Not seeing the wood for the trees.

Dr Jonathan Evans. CEO and Chairman, Ash and Lacy.

A little reported, but portentous apartment block fire in Manchester on 28th October 2016 (The Cube, Advent Way) illustrates that we could instead be talking about catastrophic loss of life involving no ACM whatsoever.

No lives were lost that day thanks to the outstanding reaction of the Manchester fire crews, however a local resident observed that 'a dark red fireball tore its way up the building'.

High Pressure Laminates have a multi-layer composition, but you would struggle to twist the words in Clause 12.7 (Approved Document B) to apply to that external facing material. We must be observant when considering buildings that may be at risk, and not assume the absence of ACM is an assertion of safety.

Polyethylene ACM is undoubtedly dangerous for buildings of all heights, but the paramount issue is that any combustible material in the fabric of a building represents a potential hazard. At the excellent LABC fire safety conference last week, there was much debate on how to minimize fire risk through improved installer training, sprinkler systems, clearer regulations, tighter building control etc. I found myself repeatedly pointing out that the resolute removal of combustible materials would obviate much argument and dramatically reduce the need for complex and perplexing regulations. Trying to safely accommodate combustible materials in construction consumes an enormous amount of valuable time and effort.

As long as combustible materials are permitted in the fabric of a building, our safety hangs from the tenuous threads of workmanship standards and moral integrity. As such, we are fated to live in a world where the next tragedy awaits us.


Richard Scott

Head of Member Support at LABC

7 年

I really enjoyed your presentation at the conference, it was interesting to get the manufacturers perspective. We'll have to see what recommendations come out of the inquiry and review. Everyone with an interest should take the time to provide their feedback for consideration. We certainly do not want to see another tragedy

回复
Dr Jonathan Evans CEng FIMechE

CEO, Ash & Lacy ? Est. 1864 - Innovation, integrity and metal processing technology in Construction, Aerospace & Automotive applications.

7 年

Peter, I am guessing that the DCLG will not quickly change regs because it might be seen as an admission that they're inadequate and pass the bill for rectification straight to the government. Within the context of external walls and load bearing components in construction, I am proposing for discussion: An immediate and total cessation of the use of unmodified polymers such as polyethylene, polystyrene and polyurethane. Any building above 18m should have an external wall system of limited combustibility apart from minor components such as thermal breaks, vapour membranes (which should be on the building side of a continuous insulation layer) washers and minor gaskets. This is to apply to the entire building, not just the part of it above 18m. Within two years, this would extend to all load bearing elements and the height reduced to 10m. Within five years, all open block or foiled polymer insulation removed from all construction. This leaves the huge composite panel market open to plastic foam insulation which seems to have a good safety record with thoroughly tested, steel encased, robust products.

Dr Jonathan Evans CEng FIMechE

CEO, Ash & Lacy ? Est. 1864 - Innovation, integrity and metal processing technology in Construction, Aerospace & Automotive applications.

7 年

Rav, I'm sure no stone will be left unturned in this investigation but it will be probably years before we hear anything. Read the posts by Ian Abley regarding fire stops.

回复

Curious to see that this article, like so many others, speaks about non-combustible materials, rather than materials of limited combustibility. The main thing that our industry should have learned in the last few weeks is that there are are several classifications and to recognise which are relevant to each case.

回复
Mark Winstanley

Business Development /Specification Consultant. 30 years experience, IFE Level 3 Passive Fire Protection

7 年

Couldnt agree more even putting aside the complexity of identifying and training competant installers who may well not be chosen throgh the design and build process. The bigger problem would be enforcing and policing this. Insisting on using non combustible materials where they exist in the short term at least has to be the way forward to try to avoid loss of life.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dr Jonathan Evans CEng FIMechE的更多文章

  • Would "anybody" have heeded the Grenfell warnings?

    Would "anybody" have heeded the Grenfell warnings?

    The Grenfell Inquiry showed that warnings had been ignored, crucial information suppressed & the development of fire…

    14 条评论
  • The BSB, the BLO, the CPCA and OMG

    The BSB, the BLO, the CPCA and OMG

    If you’re involved in the construction industry and haven’t heard of the new Construction Product Cause of Action, I…

    18 条评论
  • Was Brian Martin the Canary in the Regulatory Coalmine?

    Was Brian Martin the Canary in the Regulatory Coalmine?

    There've been more shocking days at the Grenfell Tower Inquiry, but none more important than yesterday. Mr Millett…

    35 条评论
  • Why Class 0 is not a surface classification

    Why Class 0 is not a surface classification

    Why Class 0 is not a surface classification The Grenfell Tower Inquiry is about to hear pivotal evidence about the…

    14 条评论
  • PAS9980 – when you thought things couldn’t get any worse

    PAS9980 – when you thought things couldn’t get any worse

    Introduction I was worried when EWS1 was announced as a potential solution to the developing mortgage crisis for blocks…

    54 条评论
  • If Judith Hackitt led the Covid-19 response ...

    If Judith Hackitt led the Covid-19 response ...

    In the Industry Safety Steering Group's epic 22-page report published this week, Dame Judith praises the construction…

    25 条评论
  • The Land of Confusion?

    The Land of Confusion?

    In my article of 25 November 2019, I discussed the two 18 m thresholds contained within Section 12 of Approved Document…

    21 条评论
  • The Height of Confusion?

    The Height of Confusion?

    The Cube fire on November 15th 2019 was a brutal reminder that buildings up and down the country have dangerous…

    63 条评论
  • The role of the Professional Engineer, post Grenfell.

    The role of the Professional Engineer, post Grenfell.

    Statements from DCLG following the Grenfell fire gave the impression that desktop studies may already be a thing of the…

    11 条评论
  • "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it." Winston Churchill

    "Those who fail to learn from history are doomed to repeat it." Winston Churchill

    Something feels very odd about Dame Judith Hackitt's Interim Report. There are bits missing as if it's been edited by…

    24 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了