Section 504 Updates: What Archived Content Does and Doesn't Mean for Document Accessibility.

Section 504 Updates: What Archived Content Does and Doesn't Mean for Document Accessibility.

The recent update to Section 504 of the Rehabilitation Act introduces significant changes impacting the digital accessibility of documents and other online content. One point of confusion is around the exemption for "archived documents." Here are the key details that apply to digital documents (PDF, Word docs, PPTs, etc.) and how to consider what is actually archived documents.

Accessibility Requirements & Responsibilities

1. WCAG 2.1 Compliance:

The update mandates that all web content and mobile applications provided by entities receiving federal financial assistance from the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) must comply with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines (WCAG) 2.1, Level A and AA standards. This applies to all such entities by May 2026 for larger organizations (15 or more employees) and by May 2027 for smaller ones (fewer than 15 employees).

2. Third-Party Responsibilities:

The rule extends digital accessibility requirements to content and applications provided by third parties on behalf of these entities. Contracts and agreements with vendors must ensure that digital deliverables meet accessibility standards.

It is important that, as an organization, you understand what it means to meet "accessibility standards."

The first, and most crucial, step is to acknowledge that passing the Acrobat Checker does not imply you have met any standard at all. See Adobe's disclaimer on the Acrobat Checker. https://www.adobe.com/accessibility/products/acrobat/using-acrobat-pro-accessibility-checker.html/

This reads: Note: While the Accessibility Checker helps evaluate the accessibility of a document and helps identify areas that may be in conflict with Adobe’s interpretations of the referenced guidelines, the Accessibility Checker can not automatically check all accessibility guidelines and criteria, including those in such referenced guidelines, and Adobe does not warrant that any documents will comply with any specific guidelines or regulations. Please consult with appropriate legal counsel for guidance on compliance with the referenced guidelines or any other accessibility guidelines.

3. Exceptions:

Certain types of digital content are exempt from these requirements. These include:

  1. Archived web content
  2. Preexisting conventional electronic documents
  3. User-generated content, such as public comments

However, these entities may still need to make such content accessible if it falls under other obligations to provide equal opportunities.

Exempt Archived Content Clarification

Any digital documents, like PDFs, PowerPoint and Word files, must still be made accessible if they are part of the current, active web content provided to visitors. This involves ensuring proper tagging for screen readers, alt text for images, and navigable structure through headings and links. The following gives a little more clarity on the exemptions.

Archived Content Language:

Preexisting electronic documents that are "not currently in use or needed for active services" may be considered archived and are exempt from the new requirements.

However, new or actively used documents must be updated to meet accessibility standards.

This makes it very clear that any content offered to visitors as active content must meet accessibility standards.

How long do we have?

  1. Organizations with 15 or more employees have until May 2026 to meet accessibility standards.
  2. For smaller organizations with fewer than 15 employees, the deadline extends to May 2027.

Source: https://www.reedsmith.com/en/perspectives/2024/05/hhss-section-504-final-rule-includes-digital-accessibility-standards

Broader Implications for Document Accessibility

These changes align Section 504 with modern accessibility expectations, similar to those under the Americans with Disabilities Act (ADA). By setting clear technical standards for digital content, the rule aims to reduce barriers and improve digital inclusion for individuals with disabilities in health and human services programs.

For more detailed information on the updates, you can refer to the HHS final rule found here: https://www.hhs.gov/civil-rights/for-individuals/disability/section-504-rehabilitation-act-of-1973/part-84-final-rule-fact-sheet/index.html)

Additional resources from the National Council on Disability can be viewed here: https://www.ncd.gov/newsroom/2024/section-504-update.

These updates represent a significant step toward ensuring that digital content is accessible and usable for everyone, particularly those with disabilities.

However, it is disappointing that the Federal Register PDF document provided on this very issue itself is not accessible! "No tags available" is unacceptable. We have to do better. https://www.govinfo.gov/content/pkg/FR-2024-05-09/pdf/2024-09237.pdf

If you want more information or training on how to know if your documents are accessible or if the documents produced by your accessibility departments or vendors meet the WCAG guidelines, reach out to me [email protected].


Steve Boehm

Editor and Accessibility Specialist, Publications Manager, Editor, and Editorial Coordinator

8 个月

I'm sharing this with our entire 508 team here. I've already been moving them to start checking with PAC in addition to Adobe's checker, and to improve our internal checklists to reflect WCAG 2.1 standards. The challenge is getting our federal clients to accept and enforce this standard with third-party presenters at their meetings. Their PowerPoints are a hot mess.

回复
Darren Denham CPACC, MCP

Assistant Director of Digital Accessibility | Award-winning Presenter | Accessibility (a11y) evangelist | Lifelong Learner | CPACC

8 个月

Great insights, Dax. It's crucial to clear up misconceptions around archived documents. I was reading the Rule yesterday and noticed how easily several aspects could be misunderstood. Your article provides a much-needed reality check for organizations.

Ricardo Garcia Bahamonde

Head of Accessibility & Digital Inclusion at Atos Iberia

8 个月

Thanks Dax Castro, ADS, great share!

David Herr, PMP, CPACC

Vice President of Enterprise Solutions & Partnerships

9 个月

Great article Dax as always!

回复
Miranda G.

Editor | Content Editing Expert: Seasoned copy editor in education management, books, and digital content. I help companies produce correct, clear, concise, and engaging writing.

9 个月

I think one reason that places try to slide by with the Adobe checker is because learning accessibility is a lot of work. Of course it's worth it, but it can also seem very daunting, especially since the requirements and the software keep changing. What we need is a standard for having accessibility education at all companies so that it doesn't seem like a niche, difficult thing to learn and so that employees have support in picking up those skills.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Dax Castro, ADS的更多文章

  • 7 Questions you should ask before creating an accessible infographic

    7 Questions you should ask before creating an accessible infographic

    1. What do we want the user experience to be? Understanding the intended user experience is crucial before creating an…

    7 条评论
  • What Type of Accessibility Training Do I Need?

    What Type of Accessibility Training Do I Need?

    1. Awareness Training Understanding the barriers readers face when trying to navigate or understand content is a key…

  • Are you still animating your PowerPoints?

    Are you still animating your PowerPoints?

    I thought fancy PowerPoint animations went out of style in 1996. Yet, here is a study that focuses on how animations…

    8 条评论
  • Why I never miss the CSUN AT Conference

    Why I never miss the CSUN AT Conference

    As remediators, it's easy to forget how the work we do affects real people. We spend countless hours poring over tags…

    20 条评论
  • ADHD: Benefit or Bane?

    ADHD: Benefit or Bane?

    Neurodiversity seems to be on the tip of everyone's tongues lately. But what is it exactly? It is the infinite…

    1 条评论
  • The Diversity and Social Models of Disability

    The Diversity and Social Models of Disability

    The Diversity and Social Models of Disability The social model of disability is a way of understanding disability that…

    6 条评论
  • Why is document accessibility so hard?

    Why is document accessibility so hard?

    Document accessibility refers to the practice of making sure that documents, such as PDFs, Word documents, and…

    10 条评论
  • Race and Ethnic Origin: Why it matters to me.

    Race and Ethnic Origin: Why it matters to me.

    I, Albert (Dax) Julian Castro, tried to apply for Minority Business Enterprise status in the state of California and…

    14 条评论
  • How Testing During Design Phase Improves User Experience

    How Testing During Design Phase Improves User Experience

    As content creators, we can develop clearer and more robust documents when we have a firm understanding as to how…

    1 条评论
  • The two most important keys to PDF Accessibility Remediation

    The two most important keys to PDF Accessibility Remediation

    The two most important keys to PDF Accessibility Remediation are arrow keys. Specifically, the down and right arrows.

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了