SAP TCO Icebergs On-prem vs. Cloud

SAP TCO Icebergs On-prem vs. Cloud

When comparing the Total Cost of Ownership (TCO) for SAP On-Premises versus Cloud solutions, the analysis typically revolves around several key factors. Below is a structured breakdown of the common understanding:

1. Cost Structure

  • On-Premises:
  • Cloud (e.g., SAP S/4HANA Cloud):

2. Key Cost Drivers

  • Implementation/Migration:
  • Staffing:
  • Upgrades and Innovation:
  • Downtime and Reliability:

3. Flexibility and Scalability

  • On-Prem: Less agile; scaling requires capital investment and time.
  • Cloud: Rapid scalability with pay-as-you-go models, ideal for fluctuating demand.

4. Hidden Costs

  • On-Prem: Hardware failures, energy inefficiencies, and unexpected upgrades.
  • Cloud: Data egress fees, premium support tiers, or overuse charges.

5. Customization and Control

  • On-Prem: Full control for deep customization, which may be critical for complex workflows.
  • Cloud: Standardized processes may reduce customization options, potentially requiring business process adaptations.

6. Compliance and Security

  • On-Prem: Full responsibility for compliance and security measures.
  • Cloud: Provider manages certifications (e.g., ISO, GDPR), though shared responsibility models apply.

7. Long-Term Projections

  • On-Prem: Higher initial costs but potentially lower long-term costs for stable, predictable workloads.
  • Cloud: Lower upfront costs with OpEx spreading expenses, often more cost-effective over 5–10 years due to reduced CapEx and outsourced management.

8. Industry Trends

  • Cloud Adoption: Favored by SMEs and enterprises seeking agility, with studies (e.g., SAP Insights, third-party analysts) often highlighting lower TCO.
  • On-Prem Viability: Preferred for highly regulated industries, legacy dependencies, or organizations with existing infrastructure.

Conclusion

The common understanding is that Cloud TCO is generally lower over time, driven by reduced CapEx, operational efficiency, and scalability. However, On-Prem may be preferable for organizations requiring full control, deep customization, or with existing infrastructure. The decision hinges on workload predictability, financial preferences (CapEx vs OpEx), regulatory needs, and strategic agility goals. Tools like SAP’s TCO calculators and third-party analyses (Gartner/Forrester) can provide tailored insights.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Tamas Laszip的更多文章

  • S/4HANA shift weakens Oracle

    S/4HANA shift weakens Oracle

    The mandatory shift to SAP S/4HANA (exclusively on SAP HANA by 2027) will disrupt the traditional database market for…

    1 条评论
  • Why S/4HANA is a Win-Win for Businesses and SAP

    Why S/4HANA is a Win-Win for Businesses and SAP

    The business software landscape is evolving rapidly, and SAP—the global leader in enterprise resource planning (ERP)—is…

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了