Secondments and Non-Academic Placements
Jitka Eryilmaz
Director of pre-award department @EFMC-Estonia/ CEO of EFMC-Czechia
MSCA- Postdoctoral Fellowships proposals may include an optional secondment during the fellowship and/or add an optional non-academic placement period, provided they are in-line with the project objectives and add significant value and/or impact to the fellowship.
Note: 50% of proposals that are requesting Non-Academic Placements or Secondments are declared as ineligible/inadmissible; results collected from the MSCA-PF-2021 call (Figure 1.)
Be aware, Secondments and Non-Academic Placements are different in nature and follow different set of rules. Secondment is a temporary transfer to another entity in any sector, anywhere in the world at any time during the action, typically to perform part of the research or to gain experience. Secondments do not have a separate budget. Non-academic placements also involve mobility to another entity, located in an EU member state or associated country, but can only take place to an organisation in the non-academic sector and after the end of the regular duration of the project. Non-academic placements have a dedicated budget. Both secondments and placements are expected to include supervision, to bring a clear added value to the research proposal, and should be covered by the employment contract with the beneficiary.
Secondments:
Researchers receiving a Postdoctoral Fellowship may opt to include a secondment phase, within the overall duration of their fellowship. The secondment phase can be a single period or be divided into shorter mobility periods.
Placements in the non-academic sector
Researchers may also opt for an additional period of up to six months to seek a placement at the end of the project to work on R&I projects in an organisation from the non-academic sector established in an EU Member State or Horizon Europe Associated Country.
While this possibility is also available to fellows recruited in the non-academic sector, such a placement must be implemented at a different non-academic host organisation established in an EU Member State or Horizon Europe Associated Country!
领英推荐
Short Visits
Note that secondments and non-academic placements are to be distinguished from short visits. Short visits imply mobility to another location outside the physical premises of the beneficiary, including internationally. However, the work done there continues to be supervised directly by the supervisor of the host beneficiary. Short visits can only represent a small part of the project duration and must not be encoded as participating organisations in the submission forms.
In the MSCA-PF proposal, the non-academic sector placement must be encoded in part A and described in part B. In Part B1 (under sub-criterion 1.3 and 3.1 & 3.2), the relevance and added value of the non-academic placement period will be assessed by the evaluators and may therefore impact the final score awarded to the proposal.?
Therefore, in the Part B1 you should consider the followings:
Note: There is no need for detailed work plan for the non-academic placement, but it must be mentioned in the Gantt chart and noted, where relevant, in the research work packages!
For non-academic placement host: Explain the integration into research team/environment, that you will have access to research/technical and administrative infrastructure and dedicated work place.
In Part B2, the non academic placement host must provide an up to date letter of commitment, to be submitted with the application, confirming their precise role and active participation in the proposal.
Overview of the Secondments and non-Academic Placements Rules are summarized in the Table 1.
Marie Sk?odowska-Curie Postdoctoral Fellow | PhD in (Photo)electrochemistry
1 年Hi Jitka, Thank a lot for all the informative article! Ihave a question regarding non-academic placement (NAP). Is it possible to specify an entire work package for NAP, such as acquiring skills with company in product commercialization (related to research) and spin-off ? Also, what i noticed that you mentioned that for NPA a letter of commitment is required, but in this document (https://rea.ec.europa.eu/system/files/2023-06/Guide%20for%20applicants_MSCA%20PF%202023%20rev%202.1%20.pdf) its written "not required". Please, can ypu comment on this? Thanks and regards
Research Officer at Stockholm University /former Researcher (UU)
1 年I am very grateful for the article. Thank you!
MSCA Postdoctoral Fellow at the University of Girona
1 年Thanks for the article, very interesting and informative! :) I am curious about the data mentioned in Figure 1. I could't find the original source, but based on another presentation where this was shown, I am assuming this is relative to proposals including a NAP (whether or not they included also a secondment) and the 2% in the pie chart represents those proposal where the NAP was wrongly included as a secondment, is that right? Also, the pie chart shows inadmissible NAP, but does this imply that the entire proposal in ineligible? Or is it just the placement that will not be funded? Kind regards!
Research & Development
1 年Thanks, very interesting!