SCOTUS takes on abortion again, billionaires sought to help fund Trump's bond, SpaceX lawsuit says DOJ judges not properly appointed, and more ??
Illustration: Meriam Telhig/REUTERS

SCOTUS takes on abortion again, billionaires sought to help fund Trump's bond, SpaceX lawsuit says DOJ judges not properly appointed, and more ??

?? Good morning from The Legal File! Here is the rundown of today's top legal stories:

?? Supreme Court starts arguments as Biden administration defends abortion pill access

File Photo: A container holding boxes of Mifepristone, the first medication in a medical abortion, are prepared for patients at Alamo Women's Clinic in Carbondale, Illinois, U.S., April 20, 2023. REUTERS/Evelyn Hockstein

The U.S. Supreme Court began hearing arguments on whether to restrict access to the abortion pill as President Joe Biden's administration fights to maintain broad access to the medication in a major case that thrusts reproductive rights back on the agenda of the justices in a presidential election year.

The Biden administration has appealed a lower court's ruling that would limit how the medication, called mifepristone, is prescribed and distributed. Four medical associations and four doctors who oppose abortion brought the challenge to mifepristone in Texas.

The Food and Drug Administration's regulatory changes at risk in the case include allowing for medication abortions at up to 10 weeks of pregnancy instead of seven, and for mail delivery of the drug without a woman first seeing a clinician in-person.

Read more.


?? Billionaires sought to help fund Trump bond in civil fraud case, sources say

REUTERS/Marco Bello

Some major Republican donors were working together to help U.S. presidential candidate Donald Trump fund the original bond amount needed to cover his $454 million civil fraud judgment ahead of the March 25 deadline, three sources briefed on the matter told Reuters.

Trump needs to pay a bond in a New York civil case in which he was found liable for fraudulently inflating his net worth by billions of dollars to secure better loan and insurance terms.

On March 25, he won a bid to delay the enforcement of the judgment if he posts a smaller $175 million bond within 10 days, but until that last-minute reprieve he appeared to be struggling to raise the original amount and risked having his properties seized.

More on the donors here.

Related stories:


?? In Christine Blasey Ford’s memoir, the making of a witness

File Photo: Christine Blasey Ford testifies during the Senate Judiciary Committee hearing on Capitol Hill in Washington, DC, U.S., September 27, 2018. Tom Williams/Pool via REUTERS?

In her new memoir "One Way Back,"?Christine Blasey Ford?offers behind-the-scenes details of how in accusing then-Supreme Court?nominee?Brett Kavanaugh?of sexually assaulting her when they were teens, she found herself in the spotlight.

Kavanaugh has vigorously denied the allegations.

In her latest column,?Jenna Greene?dives into the memoir and Ford’s account of?how her pro bono legal team helped (and sometimes hindered) her in telling her story.?

Read the column here.


?? SpaceX lawsuit could gut protections for non-US citizen job seekers, DOJ says

REUTERS/Dado Ruvic

SpaceX's lawsuit claiming administrative judges at the U.S. Department of Justice have been improperly appointed could dramatically curb enforcement of a federal law barring discrimination against job applicants based on citizenship, the department told a Texas federal judge.

The Justice Department in a motion for summary judgment filed in federal court in Brownsville, Texas, on March 22 said that because rulings by administrative judges can be reviewed by the U.S. attorney general, they do not have to be appointed by the president and confirmed by the U.S. Senate as SpaceX claims.

SpaceX in a lawsuit filed last year alleged that administrative judges appointed by the attorney general who hear citizenship bias cases filed by DOJ wield executive power that, under the U.S. Constitution, should be reserved only for presidential appointees.

Justice Department lawyers wrote:

"The legal theories advanced by (SpaceX) could, if accepted, eliminate all enforcement of an important civil rights statute."

Read more.


?? That's all for today, thank you for reading?The Legal File, and have a great day!

For more legal industry news, read and subscribe to The Daily Docket .

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Reuters Legal的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了