The Science of How and Why Phantom Vibration Occurs
We all understand the joys of our always-wired world—the connections, the validations, the laughs … the info. … But we are only beginning to get our minds around the costs. -?Andrew Sullivan (2016)
It’s a singularly modern problem, but also one rooted deep in human biology: Sometimes people feel their cell phones vibrating on their skin when there is no cell phone around. You’ve probably felt it yourself. In one study, 89 percent of participants had experienced these phantom vibrations.?
Victims have started calling the response “vibranxiety” or “ringxiety.”?
Given that more than half the people on our planet carry a cellular phone, vibrate mode usage is quite common. For a certain percentage, moderate to severe symptoms of phantom vibrations will result in symptoms that may need treatment.
The science of how and why phantom vibration occurs
My work and research is at the interface of the brain and the skin; my co-author Corey S. Powell is a veteran science journalist with a fondness for offbeat research. I also have a personal connection: I was treating Kevin G., a 27-year-old who saw me for skin issues, when he mentioned a problem that was driving him a bit batty. “I constantly feel my pocket vibrating, and when I check I find that my cell phone is in another pocket, or sometimes it’s still in my car. Is there something I can do about this?”
The answer is surprisingly complicated. For many researchers, including Jack Tsao, an assistant professor of neurology at the Uniform Services University in Maryland, the phenomenon has a physiological basis, related to phantom limb. Given that both skin cells and brain cells develop from the same kind of embryonic tissue (ectoderm), it makes sense that there are numerous ways that we can manifest those connections. In the case of an amputated leg, the neurons that control the leg’s movement and sensation still exist in the brain. The brain can also provide vibrations to your right thigh like a phantom limb.
That addresses the how. As for the why, Jon Kaas, a professor of psychiatry at Vanderbilt University, studies phantom vibration using conditioning experiments. “People are rewarded when they are able to detect low amplitude vibrations, so they get better and better at responding,” Kaas says. That behavior may create an automatic behavior that increases nerve-brain connections and forms new pathways. William Barr, chief of neuropsychology at NYU School of Medicine, describes cell phones as virtual appendages, part of the “neuromatrix” of the body. “It's an interesting technological statement about society that our machines are becoming part of us,” he says. “If your cell phone is not there, you still feel like it is.”
The objective of a 2010 cross-sectional study by Rothberg et al of medical staff at an academic medical center was “to describe the P.”?Of 169 participants, 68 percent of cell phone users reported sometimes feeling the sensation of a vibrating cell phone when in fact the phone was not actually vibrating or not even being carried. Thirteen percent of the survey’s respondents reported feeling phantom cell phone vibrations at least once per day. A cell phone in a breast pocket was more likely to create phantom vibrations than on a belt clip.?
According to David Linden, a professor of neuroscience at the Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, phantom cell phone vibrations are the products of expectation based on prior individual experience and that “phantom cell phone vibration results from no stimulus at all and hence qualifies as a full-blown hallucination.”??He states that if the person was examined in the brain scanner, it’s likely they would show activation of the appropriate site in the body map of the primary somatosensory cortex.
The authors in Rothberg’s study write that “sensations are better characterized as tactile hallucinations, in which the brain perceives a sensation that is not actually present. Because the word hallucination carries a connotation of mental illness, whereas the phantom vibration syndrome appears to occur in a majority of normal individuals, and because so many are already using the term, it seems appropriate to let the popular appellation stand.”?These authors note that vibration syndrome may result from a misinterpretation of incoming sensory signals by the cerebral cortex. They note that, “In order to deal with the overwhelming amount of sensory input, the brain applies filters or schema based on what it expects to find, a process known as hypothesis guided search.”?In the case of phantom vibrations, the brain anticipates a call and misinterprets sensory input via this preconceived hypothesis. The sensory stimulus may include muscle contractions, pressure from clothing, or other sensory stimuli.
As Rothberg et al state, “Hallucinations are sometimes pathological, they often occur in normal individuals and are not limited to vibrations. Auditory hallucinations of cell phone ring tones also occur.” Given the high prevalence of phantom vibrations, the sensation points to normal brain mechanisms. Why do certain individuals experience phantom vibrations such as younger people and why are some body locations more susceptible??Rothberg et al suggest that younger minds exhibit increased neural plasticity and more imaginary vibrations. The Rothberg study reflects that urgency may have a certain role in the answer. Pager vibrations require urgent attention. Just as new mothers my consistently imagine hearing their baby’s monitor go off, certain people feel obligated to constantly check their phones and pagers.?The vibrations stimulate the brain’s creation of a sensory memory for that particular phone location and this continues when enforced.
Ultimately, phantom vibration reflects the way the human body ignores certain stimuli and fixates on others. Sensations are not just sensations; expectations, experiences, and psychological states all influence the threshold for signal detection. As a result, there is no quick fix. The best strategy would seem to be simply to disable vibrate mode and eliminate skin-phone contact, causing the skin-brain connections to diminish over time.?I suggested that tactic to Kevin. On follow-up, he reported fewer episodes of phantom vibration, but he still had occasional symptoms.?Perhaps the vibrations were an anticipatory signal now embedded in his nervous system—a persistent symptom of our deep dependency on our devices.
Phantom vibration leads one to explore this growing trend in hypervigilance.?In a recent Ofcom study the researchers found that the average person spends eight hours 21 minutes sleeping in a 24 hour period. But the average adult also clocks up an enormous eight hours 41 minutes actively connected to media or digital communication, indicating that many people spend more than half of their waking hours peering into an electronic device.?
How far does this high-tech hypervigilance go??
According to a new HuffPost/YouGov survey, sixty-three percent of smartphone users age 18-29 admitted to drifting to sleeping with a cell phone, smartphone or tablet in their bed. Why not substitute a significant other for a smartphone? Not only does it disrupt sleep, it leads to even more hypervigilance that can become addictive and disruptive.?Or has the intoxicating noise of the phone as it demands your attention become a siren that draws you and your hypervigilant ego to its illuminated shores, despite the danger it may hold??If you are tense and on high alert, it’s tough to get restful sleep: “Subconsciously, you’re expecting a call or text and this means your sleep will be lighter,” explains sleep expert Dr Neil Stanley.
In an article titled “Brain Drain: The Mere Presence of One’s Own Smartphone Reduces Available Cognitive Capacity,” Ward et al note that cellphones have enormous potential to improve life, “their persistent presence may come at a cognitive cost.”?The authors state that the mere presence of one’s own smartphone may occupy limited-capacity cognitive resources, thereby leaving fewer resources available for other tasks and undercutting cognitive performance.”?Ward confirmed an earlier study by Clayton et al but utilized different forms and periods of phone separation.
Have your ever missed a turn while driving while talking on your cell phone? In an article by Stothart et al “The attentional cost of receiving a cell phone notification,” the authors note that although mobile phones generate generally short duration auditory or tactile notifications to alert users of incoming calls and messages, “they can prompt task-irrelevant thoughts, or mind wandering, which has been shown to damage task performance.”
A second problem is the light a device emits.?
The light gives a “stay up” signal to your brain and disrupts your natural sleep cycle by overpowering the sleep-inducing hormone melatonin.?Make sure you switch off all electronic devices like phones or tablets at least an hour before bed to adjust to a more mellow mood.?A high-quality sleep mask can also help your brain produce melatonin to fall asleep. If you need more help, try Flux, a free app that makes your computer screen color resemble the current time of day and signal it is time for sleep.?Since you may you spend more time on your smartphone, laptop, or tablet than you spend sleeping, it may be a good time to set limits and ignore what appears to be a constant sense of phone etiquette, obligation, and fear of missing out.
In an April 24, 2019 NY Times article by Catherine Price entitled “Putting Down Your Phone May Help You Live Longer,” Price provides an overview of how cell phone use can increase levels of the stress-related hormone cortisol and threaten our long-term health.?Price writes that, “An increasing body of evidence suggests that the time we spend on our smartphones is interfering with our sleep, self-esteem, relationships, memory, attention spans, creativity, productivity and problem-solving and decision-making skills.”?Most previous discussions of the addictive effects of phones have focused on habit-forming brain chemical dopamine.?“Like slot machines, smartphones and apps are explicitly designed to trigger dopamine’s release, with the goal of making our devices difficult to put down,” Price wrote.?But Price notes that phone-induced increases in cortisol, our primary fight-or-flight hormone that rises with stress, are potentially even more alarming and threaten our long-term health.
As noted in Price’s article, “Your cortisol levels are elevated when your phone is in sight or nearby, or when you hear it or even think you hear it,” says David Greenfield, professor of clinical psychiatry at the University of Connecticut School of Medicine and founder of the Center for Internet and Technology Addiction. “It’s a stress response, and it feels unpleasant, and the body’s natural response is to want to check the phone to make the stress go away.”
Ward et al write that “One’s smartphone is more than just a phone, a camera, or a collection of apps. It is the one thing that connects everything—the hub of the connected world. The presence of one's smartphone enables on-demand access to information, entertainment, social stimulation, and more. However, our research suggests that these benefits—and the dependence they engender—may come at a cognitive cost.”
In addition to the treatments noted above, consider getting rid of all non-essential apps and notifications and taking a 24-hour digital Sabbath from all electronic devices.?Take a deep breath and relax.
In a world where many of us are trying to practice mindfulness, it is difficult to include a life filled with the urgency of our electronic devices.??Being in the moment is defined by a natural focus. As one of my yoga teachers asks, “What does stillness feel and sound like?”?Electronic devices often interrupt the flow with sometimes unnecessary and low-priority alerts.?Consider using your best brain sans electronics to avoid being mentally flooded.??
References
www.nytimes.com/2019/04/24/well/mind/putting-down-your-phone-may-help-you-live-longer.html
领英推荐
Deb, Amrita (2015), “Phantom Vibration and Phantom Ringing among Mobile Phone Users: A Systematic Review of Literature,” Asia-Pacific Psychiatry, 7 (3), 231–39.
Drouin, Michelle, Daren H. Kaiser, and Daniel A. Miller (2012), “Phantom Vibrations among Undergraduates: Prevalence and Associated Psychological Characteristics,” Computers in Human Behavior, 28 (4), 1490–96.
Pew Research Center (2015), “U.S. Smartphone Use in 2015,” Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC.
——— (2016), “Smartphone Ownership and Internet Usage Continues to Climb in Emerging Economies,” Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
——— (2017), “Mobile Fact Sheet, January 12, 2017,” Report, Pew Research Center, Washington, DC. Google Scholar
Radwanick, Sarah (2012), “Five Years Later: A Look Back at the Rise of the iPhone,” comScore, June 29.
Roye, Anja, Thomas Jacobsen, and Erich Schr?ger (2007), “Personal Significance Is Encoded Automatically by the Human Brain: An Event-Related Potential Study with Ringtones,” European Journal of Neuroscience, 26 (3), 784–90.
Strayer, David L., and William A. Johnston (2001), “Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone,” Psychological Science, 12 (6), 462–66.
Sciandra, Michael, and Jeffrey Inman (2016), “Digital Distraction: Consumer Mobile Device Use and Decision Making,” https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers2.cfm?abstract_id=2439202. Google Scholar
Stothart, Cary, Ainsley Mitchum, and Courtney Yehnert (2015), “The Attentional Cost of Receiving a Cell Phone Notification,” Journal of Experimental Psychology: Human Perception and Performance, 41 (4), 893–97. Crossref, Google Scholar
Strayer, David L., and William A. Johnston (2001), “Driven to Distraction: Dual-Task Studies of Simulated Driving and Conversing on a Cellular Telephone,” Psychological Science, 12 (6), 462–66. Crossref, Google Scholar
Sullivan, Andrew (2016), “I Used to Be a Human Being,” New York Magazine, September. Google Scholar
Thomas, Daniel (2016), “Digitally Weary Users Switch to ‘Dumb’ Phones,” Financial Times, February 21.
Thornton, Bill, Alyson Faires, Maija Robbins, and Eric Rollins (2014), “The Mere Presence of a Cell Phone May Be Distracting: Implications for Attention and Task Performance,” Social Psychology, 45 (6), 479–88.
?