Section 35 of the Companies Act 2013

Section 35 of the Companies Act. Civil liability for misstatements in prospectus.

“ (1) Where a person has subscribed for securities of a company acting on any statement included, or the inclusion or omission of any matter, in the prospectus which is misleading and has sustained any loss or damage as a consequence thereof, the company and every person who-

(a) is a director of the company at the time of the issue of the prospectus;

(b) has authorised himself to be named and is named in the prospectus as a director of the company, or has agreed to become such director, either immediately or after some time;

(c) is a promoter of the company;

(d) has authorized the issue of the prospectus; and

(e) is an expert referred to in sub-section (5) of section 26, shall, without prejudice to any punishment to which any person may be liable under section 36, be liable to pay compensation to every person who has sustained such loss or damage.

(2) No person shall be liable under sub-section (1), if he proves-

(a) that, having consented to become a director of the company, he withdrew his consent before the issue of the prospectus, and that it was issued without his authority or consent; or

(b) that the prospectus was issued without his knowledge or consent, and that on becoming aware of its issue, he forthwith gave a reasonable public notice that it was issued without his knowledge or consent.

(3) Notwithstanding anything contained in this section, where it is proved that a prospectus has been issued with intent to defraud the applicants for the securities of a company or any other person or for any fraudulent purpose, every person referred to in subsection (1) shall be personally responsible, without any limitation of liability, for all or any of the losses or damages that may have been incurred by any person who subscribed to the securities based on such prospectus.”

Precedent on Section 35 of Companies Act – P.N.B Housing Finance Ltd. v. Karam Chand & Ors.–

PNB Housing Finance was the allegation by the SEBI against PNB Housing Finance and 12 individuals that PNB Housing Finance had violated the norms in preferential securities issuance to US-based Carlyle Group and a deal with Carlyle Group was scrapped later. The housing finance player, part of state-owned Punjab National Bank, and the 12 individuals, who were directors of the company as of May 31, 2021, jointly paid Rs 72.76 lakh towards settlement.

The amount includes Rs 44.26 lakh as legal costs, the Securities and Exchange Board of India (Sebi) said in an order on Tuesday.

The order came after PNB Housing Finance along with its directors approached Sebi proposing to settle the alleged violations of LODR (Listing Obligations and Disclosure Requirement) rules in the Carlye Group case “without admitting or denying the findings” through a settlement order.

Scope of liability under Section 35 of the Companies Act

• What is a Mis-statement of the prospectus:

A statement included in a prospectus shall be deemed to be untrue if the statement is misleading in the form or context or if there is any omission from the prospectus in any manner to mislead. A liability arises when any person subscribes for any shares or debentures based on content provided in the prospectus. If any person suffers loss or damages due to untrue information in the prospectus.

• Who can be held liable for the damages under Section 35 of the Companies Act, 2013?

Section 35(1) prescribed the parties who are liable for the violation the provisions are

1. Directors play a key role in every action of the company, directors are responsible for all the decisions for ensuring the prospectus’s accuracy. If the director fails due diligence while preparing the prospectus.
2. Promoters are also held responsible for looking after the company’s formation and public offering as information is issued in the prospectus.
3. Reports or statements made by experts appearing in the prospectus can be held liable if is proved that the intention of misleading.
4. Signatories are those who sign the prospectus, including auditors, legal advisors, and brokers, and become legally bound to the civil liabilities.
5. Others: Those who are intentionally participated in the misleading act also liable under this provision.

How Board of Directors is held liable for offenses?

There is a collective involvement of the Board in taking any business actions for the company. Sometimes there is collective Board liability or individual directors held liable as per the involvement in the malafide act.

The liabilities can arise for various reasons as given here:

1. Liability of the company for fraud
2. Liability to the third parties
3. Liability for breach of warranty
4. Liability for breach of statutory duties
5. Liability for acts of another director
6. Criminal Liability

Conclusion

Section 35 deals with key provisions for the criminal liabilities for the misstatement in the prospectus by the company in the form of imposing penalties or damages. It also provides the defenses available against it. Also, this provision acts as a safeguard by imposing civil liabilities for those who are involved in misstatements with misleading intentions.

To know more, visit: Section 35 of the Companies Act 2013