The Secondary Ticket Market Is The Primary Market For Consumers

The Secondary Ticket Market Is The Primary Market For Consumers

Without Google, Inc.’s birth in 2000, the secondary ticket market wouldn’t be where it is today. And that’s not a bad thing, because for the first time in history, fans have more choices when they purchase tickets. Not just on price, but location, opponent, and when how they invest their dollars.

SEO Matters

Prior to Google’s search engine optimization (SEO), tickets were distributed solely through the primary ticket market. The brokers that tickets only dealt with teams, and sold on a minimal level simply by virtue of their distribution access. After SEO, ticket resellers sat on par with the primary ticket market, meaning that they could sell to the exactly same customers as the teams did online. And in many cases, ticket brokers have often done a better job of catering to the general consumer than the sports teams do.

Ticket reselling is that billion dollar business that every consumer loves to hate, especially when the media writes stories about inflated prices. But here’s the thing, no one has to buy any tickets on at any price point that they believe is unfair. They can just sit at home, and if the ticket reseller can’t find a buyer, as the event goes closer, often the prices drop. But that’s not all, the consumer now has the ability to control location, opponent and other factors, simply by not purchasing until they choose to. And all without being locked into a long-term package of financial investment, such as a mini-pack or season ticket, by a team.

The Consumers Choice Is The Secondary Ticket Market

This is what the secondary ticket market has done. It has become the primary ticket market for a majority of the consumers. And each team has reacted to this not by figuring out ways to adapt through digital means. Instead, the majority of teams are still focusing on sawmill sales staffs tactics, where young sports account executives new to the business make 100+ phone calls per day. Here’s the rub in all of it: Even the kids hired today know that the practice that they are undertaking is rather silly, outdated, and not working.

In January 2016, up to 40 sports executives were fired from Madison Square Garden, for ticket reselling their own product. They legitimately purchased their tickets from their parent company, then resold them on the secondary ticket market. Because those executives understood what MSG and others want to deny. MSG should have asked why this practice of purchasing primary tickets and flipping them on the secondary market was working, but they did not.

Digital Is King, Not The Phone

The majority of consumers are buying off of digital means, and they aren’t generally buying long-term packages such as season tickets. Most would rather pay higher premiums, up-front, for a single game ticket in a better seat location to the exact game that they want, rather than pay less, for a multi-game package in an okay seat location to three dog games plus the game that they really want.

There’s a lot to be learned about the secondary ticket market, both in the lawsuits against closed market practices, as well as the leagues and teams reaction to it. In the new sports marketing textbook, Sport Business Analytics, I wrote about the secondary ticket market overcoming the primary market, as well as some of the legal actions that have taken place. Not just the 2015 StubHub dismissed suit against The Golden State Warriors and Ticketmaster, but also The Ticket Wars legislation which has been waged in the state of Florida over the years with massive lobbying efforts for a closed system.

All of this comes down to consumer choice and the inability for sports executives to adapt to the digital age. While sports executives have resisted the allure of the secondary ticket market or its technology, ticket brokers have become more innovative. I’m surprised that the brokers themselves haven’t decided to charge the sports teams to sell their tickets. Often, they are creating way more conversions than the 100-phone-calls-per-day metric. And its showing… continually…

Note: You can order Sport Business Analytics textbook to read up on several the issues surrounding the legalities of the secondary ticket market in Chapter 3. In it, I look at various trends and narratives such as the L.A. Dodgers’ ticket flooding from 2013-15, Tom Brady’s 2015 Weeks 1-4 “almost suspension” and the Pacquiao-Mayweather fight:

-      Order today at Amazon (in hardback or kindle)

-      Order today through the Publisher.

_________________________________________________________________

Troy Kirby has helped generate revenue for three college athletic departments and professional teams. Owner of The Tao of Sports, which focuses on Sports Sales & Revenue Analytics, Kirby has interviewed over 600 sports executives for a three-times per week podcast and writes daily about sports business, including the secondary market. Founder/President of NAATSO, the only college ticket association, as well as the creator of The Sport Sales Boot Camp. Kirby is also a frequent contributor to The Association of Luxury Suite Director's quarterly publication, SEAT Magazine, and Ticketing Today.


Brad Schy

Founder & President, Musical Chairs Ticket Service

8 年

Great article Troy. The funniest thing is when we get calls from these team marketing geeks wanting to sell us tickets. My favorite is the Clippers Sales Reps. One called and told me they are not supposed to sell tickets to brokers. I asked, "so why are you calling me?" He said, "Well I dont have to know what you are doing with the tickets." My Second favorite is the Miami Marlins story. They threatened or actually revoked one guy's tickets for selling them on the secondary market. They threatened another guy with a lawsuit if he intended to breach his contract and not renew his tickets as his contract required. I suggested that perhaps the one who wanted to get out of his contract simply put them up for sale on the secondary market. Interestingly, this all begs the question-Who the hell wants Miami Marlins tickets in the first place.

Ken Hanscom

Chief Operating Officer, TicketManager | Board Member | Investor | Team USA Supporter

8 年

Troy, this is a great case study on the nature of the Innovator's Dilemma and the willingness (or not) of incumbent businesses to adopt or adapt to disruptive technology. Of course, now these disruptive technologies are well established and in doing so to your point have taken over the primary market for the consumers. And yet still today, the incumbents are still battling rather than leveraging.

Matt Dewire

Working to create a memorable experience for fans

8 年

Troy, love everything you say here. It's just simply teams need to quit being archaic about the secondary market and figure out how to wield it like a weapon. Many in leadership roles are looking towards the wrong things with secondary. As always my friend, a great read.

Andrew Browne

Co-Founder @ Thin Air Labs | Startup Services, Venture Capital

8 年

It's interesting that Monumental S & E decided to implement this after the Yankees tried it and it flopped. I wonder how many secondary tickets go unsold through their own system. So I guess teams must decide "do we try to capture the transactional revenue we're missing out on by internalizing the secondary market, taking tickets off of established secondary markets that consumers have adapted to?" or "do we capture revenue from making sure every ticket we sell gets used, even if it's resold somewhere outside our control.".

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Troy Kirby的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了