Seismic Dispersion

For more information on this topic I would recommend visiting: https://www.apexspectral.com/

1. Seismic Dispersion and Time Domain Stretch

Seismic dispersion refers to the variation in seismic wave velocities as they propagate through different geological layers, influenced by factors such as wave frequency and the physical properties of the subsurface materials. This phenomenon is particularly valuable in geophysics as it provides insights into the composition and characteristics of the subsurface, especially in identifying hydrocarbon-bearing zones. Hydrocarbon reservoirs, especially those containing gas, often show distinct dispersion patterns compared to water-saturated or solid rock layers, enabling geophysicists to more accurately distinguish between different geological formations. This makes seismic dispersion an important tool for enhancing the precision of subsurface mapping and resource detection.

Time domain stretch, on the other hand, is a technique used to correct distortions in seismic data caused by variations in seismic wave velocities across subsurface layers. As seismic waves travel through these layers, their arrival times may stretch or compress due to changes in velocity, leading to errors in estimating the depth and thickness of geological features. By applying time domain stretch, these discrepancies are adjusted, resulting in clearer and more accurate seismic images. This technique not only corrects timing errors but also improves the resolution of seismic reflections, making it easier to identify closely spaced events and features. When used alongside seismic dispersion analysis, time domain stretch greatly enhances the ability to detect and characterize hydrocarbons, thereby improving the overall effectiveness of exploration and resource management efforts.

2. Wavelet Thickness and Tuning Effect

The wavelet thickness refers to the relationship between the seismic wavelet's wavelength and the thickness of the subsurface layers. When the thickness of a layer is similar to the wavelength of the seismic wave, it causes constructive or destructive interference, known as tuning. This effect is often most noticeable at the boundary between different geological layers.

• Thin beds (layers that are thinner than the wavelength) cause tuning effects that can amplify or reduce the seismic reflection signals.
• The tuning thickness for seismic data is typically around a quarter of the dominant wavelength, meaning if the bed thickness is around this value, the reflection signal is maximized.

3. Hydrocarbon Identification

When hydrocarbons are present, they change the elastic properties of the rock, particularly:

• Velocity: Hydrocarbon-filled reservoirs often exhibit lower seismic velocities compared to water-filled reservoirs.
• Frequency dependence (Dispersion): The presence of hydrocarbons, especially gas, tends to increase the dispersion effect, where velocity changes more significantly at different frequencies.
• Attenuation: Hydrocarbon-bearing layers also tend to cause more energy loss (attenuation) in seismic waves, especially at higher frequencies.

4. Practical Approach to Using Dispersion and Wavelet Thickness

• Spectral Analysis: By comparing the seismic response at different frequencies, one can observe dispersion effects. Hydrocarbon-bearing layers may show a frequency-dependent velocity reduction.
• Amplitude Versus Offset (AVO) Analysis: Seismic waves reflected from hydrocarbon-bearing layers often exhibit distinctive changes in amplitude with varying offset (angle of incidence). These changes can be enhanced by dispersion.
• Seismic Inversion: Inversion techniques can be applied to turn seismic reflection data into rock property models, where dispersion effects help delineate hydrocarbon zones.

5. Challenges and Interpretation

Identifying hydrocarbons based on seismic dispersion and wavelet thickness requires careful interpretation, as similar effects may occur due to lithological changes or fluid content variations. Advanced analysis methods, like Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) or Quantitative Seismic Interpretation (QSI), are often used to improve reliability.

Identifying hydrocarbons based on seismic dispersion and wavelet thickness requires careful interpretation, as similar effects may occur due to lithological changes or fluid content variations. Advanced analysis methods, like Full Waveform Inversion (FWI) or Quantitative Seismic Interpretation (QSI), are often used to improve reliability.

Additionally:

In seismic dispersion, if a wavelet thickens and then thins as it interacts with a reflector, it can indicate several underlying factors about the subsurface conditions. This behavior might suggest changes in the physical properties of the layers, such as variations in rock type, porosity, or fluid content, which can alter the seismic wave’s travel characteristics. For example, a thickening wavelet might encounter a layer with higher acoustic impedance due to increased density or rigidity, while thinning could indicate a transition to a layer with lower impedance. Additionally, changes in the wavelet’s thickness could reflect variations in the geometry of the subsurface layers, such as folds, faults, or other structural deformations. Complex reflector structures, such as variations in dip or angle, can also affect how the wavelet interacts with the reflector. Moreover, the propagation characteristics of the seismic wave, including velocity changes in the subsurface layers, can influence the wavelet’s thickness. Overall, these changes in the wavelet’s behavior provide valuable insights into the subsurface’s geological conditions and can aid in more accurate seismic data interpretation. Several geological scenarios can cause this phenomenon:

1. Layer Thickness Variation

The thickening and thinning of the wavelet's response could correspond to variations in the thickness of the geological layer (or reflector) itself.

• Thickening of the wavelet: This can indicate an increase in the thickness of a sedimentary layer or reservoir. Thicker layers can create stronger and broader reflections due to increased interaction with the seismic waves.
• Thinning of the wavelet: A thinning of the wavelet response might indicate that the layer is becoming thinner, approaching or falling below the seismic wavelength resolution. In this case, the wavelet reflections may become less distinct or experience interference from other reflectors.

2. Tuning Effects and Interference

Changes in wavelet thickness can be a result of tuning effects, where seismic wavelets constructively or destructively interfere depending on the thickness of the layer relative to the dominant seismic wavelength:

• Thickening of the wavelet: This could indicate that the layer is approaching the quarter-wavelength tuning thickness, leading to constructive interference, which strengthens the reflected signal.
• Thinning of the wavelet: As the layer thickness moves away from the tuning thickness, destructive interference can cause the reflection amplitude to weaken.

3. Changes in Lithology or Fluid Content

The thickening and thinning of the seismic wavelet could also reflect variations in the lithology (rock type) or fluid content within the reservoir:

• Thickening: A thickening wavelet might suggest a transition into a more porous or hydrocarbon-filled section of the reservoir, where seismic waves slow down and interact with a broader portion of the reflector.
• Thinning: A thinning wavelet could indicate a transition into a less porous, water-saturated, or tighter lithology, where seismic waves speed up and reflect from a thinner portion of the layer.

4. Hydrocarbon Saturation Changes

If the seismic wavelet thickens and then thins over a reflector, it could indicate variations in hydrocarbon saturation. For example:

• Thickening: As the hydrocarbon saturation increases in a reservoir, the dispersion effect becomes more pronounced, causing the seismic wavelet to broaden. This could happen if you're moving from a low-saturation zone to a high-saturation zone.
• Thinning: If the wavelet thins, it could suggest a reduction in hydrocarbon saturation or a transition from a hydrocarbon-bearing zone to a water-bearing zone.

5. Structural Variations

Wavelet thickening and thinning could also result from structural variations such as faulting, folding, or pinching out of the layer. In these cases:

• Thickening could be due to seismic waves encountering a structural high or thickening section of the layer.
• Thinning could correspond to a thinning of the layer, for instance, near the edge of a pinch-out or a structural low, where the layer diminishes or tapers off.

6. Anomalies Due to Fluid Substitution

As seismic waves pass through an area where fluid types change (e.g., from gas to oil or oil to water), the elastic properties of the rock change, leading to variations in the thickness of the wavelet. In such cases:

• Thickening: A thickening wavelet could be indicative of a transition into a gas-rich zone, where seismic velocities slow down and increase the interaction with the reflector.
• Thinning: A thinning wavelet might signal a transition back to water-saturated zones, where seismic velocities increase, shortening the wavelet interaction with the layer.

AVO vs Seismic Dispersion:

Seismic dispersion and Amplitude Versus Offset (AVO) are two distinct seismic analysis methods that offer different insights into subsurface conditions. Seismic dispersion examines how seismic wave velocity varies with frequency, revealing how different frequency components of a wave travel through subsurface materials at different speeds. This analysis helps understand the frequency-dependent behavior of seismic waves and can indicate changes in subsurface properties such as material stiffness, density, and porosity. It is particularly useful for analyzing complex geological features and variations in wave propagation.

In contrast, AVO focuses on how the amplitude of seismic reflections changes with the distance between the source and receiver, known as the offset. This technique reveals how reflection amplitudes vary with angle and provides valuable information about the acoustic properties of the subsurface, such as changes in impedance and fluid content. AVO is commonly used in hydrocarbon exploration and reservoir characterization to identify fluid contacts, estimate reservoir properties, and distinguish between different subsurface fluids and rock types.

Overall, seismic dispersion offers insights into frequency-dependent wave behavior and subsurface heterogeneity, while AVO provides information on reflection amplitude changes with offset, helping to characterize fluid content and rock properties. Both methods complement each other and contribute to a more comprehensive understanding of subsurface conditions.

Summary

In seismic dispersion, if a wavelet thickens and then thins over a reflector, it may indicate:

• Variations in layer thickness.
• Tuning effects related to constructive and destructive interference.
• Changes in lithology or fluid content.
• Hydrocarbon saturation changes.
• Structural variations or pinch-outs.
• Fluid substitution between gas, oil, and water.

Careful seismic interpretation and potentially integrating with other data (such as well logs or velocity analysis) are needed to pinpoint the exact cause of this phenomenon.

Seismic dispersion techniques are instrumental in detecting hydrocarbons by analyzing how seismic waves behave with varying frequencies as they travel through subsurface materials. By examining the frequency-dependent dispersion of these waves, geophysicists can potentially identify the presence of hydrocarbon deposits, which alter the seismic wave velocities and dispersion characteristics differently compared to water-saturated or solid rock layers. Additionally, the thickness of the wavelet—the fundamental unit of seismic signals—plays a role in determining the resolution and strength of the reflected signals. Thicker wavelets generally provide stronger reflections but with lower resolution, while thinner wavelets offer higher resolution but weaker signals. By combining seismic dispersion techniques with an understanding of wavelet thickness, geophysicists can more effectively distinguish hydrocarbon-bearing zones from other subsurface formations, such as water-saturated or solid rock layers, thereby enhancing the accuracy of hydrocarbon exploration and production efforts.

Talk to dispersion experts for more information - I have used Apex in the past - there could be others I do not know of.

https://www.apexspectral.com/

Disclaimer

The content discussed here represents the opinion of Deric Cameron only and is not indicative of the opinions of any other entity, Deric Cameron may or may not have had affiliation with. Furthermore, material presented here is subject to copyright by Deric Cameron, or other owners (with permission), and no content shall be used anywhere else without explicit permission. The content of this website is for general information purposes only and should not be used for making any business, technical or other decisions.