The search for quality: secrets to success
Paul Budgen
FinTech Co-Founder | International Financial Services | Strategy | Growth and Revenue | Pension and Retirement
When you’re booking a dinner in a restaurant that you haven’t eaten at before or a hotel that you’ve never visited, what do you do to make sure that you’re making the right choice? Some people look for a TripAdviser rating, recommendations from family or friends. Or maybe you look at the website and try and find some pictures? I usually do at least one of these and when I haven’t I’ve paid the price. But that’s just a meal or an overnight stay. When it comes to choosing a pension scheme, making an informed choice is even more important. The scheme an employer uses for auto enrolment is looking after workers’ money and, therefore, their futures. Whether you’re an employer choosing a scheme for your workers or an adviser helping an employer, what can you look for so that you know you’re making the right decision?
At the recent Pension and Lifetime Savings Association (PLSA) annual conference we took part in the Learning Hub, running a session on what badges of quality you could look for from a master trust. It sparked some really interesting discussions and it helped us identify four questions that employers and their advisers can ask themselves before picking a scheme.
Are they PQM ready?
The PLSA Pension Quality Mark READY status is awarded to schemes meeting their high standards. These standards include good governance, low charges and clear member communications. Choosing a PQM READY scheme means if employers pass the contributions element, they’ll be awarded a Pension Quality Mark themselves. PLSA publish a list of pension schemes that have achieved PQM ready status online so you can check for your scheme. NEST is PQM ready of course!
Are they MAF accredited?
A master trust assurance framework (MAF) report demonstrates that a master trust is meeting good standards of administration and governance. It was designed to help employers and their advisers identify good quality schemes for auto enrolment and to build confidence in pension saving. The Pensions Regulator (TPR) publishes a list of accredited master trusts, of which NEST is one.
Are they a responsible investor?
This means thinking more broadly about how the companies and markets they invest in are run, how they generate profits and how they treat people and the planet. Being an active and responsible investor is another way of making the most of members’ investments. In our view organisations that are well-run have the best chance of sustaining success & profitability long term. NEST’s recent Responsible Investment report explains more about our approach to responsible investment and why it matters.
Have they won industry awards?
If a scheme has a track record for award success it means they’ve been judged by their peers, who are usually experts in their fields and have achieved high standards. Awards can be general, the for example, best pension scheme or focus on a particular element, for example its investment strategy. NEST has already won a significant number of awards, including for best pension scheme, innovation and investment approach. You see some recent examples on our website www.nestpensions.org.uk.
Like a lot of decisions in life, our judgement is based on taking an objective balanced view. While we can recover from a bad meal or a disappointing hotel room, the cost of getting your pension choice wrong can be much greater. Ensuring the scheme you choose meets core standards, measured independently, is one way of being confident you’re on the right path.
Strategy | Proposition Development | Workplace Wealth | Business Development| Customer Experience | Platform Design | Digital Transformation
8 年Twice in one day I am agreeing with you Paul...a monthly employer fee would make perfect sense!I think whilst some providers bang on about it being free the market is not working at is best. Now if you have L and G waiting patiently for ROI that might work but how long will DWP wait? at least a monthly employer fee from Nest would give some certainty to the debt repayment and Nest can become sustainable in a set time frame. Pension Bill seeks to ensure that ALL mastertrusts are sustainable and have a coherent business plan. Such a plan must include a clear plan to manage debt and all the quality measures under the sun dont help if the product is not sustainable. Monthly fees...... I wait for the announcement!
Strategy | Proposition Development | Workplace Wealth | Business Development| Customer Experience | Platform Design | Digital Transformation
8 年Paul I cant disagree with a flight to quality and the measures you highlight are all prudent. But you opening analogy about dinner in a restaurant I am afraid does not work....you see imagine me booking a table for my 100 or so staff to say thank you for all their hard work in administering the £2.75bn of assets we run in workplace pensions. A table for 100 please and let everyone have a "default" menu with a vegan option (lets call that ethical) and a halal option (lets call that Sharia) and a kiddies menu ( lets call that the Foundation) and everyone says thank for the quality, kite marked .accredited, responsible, award winning meal and I say you are very welcome.......Then Paul........ the bill comes and I am told "Dont worry Mr Peacock the tax payer has picked up the bill. Why thank you" I say. ........But as each of my staff get up to leave they are asked to pay the restaurant 1.8% of the bill to repay the tax payer........That is a very popular restaurant now for employers that does not sound like a place many employees would want to eat at again......Oh and the Waiter has also locked the doors until some time mid 2017 so my staff cant leave. I have often described this lock in ....staying on your analogy,......... as " The Hotel California of the workplace pensions world............. I welcome a flight to quality I really do but Nest is a market disruptor and is not meeting the market failure measure that it was built for as the market if anything has over supply! Time for Nest to be commercial and make the business decision to ask employers to pay their bill and reduce the burden on members alone. This would also allow Nest to demonstrate a clear plan in repaying is circa £500m debt to the tax payer and continue to compete with tax payers support of course!
Mo?t Hennessy USA Partners
8 年Why not celebrate the fact that NEST want to remain as good option, rather than drif towards mediocrity like too many others have?
Head of Platform Sales, HUB Financial Solutions
8 年The article is fine, what I am struggling with is why NEST which was created to ensure that there was no market failure, and is funded by the tax-payer is trying to compete in this way.
Great article Paul! I would have also included the experience/quality of the workforce behind the scheme to your list. And NEST certainly scores highly on that front.