Self-Defense for Small Women
Ulf Meierkord
“Freelance B2B Acquisition Specialist | Opening Doors for Service Companies, SMEs, and High-Tech Firms | Over 30 Years of Experience in Ethical Client Networking” "Sidehustle: coaching in martial arts and self-defense"
Introduction
A follower of mine suggested I write something about self-defense training for women.
This first sentence feels totally odd! Me? Followers?
Anyway.
In this article, I would like to address what women, especially small women, should, in my considered opinion, take into consideration if they are interested in learning self-defense. I realize this might smack of mansplaining. I can't help being a man and wouldn't if I could. I do have knowledge and experience in such matters, though. Why not share that?
Case in point: There is one guy in the same kickboxing class as me who makes me feel like a little girl. He is about 2m tall, weighs about 120 kg (or more) and has good technique. I cannot take more than two of his kicks even holding a kick shield. If one of those kicks hit me without the benefit of protection, it would send my mortal remains into orbit. And he isn't even trying.
You don't need to be female to be smaller and weaker.
Objective of Self-Defense
If you have to defend yourself, you want to incapacitate the assailant as quickly as possible so you can run away and to safety. There are basically four ways to achieve this:
The Problem
In average, women are smaller than men and a smaller percentage of their body mass is muscles. This means that in a one-on-one fight against a man, a woman will usually find it more difficult to incapacitate a man than vice versa . She will be at a disadvantage in the following ways:
Maybe, there are a few physical advantages for women. They have a higher pain threshold. Otherwise, pregnancy and childbirth would be even worse for them. There is some value in that but will not prevent real damage incapacitating the woman. My firearms instructor told me that woman have, in average, better hand-eye-coordination. I am not sure that this is true. Furthermore, I don't see how it can do a woman any good in a confrontation with a man unless the woman is a sniper in the Ukrainian army.
If any of my readers is, I wish you good hunting!
All this is exacerbated if the woman is small even for her sex. If she is only about 150 cm tall and weighs less than 50 kg, most men will weigh twice as much as she does and will tower over her by a head or two. This is why this article focuses on self-defense for small woman. What works for them will work for the bigger ones even better.
Strategy
The bigger the problem (and it is a biggie), the more you need a plan. And it had better be a good one. The general outline of that plan, your strategy, should be as follows:
Move not to get hit and strike to do incapacitating damage.
You are too weak and fragile to take much punishment. Avoid the assailant's strikes. And only attack vulnerable parts of their body with the intent to injure or destroy. This may seem brutal - because it is. Yet, it is not more brutal than some thug beating up, raping or even killing somebody half his size. Your chances will not be great under the best of circumstances. Do what must be done.
Tactics
Tactics are the various methods you have of implementing your strategy. Strategy tells you why to do something. Tactics tell you what to do when.
Techniques
Techniques are the physical moves you use in order to actually cause damage to the assailant or to avoid damage to yourself. The fewer techniques are part of your personal system, the more you can train each and the more quickly you can choose the right one in an emergency.
The techniques listed below are essential in my considered opinion. They cover most eventualities and are very effective and easy to learn.
Weapons
Horror! Shock! Fright!
Weapons.
I am actually going to say something about hard, sharp, pointy implements used in combat. And worse, I will not try dissuade people of carrying something for self-protection.
And no! I am not referring to fire arms. I am very, very happy about the strict gun laws in my country. If everybody could pack in public, every nutcase, criminal and terrorist could do so. Imagine the situation if the assailants in the recent attacks had had access to AK 47's or AR 15's? Not a pretty thought.
What I am referring to is carrying something legal (and reasonable). Let me give you an example:
A lady friend of mine likes to go hiking. Alone. She has a black belt in karate. However, this alone will be of limited use in a pinch because she is - drum roll - a small woman.
Yes, martial arts have limits. Imagine that.
If she ever runs into a hostile in a remote area, punching him in the face and running will not necessarily save her because there will be nothing and nobody to run to. She will have to face and actually defeat her assailant. True nightmare fodder.
For this reason, she carries an outdoor knife when hiking. On her belt. Visibly. Martial arts are good. Martial arts and a blade are better.
And yes. What she does is legal. Trust me. I am a lawyer.
Weapons are equalizers. They can compensate for differences in size and strength. Even if both parties are armed, these differences are still less important than in an unarmed altercation. Therefore, I am a great advocate of especially women carrying something useful just in case.
What precisely can be carried will depend on various questions:
The answers will determine whether you carry chemical mace, a knife, a walking cane or something else. Knives require little to no training to be very dangerous but are often illegal to carry even in Germany. The same goes for chemical mace.
The safest thing from a legal point of view is knowing how to make combative use of everyday objects that you are allowed to carry no matter when and where like walking canes, flash lights etc.. That does require some training, though.
Disclaimer: Be aware and observe the law of the land where you live! This article does obviously not constitute legal advice!
In closing, I would like to debunk something often said by officials trying to dissuade people from arming themselves: "Don't use a weapon lest it be taken away from you."
What a truckload of BS!!! Knife disarms, for example, are almost impossible to pull off against a determined (not necessarily skilled) attack. The same goes for striking implements or chemical mace. Don't believe this nonsense.
Some Perspective
I would like to add a few remarks that do not fall under the heading of self-defense but are nonetheless very important.
First of all: Germany is a very safe country!!
Let me repeat: Germany is a very safe country!!
Recent murders committed by migrants are horrific. More importantly, they have attracted a lot of attention. They have created or contributed to a feeling of unease, if not fear, among many people. As a matter of course, fascists are exacerbating and exploiting these sentiments for obvious reasons. And many mainstream politicians (looking at you, Mr. Merz) are dumb enough to follow suit.
However, the likelihood of getting murdered in Germany is still extremely low. The murder rate in the USA is higher by a factor of five or so. A few cases, no matter how atrocious, do not change this. If people FEEL safe or not does not have any bearing on whether they ARE safe or not.
Reality does not care about people's feelings. Imagine that.
Therefore, I do not consider it an absolute necessity for the majority of people to train in self-defense. Most people go through all of their adult lives without suffering any assault. I train because I enjoy it and to stay fit. I like feeling able to defend myself if I must but I am not overly concerned about somebody attacking me. Furthermore, self-defense is just one aspect of self-protection, which is a much wider topic.
Returning the the group of women, especially small women, they are most likely to be assaulted - not by a stranger - but by their partners. The most important thing a woman can do to protect herself from physical or sexual assault is being very cautious about whom she enters into or stays in a relationship with.
It is my understanding that women usually are.
Good.
There are many more aspects to self-protection. How do you secure your home? How aware are you of your surroundings and the potentials threats in public? How fast can you run if need be? Can you talk your way out of trouble? Volumes have been written about this topic and this article is already pretty long.
Conclusions
So what are (small) women to do if they want to train in self-defense?
As regards the question of how to go about it, I would like to refer you to my article "How Not to Be a Superhero". It will give you a rough guideline.
Beyond that, you must keep one thing in mind: Anybody who is at a physical disadvantage against an assailant only has a prayer of surviving (not necessarily winning) if they compensate by good technique and aggression, i.e. sheer, unrelenting brutality. Both must be trained.