Saving Retail
Geoffrey Moore
Author, speaker, advisor, best known for Crossing the Chasm, Zone to Win and The Infinite Staircase. Board Member of nLight, WorkFusion, and Phaidra. Chairman Emeritus Chasm Group & Chasm Institute.
Six-Sigma is Not Just for Supply Chains
Okay, so you know a sector is in trouble when there is a Web page in Wikipedia entitled “The Retail Apocalypse.” This post is not about how much trouble retail is in. This one is about how it can get out.
Let’s set the table first. In the past several decades enormous progress has been made on optimizing the supply chain, so much so indeed, that today supply is no longer the scarce ingredient in the economic equation. Instead it is demand—we have more goods than we can sell, and we are all competing for the new scarce ingredient—the customer.
In this new world, digital takes on a whole new meaning. It is no longer about taking cost out of the supply chain—done that. It is now about taking friction out of the delivery chain. That is, instead of applying six sigma thinking to cost-reduce its internal processes, now retailers and anyone else interfacing directly with consumers as customers should be applying it to their external facing processes. For retailers, this work needs to start with the retail transaction itself.
Look at Amazon as a case in point. You would have to grant they have a fabulous brand in retail—maybe the best ever—but here is the thing: They don’t do branding. Amazon’s brand has nothing to do with what it says. There is no ad campaign telling you how great it is to be an Amazon customer. Instead its brand is all about what it does. They don’t talk—they do.
Specifically, what they have done with relentless focus is apply the principles of six sigma to the retail transaction process. On the supply side, to be sure, they have radically improved price, availability, and selection—the three anchor principles of retail—but that is not where their true competitive advantage lies. Instead it lies in taking all the latency, all the wait time, all the registration effort, all the extra charges scrutiny—in short, all of the transaction costs out of the consumer transaction. They are not winning by providing a better experience—they are winning by providing a better un-experience.
It is scary how good they have gotten at this, but the fact remains, any retailer can make huge strides in this area if it is willing to make it the top priority. Just ask yourself—or apply data analytics to determining—what part of the transaction process you have in place today gives your consumers the most grief, and then ask, how could we reengineer the process to eliminate this cause? Six-sigma is not rocket science. What it does do is take a step by step approach to optimizing any system end to end. What it specifically does not do is transfer a transaction cost from one constituency to another. That doesn’t solve the problem, it just shifts the burden.
Sounds obvious until you realize we have been doing this sort of thing to our retail consumers for over a century. That’s because, up until quite recently, the end users of our goods and services were not the scarce ingredient and therefore could be expected to make their own way to and from our places of business, to accept whatever was on the shelf, to collect coupons offline to present at checkout, to wait in line for the privilege of buying our goods, to provide identification during that process if requested, and to transport their goods back home. Now ecommerce has changed all that. It doesn’t invalidate the value of brick and mortar retail; it just puts into high relief the many transaction costs involved.
Technology can help here, but only if it is applied with a six-sigma ethic. Take check-out for example. Self-checkout seemed like a good idea, but the way it has been introduced to date, it is not eliminating transaction costs, it is simply transferring them onto the consumer along with a new added cost of learning and adopting a new technology. What would be a better way to leverage technology? How about no check-out? That’s one of the many things Amazon is piloting. Could you? Sure, if you are willing to make reengineering the retail transaction experience your number one priority. Just remember it is what you do—not what could you say—that changes the game.
It is a daunting journey, but you can take heart from one thing. Consumers do not like to change brands. They do not like to change their point of sale retailers either. We are all creatures of habit, and when we find a path that works, we like to stay on it. So you don’t have to do anything spectacular to compete with Amazon. You already have the thing that they most want—namely, your existing base of customers. Right now they are still yours. You just have to be able keep them. And that means you have to keep up. If you show your customers that you are investing in their success—again, not through saying but through doing—they will stay loyal to you.
That’s what I think. What do you think?
______________________________________________________________________
Geoffrey Moore | Zone to Win | Geoffrey Moore Twitter | Geoffrey Moore YouTube
I'd apply a note of caution to "Consumers do not like to change brands." I'd argue that this is primarily because of the SEARCH costs of evaluating and testing a new brand, the travel time and latency, the pain of gathering helpful information, the trial & error of testing and scrutinizing. By making this Search process simpler and more effective, Amazon and other platforms create a whole new source of customer value: when Brands compete, you win.?
Medtech Market Development and Strategy Consulting
6 年These same ideas translate to today's Healthcare environment as well.? Minute clinics inside big box retailers, outpatient surgery centers, nurse and doctor call lines are all examples of improving access and improving how people experience healthcare delivery.? Great article with application well beyond retail.?
Very enlightening perspective: “they are winning by providing a better un-experience.” One might interpret (or misinterpret) the statement as “the experience isn’t important” however I don’t believe that’s what you mean at all. I interpret it as recognizing the “un-experience” perspective in the mix and how technology allows us to untangle aspects of the experience to un-experience buying journey that had previously been conflated into brick-and-mortar. Amazon has mastered the far end of the un-experience continuum. I wonder if that means that social media is where the experience side of the journey has moved (Pinterest comes to mind). It seems as if the un-experience/friction side of the equation was so ripe for disruption that Amazon was happy to not focus on anything else. They seem to be happy (for now) to let the social players do the social thing and don’t appear to be suffering for it.
Mortgage and Business Finance ??
7 年Insightful and on-point Geoffrey Moore. Though with supply chain and consumer friction costs already removed by globally scaled, consumer and payment focussed platforms as Amazon, Aliexpress and WeChat many suppliers to retail may simply follow the 80/20 rule, and focus their global reach through a few key direct to market platforms, regardless of effort from bricks 'n mortar 'catch-up'. However, experience retail will remain important for certain products, and removing friction will no doubt enhance the experience. Great work!