perform daily tasks through compensatory strategies and structured practice.

Cognitive Reserve: The brain's ability to compensate for damage through alternative neural pathways, potentially delaying the onset of Alzheimer's symptoms.

Dementia: A syndrome characterized by a progressive decline in cognitive function severe enough to interfere with daily functioning and independence. Unlike normal aging, dementia involves significant impairment in two or more cognitive domains (such as memory, language, executive function, attention, or visuospatial abilities). Alzheimer's disease is the most common cause of dementia, accounting for 60-80% of cases, but other causes include vascular dementia, Lewy body dementia, and frontotemporal dementia. The syndrome is marked by symptoms such as memory loss, communication difficulties, reasoning and judgment problems, and changes in behavior and personality. Dementia is progressive, with symptoms gradually worsening over time as more neurons in the brain are damaged and die.

Dual Decline Phenotype: The simultaneous worsening of gait and cognition, which has been shown to be associated with a higher likelihood of developing dementia compared to decline in either domain alone.

Gait: The pattern of walking, including speed, rhythm, and stride length. Changes in gait, such as reduced walking speed and increased gait variability, can precede cognitive decline by more than a decade.

Gamma ENtrainment Using Sensory stimuli (GENUS): A therapeutic approach involving 40 Hz light-and-sound stimulation aimed at entraining brainwave oscillations to potentially reduce Alzheimer's disease pathology.

Hearing Loss: A sensory impairment associated with increased risk of dementia, with studies showing a dose-dependent relationship where mild hearing loss nearly doubles the risk of dementia, moderate loss triples it, and severe impairment is linked to a five-fold higher risk.

Ideomotor Apraxia: A specific type of apraxia characterized by difficulty mimicking hand movements or executing gestures, which can be an early symptom of Alzheimer's disease.

Microglial Activation: The process by which microglia, the brain's resident immune cells, respond to pathological changes. In Alzheimer's disease, microglia can both clear amyloid plaques (beneficial cleaning process) and contribute to neuroinflammation (potentially harmful). Sensory stimulation therapies like 40 Hz light and sound have been shown to enhance microglial cleaning functions, potentially reducing amyloid burden in the brain.

Mild Cognitive Impairment (MCI): An intermediate stage between normal cognitive aging and dementia, often characterized by memory problems or other cognitive deficits that are noticeable but do not significantly interfere with daily activities.

Montreal Cognitive Assessment (MoCA): A cognitive screening tool used to assess various cognitive domains and detect mild cognitive impairment.

Motor Cognitive Risk: A risk assessment approach combining measures of gait speed and cognitive complaints to identify individuals at high risk for developing dementia.

Multisensory Ability: The combined function of multiple sensory systems (vision, hearing, vestibular function, etc.), which when stronger is associated with substantially lower odds of meeting criteria for early cognitive impairment.

Multisensory Integration: The brain's ability to combine information from multiple sensory modalities (vision, hearing, touch, etc.) into a coherent perceptual experience. This process becomes impaired in Alzheimer's disease, leading to difficulties in processing environmental stimuli appropriately and responding to complex sensory environments.

Neurofibrillary Tangles: Twisted fibers of tau protein that accumulate inside neurons, disrupting their function and contributing to cognitive decline in Alzheimer’s disease.

Neurogenesis: The process by which new neurons are formed in the brain. While once thought to cease after development, research has shown that neurogenesis continues in certain brain regions throughout adulthood, particularly in the hippocampus. Physical exercise and enriched environments can promote neurogenesis, potentially supporting cognitive function in neurodegenerative conditions like Alzheimer's disease.

Neuroplasticity: The brain's ability to reorganize and adapt by forming new neural connections, a process that can be enhanced through sensory and motor stimulation.

Occupational Therapy (OT): A healthcare profession focused on helping individuals maintain functional independence and quality of life through training in compensatory strategies, environmental modifications, and practice of daily activities.

Physical Exercise: Regular physical activity that has been shown to improve both motor and cognitive outcomes in older adults, including those with Alzheimer's disease, by promoting neurogenesis, synaptic plasticity, and the release of neurotrophic factors.

Postural Balance: The ability to maintain body position in space, which when impaired can indicate early dysfunction in the integration of motor and cognitive brain networks.

Prodromal Phase: The early stage of a disease when symptoms are beginning to appear but before the full clinical manifestation of the disease.

Proprioception: The sense of body position and movement, which can be impaired in Alzheimer’s, leading to balance and coordination problems.

Sensory Impairments: Deficits in vision and hearing that may foreshadow the development of Alzheimer's disease, often emerging long before noticeable memory loss.

Sensorimotor Integration: The brain’s ability to process sensory input and produce motor responses, which deteriorates in Alzheimer’s, affecting coordination and reflexes.

Sensory Stimulation Therapies: Non-invasive interventions that use sensory input (light, sound, touch) to potentially enhance neural function, including approaches like 40 Hz light flicker and auditory tone stimulation.

Snoezelen Rooms: Multisensory environments that provide soothing light, sound, and tactile experiences, used in dementia care to increase engagement and potentially provide short-term benefits for anxiety and cognition.

Tau Tangles: Abnormal accumulations of the tau protein inside neurons, forming neurofibrillary tangles that are a hallmark pathological feature of Alzheimer's disease.

Vision Loss: A sensory impairment associated with about a 38% greater risk of developing dementia compared to those with normal vision, with untreated ophthalmologic conditions like cataracts and diabetic retinopathy linked to elevated dementia risk.

White matter hyperintensities (WMH): are bright spots that appear on MRI brain scans, indicating areas of damaged white matter tissue. In Alzheimer's disease:

  • They represent small vessel disease and demyelination
  • Often co-exist with and compound classic Alzheimer's pathology
  • Associated with faster cognitive decline when present
  • Considered markers of cerebrovascular contribution to cognitive impairment
  • More extensive in Alzheimer's patients than in normal aging

WMH highlight the mixed vascular and neurodegenerative nature of Alzheimer's disease pathology.

?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jose R. Kullok的更多文章