Security dimensions of Russia’s Engagement with the Taliban

During its recent summit, the Russian-led Collective Security Treaty Organization (CTO) once again articulated the alliance’s concerns over the presence of terrorist groups in Afghanistan. The concern has been shared by other neighboring countries and global powers, given the potential for instability to spill over borders and affect regional security.

Outwardly, the Taliban regime has stated their commitment to preventing terrorist groups from using Afghan territory to launch attacks on other countries. However, the ability and willingness of the Taliban to enforce this commitment are questionable and under scrutiny. Several factors contribute to this uncertainty.

First, ideologically, the Taliban regime is not a monolithic policy making entity; it comprises factions with differing priorities and levels of extremism. This internal diversity can complicate the group's ability to implement cohesive policies, especially concerning international terrorism.

Second, the Taliban's ideological ties to other jihadist groups create a challenging dynamic. While they may seek international legitimacy and economic aid, they also have historical and ideological connections with groups like al-Qaeda, which complicates their stance on counterterrorism.

Third, the Taliban's desire for international recognition and economic support may motivate them to curb terrorist activities. However, they must balance this with maintaining support from hardline elements within their ranks and among their supporters.

Forth, although the Taliban's control over Afghanistan is absolute, the increasingly permissive and uncertain environment with a significant pool of unemployed armed labor, and abundance of weapons may lead to the emergence of new operational partnership between non-state armed groups.

Finally, the Taliban are also attempting to strike a delicate balance between fulfilling their ideological obligations to jihadist brethren on one hand and restraining their activities for geopolitical ends on the other.

Overall, the situation remains fluid, with the Taliban navigating a complex landscape of internal pressures, ideological commitments, and external expectations. The international community continues to monitor developments closely, seeking ways to engage with the Taliban while addressing security concerns.

However, it is unlikely that the Taliban will respond to fragmented pressure or will be ready to compromise without seeing credible challenges to their power. Only a joint regional roadmap based on a carrot and stick may become useful over time, provided it targets not only Kabul but mostly Kandahar.

?