SEC hits Prager Metis with hundreds of audit violations

SEC hits Prager Metis with hundreds of audit violations

The SEC charged Prager Metis CPAs LLP, a Top 100 Firm based in New York and its California affiliate, with violating auditor independence rules on hundreds of occasions, and more of today’s top stories.?

Sign up here to receive Accounting Today's Daily Newsletter — delivered to your inbox every morning.

SEC hits Prager Metis with hundreds of audit violations

The SEC complaint accused the firm of improperly including indemnification provisions in engagement letters for hundreds of audits, reviews and examinations.?

In other news today:

The top apps for accountants for 2023

Leading practitioners and accounting technology experts share their favorite tools for work and life.

Nearly 1,000 millionaires haven't filed tax returns

Close to a thousand taxpayers who earn over $1 million a year failed to file tax returns over multiple recent years, potentially owing $34 billion in taxes, according to IRS data.

Internal auditors eye top global risks

Cybersecurity and human capital rank as the top risks among internal auditors around the world, according to a new survey.

PCAOB adopts new audit confirmation standard

The standard reflects the many changes in technology, communications and business practices since an interim standard was first adopted decades ago.

GASB proposes rules for disclosing and classifying gov't capital assets

The board floated a proposal to set requirements for some types of capital assets to be disclosed separately for purposes of note disclosures.

Mark Spelker

Chief Financial Officer

1 年

Pretty basic stuff!

回复
OBINNA AHANNA

Business Accountant | Higher National Diploma in Banking, Corporate, Finance

1 年

those are the congressmen

回复
Robert Boyle

Financial Executive for US Based Manufacturing, Logistics and Technology Companies.

1 年

These are obvious serious charges, but I have a little bit of a different take. From reading the details, it looks like the fact pattern is PM acquired a firm performing public company work (for which PM had little prior experience), internally identified the issue of indemnification clauses in engagement letters, and subsequently remediated the issue. It seems it took longer than optimal to remediate, but it seems to have been nonetheless fixed. What I find troubling is this fact pattern sounds very similar to the internal quality control issues found at the SEC itself, yet the charges and proposed penalties are far worse than the SEC imposed upon itself. It isn't even close. I don't have an issue with accountability, but if we are going to have accountability, everyone needs to be accountable.

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了