“Sell High”!

“Sell High”!

(Apologies for my blog hiatus. I left off on 7/6/21 with the third – of an intended 6 – blogs on rethinking management beliefs for the better. This is fourth in the series. For the first three, check?blogs 250?to 252)

INITIAL, SELL-HIGH THOUGHTS

Here’s a fantasy: raise all prices by 1% and not upset or lose any customer business. Then: with zero increase in service-activity costs, the incremental margin (less rep commissions) flows to the bottom line. This is the easiest, fastest and biggest profit-improving tactic for distributors: in theory only!

Sell High (for no increase in service value or without patented, exclusive products) is – a you-win, customers-lose, zero-sum – proposition. It has never succeeded in competitive, free-market history. If perchance you have underpriced, best service-value, then do assert your untapped “pricing-power”.

And, do be pricing efficient. Do you have non-shopped (low-dollar) SKUs for which prices could be tweaked higher – unnoticed? Ignore historical “list pricing” and charge what the market will bear. (SPARXiQ.com?can help!).

Don’t make fallacious Gross-Margin-Percentage (GM%) assumptions. Both “Sell High” and “Buy Low” simulations expand general GM%. So, it’s natural to assume that all customers and SKUs that have high, average GM%s are profitable? They aren’t! Average, GM-dollars/order and SKU-pick (less) related activity-cost dollars (equals) profits or losses.

Financial statements are blind to the average GM$s/order for each customer. A 50% GM on a $2 pick or order will be a cost-to-serve loser. A 10% GM on a $100K drop-ship will be very net-profitable. (Get best customer profitability analytics from?WaypointAnalytics.net?to fix losing customers and SKUs while growing the winners.)

NEXT-LEVEL THOUGHTS??

How can your reps get: “last-look + two extra points”? Easy: have guaranteed, best, service-value and reps who improve customers’ profits. But, if you are amongst the 95% of distributors who don’t have either, then be happy with last-look, price-taking and herd profitability.

To be top 5%? Target one customer niche at a time. Define, measure and achieve distinctive service metrics for the niche. Teach reps to teach customers how your service lowers their “total procurement cost” (TPC) and improves at-hand, uptime productivity. Then, win! (Google: “total procurement cost” + merrifield)

Customers will begrudge you a higher price, but still want the low price. Oblige them with one of two, selling, judo moves. The easy move is: “quid pro quo”. You match the price in exchange for a customer concession: an increase in average GM$/invoice and/or getting more spend.

The complex move – for smart buyers – is to suggest that they partner your best service with a – co-created, integrated, automated replenishment process – for a win-win. Your cost-to-serve as a percent of sales drops to afford lower prices and their TPC drops too.?For more see my?webinar #9?at?merrifieldact2.com?under the “ecommerce 2023” tab.

Conclusions

Don’t “sell high”, sell better in multiple ways. And, do check out the enabling, customer-profitability analytics from?WaypointAnalytics.net.

Gary Karp

Foodservice Industry "Go To Market" Strategic Consultant

3 年

Well said

Susan Merlo

I transform Distributors’ digital capabilities to elevate and showcase their value and enhance their sales strategy using powerful sales funnels that mirror the impact of face-to-face sales.

3 年

Just found this blog in my inbox this morning and had to come on LinkedIn and share this excerpt one more time for the folks in the back:

  • 该图片无替代文字

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了