Save More Lives - Preserve the 5.9 GHz Spectrum
https://www.its.dot.gov/communications/image_gallery/image19.htm

Save More Lives - Preserve the 5.9 GHz Spectrum

Earlier this week, I was honored to participate in a roundtable discussion, hosted by the U.S. Department of Transportation (DOT), on the use of the 5.9 GHz spectrum for transportation safety.

To understand where we are today, it’s important to understand how we got here. In 1997, ITS America petitioned the Federal Communications Commission (FCC) to allocate the 5.9 GHz band for transportation safety critical communications. The FCC opened that band in 2004.

Those of us who work in transportation understand the value of preserving something for the future –it’s much easier to build something knowing it will be used for decades to come than to go back and try and build it once the environment has been altered. This was the same forethought put into creating the safety spectrum 20 years ago.

In 2013, GM was the first to use the safety spectrum by equipping the Cadillac CTS with Dedicated Short-Range Communications (DSRC) technology, which relied on the 5.9GHz band to allow vehicles to communicate with each other and the infrastructure. This technology has the potential to save lives, reduce crashes, increase mobility, and move toward a more sustainable transportation system. Vehicle- to-vehicle (V2V) communication has the potential to help drivers avoid or mitigate 70-80 percent of vehicle crashes involving unimpaired drivers. The idea was that GM’s announcement, along with regulatory certainty related to which V2X (Vehicle-to-Everything) technology should be used (DSRC or something else), would result in other automakers jumping on board.

Last spring, Toyota announced it would deploy DSRC across its entire U.S. fleet in 2021. And at last year’s ITS America Annual Meeting in Detroit, GM announced it would expand the technology to all Cadillacs as well as one of its crossover models.

Public agencies have also made significant investments in V2X technology in public infrastructure. You can look across the country and see that most states and dozens of cities have invested in connected vehicle technology.

The Colorado Department of Transportation, which I led for nearly four years, initially deployed DSRC on some of its roads. Now that technology is evolving, it’s using dual-technology roadside units (DSRC and cellular V2X, known as CV2X) on I-25 and I-70. Wyoming is under a blizzard watch as I’m writing, but truckers can move freight more safely across I-80 today because of this technology. Salt Lake City has used V2X to improve the reliability of its worst-performing transit line, from 85% to 93% on time. New York City has equipped 7,000 vehicles with devices that warn them that pedestrians are about to enter intersections.

Michigan, California, Florida, Pennsylvania, Utah – and the list goes on. This doesn’t happen overnight. Developing and then deploying these life-saving technologies takes time.

We are so close to achieving our vision of a better future transformed by intelligent mobility - a future in which cars don’t crash and people don’t spend 90 hours of their lives in traffic. This technology can alert vehicles not to enter an intersection because a distracted driver is about to blow through it at high speed, and it can allow ambulances and other emergency vehicles to arrive at hospitals with the extra minutes needed to save someone’s life.

 We are on the cusp of realizing this vision of a safer transportation system. At this critical juncture, it is the wrong time to allow regulatory uncertainty to force companies and agencies to pause deployments of V2X technologies. It is unacceptable to continue allowing 100 people to die every day on U.S. roadways when the technology exists to significantly reduce the number of lives lost and shattered.

Transportation professionals view this through the lense of safety and intelligent transportation.? This is not the FCC's language.? We need to speak the FCC's language - spectrum, Wifi, 5G, race with China on 5G, spectrum sharing, etc.? According to spectrum needs studies, the FCC simply does not need the 5.9 GHz spectrum to satisfy projected need for Wifi and 5G.? No one is telling that side of the story.??

回复
Piyush Jain

CEO and Founder, Simpalm & Ducknowl. Digital Transformation, Product Engineering, Tech-entrepreneur, Talent assessment.

5 年

Great idea Shailen, What if we can get data from each vehicle and analyze their driving behavior as well.

回复
Dave McNamara

Business Development for Connected Automation Vehicles. MTS LLC, Strategy and Execution for Automotive Electronics

5 年

The best answer to those who would rethink and revisit the landmark FCC decision is to deploy DSRC..that is to put life saving technology in the hands of "real people/users" (installed in cars/fleets). We have been slow to move from the roadside (installed RSUs) to equipped vehicles. We can start small put need to show we are advancing, ramping up Smart City/regional/corridor deployments to 1000s of vehicles.

Bj?rn E.

Intelligent Transport Systems - ITS

5 年

The European Union Commission (kind of like the US White House administration) passed the Delegated Act for C-ITS (called DSRC in the US) on March 13th this year. It passed in the European Union Parliament (same as the US House of Representatives) on April 17th after the Parliament’s own Committee on Transportation and Tourism, chaired by a member of The Green Parties, tried to stop it but failed to do so. The Council of the European Union (kind of like the US Senate) must decide if they want to vote against the bill by May 13th, and they are meeting tomorrow to discuss this. About 60% (some tricky rules here) must vote against it to stop it, and this is not likely to happen. This means that C-ITS/DSRC/802.11p/802.11ocd/5.9 GHz/ITS-G5 (many names, same thing) will gain a good foothold in EU legislation, preserving all the efforts and achievements from more than a decade of international cooperation across public sectors, national borders, and several industries.?

Mike McGurrin

Retired Transportation Consultant and Executive

5 年

Keeping this spectrum for direct Device to Device vehicular safety communications makes sense, regardless of whether the systems using the spectrum are DSRC or Cellular V2X. A series of poor decisions and pronouncements in the past delayed deployments for almost a decade, which is why the spectrum is now threatened. At this point, deployment must move forward quickly to have any chance of preserving the spectrum. How does the community make that happen? Long term, 5G D2D seems the likely approach, but putting deployments on hold for a few more years is not a good strategy for keeping the spectrum. Nor can anyone expect significant investments in DSRC deployments if they will be unusable in 5 years. What's the roadmap to keep deploying without wasting money while smoothly transitioning in the long term?

要查看或添加评论,请登录

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了