SBA’s Inspector General Urges SBA To Verify Small Business Status of Certification Applicants
Steven Koprince
Federal Government Contracts Educator | Federal Government Contracts Speaker, Blogger & Author | Small Business Advocate | Tribal Business Board Member | Nonprofit Board Member & Volunteer
The SBA’s Office of Inspector General is doubling down on advice it has previously given the SBA: verify that companies applying for an SBA certification (that is, 8(a), WOSB/EDWOSB, VOSB/SDVOSB or HUBZone) are small businesses. In a recent report, the SBA OIG says that the SBA’s practice of accepting self-certifications of small business status in connection with certification applications “sets up a system that enables ineligible businesses and unscrupulous business owners to obtain funds for which they are not entitled.”
Perhaps you’re thinking, “wait a second--I thought all these SBA programs now required formal certifications! Didn’t the SBA do away with self-certification for WOSBs/EDWOSBs and VOSBs/SDVOSBs?"
If this thought crossed your mind, you’re absolutely right. All of the SBA’s major socioeconomic contracting programs now require formal certifications. However, when it processes these certifications, the SBA generally accepts the applicant’s word that it meets a key requirement for each certification: that is, that the applicant is a small business.
For example, if a company submits an application for certification as an SDVOSB, the SBA will carefully review a variety of documentation, to verify whether the applicant is at least 51% unconditionally owned by service-disabled veterans, as required by 13 C.F.R. 128.202, and controlled by service-disabled veterans, as called for by 13 C.F.R. 128.203. However, the SBA generally accepts the applicant’s word—as represented by its self-certification in SAM—that it meets the requirement set forth in 13 C.F.R. 128.200 that the applicant be “[a] small business concern . . . under the size standard corresponding to any NAICS code listed in its SAM profile.”
The SBA OIG objects to the SBA’s longstanding practice of accepting an applicant’s small business self-certification in connection with an application for a socioeconomic certification. In its recent report, the SBA OIG says that “we continue to believe Congress intended for SBA to certify these businesses eligibility for set-aside contracts.” As I noted at the outset, the SBA OIG says that accepting small business self-certification opens the door to fraud and abuse within the SBA’s socioeconomic certification programs.
The recent report isn’t the first time that the SBA OIG has raised this concern. In 2022, the SBA OIG raised this issue in a report on the SBA’s implementation of WOSB certification. And earlier this year, the SBA OIG raised similar concerns in a report on the SBA’s administration of the HUBZone Program.
Despite the SBA OIG’s repeated concerns, it does not appear that change is imminent. The SBA rejects the SBA OIG’s position and believes that accepting SAM representations is the correct approach. In an official response to the 2022 WOSB report, the SBA said, in part:
领英推荐
As SBA has informed the OIG on this and past audits, the size program is by statute and regulation a self-certification program, and therefore the appropriate verification is for procurement officials, whether SBA, contracting officers, or others, to verify the certification in SAM.gov (previously CCR and ORCA). Requiring extra documentation to support self-certification means the program is no longer a self-certification program. This substantial change, transforming a self-certification program into government reviewed verification/certification program, would require regulatory and possibly statutory changes.
The SBA disagrees that Congress intended the SBA to verify small business status in connection with socioeconomic certification applications. The SBA also explains that, in its view, imposing such a requirement would make certification applications more burdensome for applicants. Per the SBA, were small business size status to be evaluated as a component of each application, the applicant would be required to submit additional documentation and the time to process each application would lengthen. The SBA also notes that, in cases where the SBA becomes aware of information that could call an applicant’s small business status into question, the SBA may refer the company to SBA’s size specialists for a formal small business size determination.
Unless the SBA or the SBA OIG has a change of heart, it appears that the matter will remain at a stalemate—unless, Congress decides to intervene and insist that the SBA implement a formal size verification process in connection with applications to the SBA’s socioeconomic certification programs. I’ll keep my eyes peeled for any hints that Congress may be considering such a step.
In the words of Kevin McCallister, are you thirsty for more? Subscribe to this newsletter for weekly(ish) government contracting insights, and join the 10,000+ professionals who follow me on LinkedIn for more frequent updates. I promise: no tarantulas, tripwires or homemade blowtorches--just lots of federal contracting news and analysis, paired with occasional jokes of dubious quality.
Looking for in-depth coverage of key government contracting topics? Check out my on-demand courses available through Govology! And as a thank you for reading this newsletter, please use promo code 25KOP for a 25% discount!
Boring but important disclaimer: The information in this article is not, nor is it intended to be, legal advice. You should consult an attorney for individual advice regarding your own situation.
Director of Business Development & International Capture | Business Leader, DOD Grant Manager, Government, Program Manager, Senior Project Manager, Instructor, Turnaround Specialist, Senior Business Coach & Champion
1 个月Thank you Steven for your continued great work in keeping us informed. You always do a great job and when we hosted you, your updates were always informative and timely and helped us as Regional Managers and Director of PTACs and Apex' stay in "tune" with the changes. To that, I have helped hundreds if not thousands along with my staff, both SDBs, 8(a)s, and SDVOSB (VA and under the new program SBA), and although I believe it's very important for all the programs to have integrity, both in processes and awarding, this is "already" accomplished through the SBA size standards. Specifically, while registering or certifying your sam.gov annually, your annual revenues for the previous 12 will be entered in your sam.gov account, with the requirement of completing the (ORCA), or "FAR" questions for "self-certification", which "ensures" that no certification is issued to large business, based on the Primary NAICS codes', "size standard", whether based on revenues or personnel. In addition, for 8(a), and SDVOSB, the last three year taxes, "declaring" the revenues are required to be submitted, along with payroll (quick books), 1065, 1120, 1120s, or K1(Business taxes), which help to assess, verify and confirm eligibility for SB programs.
President, Ryzhka International, LLC
1 个月When my company got initially certified as a SDVOSB, the VA sent out someone to go audit my records, etc... to verify that I was indeed eligible. This is something I believe the SBA should be doing. Transferring the program to the SBA should not change the standard for verification.
Certified Grants Manager (GMCP)
1 个月Compliance monitoring is expensive, just as is updating training materials, etc. We all need to voice our support to our members of Congress to provide the oversight needed, but also provide the resources needed at SBA to do the jobs we demand of them.
Government Contracting Consultant at Land Of Opportunity Training
1 个月The world is getting smaller. Thanks for sharing! Interesting.
(Retired) Contract Officers Representative (COR) (Cybersecurity)(NH-III | DAWIA II CERTIFIED | CYBER 101 CERTIFIED I Management & Program Analyst at USTRANSCOM |COURT ADVOCATE | Military Spouse
1 个月Interesting! ??