SEE, DECIDE, ACT
Michael Ballé
Author, 5 times winner Shingo Prize Award, Editorial Board Member of Planet-Lean, co-founder Lean Sensei Partners, Co-Founder Institut Lean France. Advocate of managing by collaborative problem solving
Why did the machine stop? There was an overload and the fuse blew.
?Why was there an overload? The bearing was not sufficiently lubricated
?Why was it not lubricated sufficiently? The lubricating pump was not pumping sufficiently
?Why was it not pumping sufficiently? The shaft of the pump was worn and rattling
?Why was the shaft worn out? There was no strainer attached and metal scrap got in
?Recognize this? This is the classic 5 why example from Taiichi Ohno’s book on the Toyota Production System. Interestingly, very few other examples can be found in the lean literature. Why is five why so hard? Because you have to know what you’re looking inside out before you attempt to ask why five times. Insight is born from connecting two apparently unconnected facts, which requires to know the facts beforehand. To conduct the preceding analysis, you have to know that:
In order to recognize what you’re seeing you need to have a strong functional mental model of the machine – or your five why will take you in any silly directions.
?I had that experience with a therapeutic pool not working in a hospital for trauma patients:
?Why is the pool not available? Because the pump is not working
?Why is the pump not working? Because the fuse blew
?Why did the fuse blow? Because the pump was over strained
?Why was the pump overstrained? Because the water filters were clogged with lime
?Why were the filters clogged? Local water was very hard and filters not changed often enough
?It looks straightforward but we flayed around for hours until the maintenance specialist showed up and went straight to the filters: it was simple for him – he knew where to look.
?There are two bottlenecks to mindful action. First attention: knowing where to look. Second, decision: choosing what to do. Which leads to third, action: knowing how to do.
SEE —> DECIDE —> ACT
?Attention is the first real bottleneck here. Although we can know a quasi-infinite number of things, our minds can largely focus on only one thing at a time, which is why talking on the speaker phone while driving is so dangerous. This is intuitive to anyone. The second bottleneck is harder to see. Recognizing things we already know in our context is natural and feels great, particularly if they seem new. It feels like we learn things. The harder part is mobilizing existing knowledge in situations. We often think of a better way to do things after the fact. We knew it already but couldn’t access it. Familiarity makes an enormous difference.
?In order to truly learn, we need to backtrack the process, which feels profoundly unfamiliar and often almost painful:
?Review actions —> Challenge decisions —> look at the situation differently
?In Ohno’s example, learning occurs when we learn to look at where scrap metal goes in as opposed to the fuse. In my pool example, it means looking at the filters rather than at the pump. Learning occurs when we change what we look at.
?Visual management, which is unique to lean, is a way to take advantage of this cognitive process. By highlighting visually what to look at, it speeds up the attentional process. But it also spurs the motivational need for action. As psychologists have found out, it’s very hard to motivate anyone to change their own behavior. Behavior is sticky and trying to convince someone of changing rarely works. However, a different context often does. The key to lasting motivation is to create a context in which people motivate themselves, which is what visualization does. Painting a spot as a resting place for a machine creates a spontaneous motivation to put it back in its place.
Setting up an andon board that lits up when people flag an abnormality creates a spontaneous motivation to go and see what is going on and help if we can. Stopping the line until the problem is solved creates additional urgency – it’s self-motivating.
Learning of new facts is easy, but often an illusion. We naturally enjoy confirming what we already know with further instances. True learning is hard because it starts with the discovery of looking at something else – something that didn’t seem so important to start with. Like stepping on a scale when you feel overweight. The controlling your behavior by looking at it every day and adapting as you go. This is essentially what Kanban does for a production process: by showing where finished parts overflow from the shop stock, we can look at the queue of incoming Kanban instruction and figure out what is going wrong. More importantly, we’re motivated to do so.
?From that perspective, the history of the Toyota Production System, the lean system outside of Toyota, is a history of building new visual control points and adapting planning and production processes accordingly. And it indeed starts with asking why? Again and again. But to ask why effectively, we have to know what we’re looking at. The first step to learning is learning to see.
?
?
?
Quality Improvement Professional | Driving Toward Something Greater
2 年On a tangent, the inside cover of this book contains the earliest reference to andon that I know of. If anyone out there in the Lean community knows more of this origination story, please let me know. Thank you!
OpEx | eLPA l PMO | Career Architect l eTPM l PROFESSOR | TOC | CONSULTANT| Lean Six Sigma | SUPPLY CHAIN | INDUSTRIAL ENGINEER | Industry 4.0 | UL/ETL| Cobot | Robot | Transforming organizations from Good to Great.
2 年Good post Michael Ballé I would like to make a point about why so hard to solve problems: typically firefighting is first step and often becomes final countermeasure (quick fix, often complex not easy fix). It is very hard to come with easy/simple solution/fix and on the other side, it is easy/quick to fix a problem. Western education promotes the latter. My 2nd comment is about “See, Decide, Act” I would add check/audit/confirm after implementation. Many times things change but often they regress back and go back old way or status. I highly recommend “inspect what to expect” mentality before change and how to sustain the gains.
TPS/TPPM @ GPS Global | True Lean Manufacturing, Mech Engineering
2 年Michael Balle', nice Yes... "The first step to learning is learning to see." in order to achieve Lean Learnings, that will produce Lean Knowledge! One must change the Standard Work or Invent the Lean Standard Work thru... Lean Learnings by removing the (7) Types of Waste.? "Always, look from the outside in"..., as I was taught. One will never find the true Lean Problem looking from the inside out. Over 20 some years ago, I would try and tell the stories of TPS/TPPM the (7) Types of waste to (17) GE Aviations USA Plants/Sites that I was to train said teams of 6-8 Employees a (TEAM). The trick is to position the Gemba Team member in a Lean visual, hearing, smelling, felling positions, of all 4 sides, + the top and bottom of the machine in question, then close your eyes1st for the machine to run fully thru its complete cycle (start to finish), then open your eyes and focus on all the other above positions, rotate the Team Members to other said positions repeat this 10 times and record all your Team "Lean Learnings", + all of your other team operator members Learnings, compile all data and have an open session of the team discussing the types of waste that was recorded and any adverse effect that the team may have seen, heard, smelled or felt that would have produced a defect. It was truly amazing to see the team see, do, & act with the combined learnings that were almost 90% of all the waste's and defect's that was learned very quickly and accurately that was discovered and fixed with in 3-5 days. Alas, when I would return to the same plant, months later for another Lean Assessment of said area, it had degraded back to its original waste and defect level of non-Lean. I asked the team why they had let the area revert back to the way it was before when they had acted on all the non-lean problems? They all replied as a team, their demand TT cycle had increased, they did not have the time or instructions of their Lean Std. Work to continue with their Lean Std. Work; their Lean Learnings by Management were discontinued, they were only to focus on meeting the new Higher TT of production demand only! This is exactly why Lean Teachings of Lean Learnings that will lead to Lean Knowledge in the 50% - 80% in all USA Companies percentile will never be achieved, due to Non-Lean Classical Management - "Over Manufacturing"! One can only have Lean Standard Work, either by adding Employees & or Machines and maintaining Lean Std. Work that eliminates all (7) Types of Waste in the Manufacturing Process!
People Leader
2 年'Why is 5 why so hard?'... I can't tell you how many people I've run into who treat this as a simple exercise expecting immediate results. Offering no training or anything more that a simple explanation of this tool. Appreciate this article and will add it to my library to share as needed.
Manager Production secteur industrie
2 年This is the basic for a good troubleshooting but not always used by maintenance team. Often focus to get a quick result instead of using an easy method.