Santander will spend $20 Billion to digitize, and 14 other top Fintech developments
https://urban-aesthete.tumblr.com

Santander will spend $20 Billion to digitize, and 14 other top Fintech developments

Hi fellow futurists --

New layout, new content this week as I take the month of April to regroup for a new start in May. I am trying to simplify the delivery and help focus on what's most important, which feeds the Key Developments section below. Also, I want to be able to write a more in-depth treatment on one topic, rather than three intermediate-length entries. So for now, see the Thought Piece section, which will be more concept heavy and interlinked.

Let me know what you think about the new layout, and how to make it better! Which section should come first?

Thanks for reading, and see you next week,

Lex


Key Developments

No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image


Thought Piece: Entrepreneur View on Incumbent Digitization

Santander is in the news with a plan to spend EUR 20 billion on digitization and technology over the next four years. They are certainly not the first nor only incumbent to make the claim. JP Morgan famously spent $10 billion annually on tech over the last few years,  with companies like Goldman, Schwab, Nasdaq, BBVA and DBS making similarly proportioned commitments. The winners are slowly separating from the losers, as app stores of tech companies get stuffed with bank apps branded like the latest hipster offerings from Silicon Valley, or Eastern Europe, or China. And the backroom dealing is in full play too. Partnerships between the Haves on the financial product manufacturing side and the Haves on the tech consumer audience side (looking at you Apple card) are getting inked without any care about third party disruption.

No alt text provided for this image

I love entrepreneurship and the folks pioneering real discoveries. Those pioneers are rarely the ones that get to win the distribution or product-market fit game. But they do the work of showing the rest of us where the treasure is buried. It is easy to point out the repeating cycle, where incumbents adopt and “re-invent” the ideas that start-ups bring to the table. Take how Venmo was treated, before the banks copied it with Zelle. Or how roboadvisors were derided (nobody wants small accounts!) before every online broker launched or bought one. Or what Jamie Dimon said about Bitcoin, before rolling out JPM Coin. Or the premise that neobanks will never work in the US (Chime, meet Marcus), that chatbots are too simple (Finn.ai meet Erica), and so on ad infinitum. Incumbents in finance are the late mover, and when they move, they built up fortifications and starve competition.

So what should an entrepreneur do? Are the walls hopeless and impenetrable? I’ve spent the last few years trying to resolve this question for myself, to clarify what allows for some new entrants to win, relatively speaking, and forces others to wither. A few patterns have begun to emerge, which have been previously shared through Autonomous NEXT, and I plan to use this space to further explore open concepts. For one, incumbents have become much more acquisitive of Fintech companies, and are now more understanding of how such assets are built, priced, traded, and most importantly – integrated into the mothership. Valuations of 10x revenue may seem nuts for a Bank, but this is the bottom end for a valuation of a quickly growing, private company in the right secular space. Therefore, building a company for sale is not unreasonable. See below the increase bank-led acquisitions, though reluctantly, and a rough guide for revenue multiples by sector with some outdated (sorry!) European names.

No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image
No alt text provided for this image

For this more limited scope, the team usually looks like a deep operator from a particular business unit (e.g., cross border money movement, anti-money laundering, hedge fund infrastructure, risk management quants, alternative real estate investment, etc.) combined with a future thinking technologist. When pursuing this play, you need to have a Peter Thiel type “secret” about how the existing product machine works. Is it slow? Broken? Overcomplicated? Can a new product approach, whether through blockchain or artificial intelligence, make the thing better? If yes, the company should focus on getting to production and then manifesting the cost-advantage of the new machine in as loud way as possible. See OnDeck, Upstart, SigFig, AdvisorEngine, 11FS, Digital Asset and every other mixed enterprise play in the field. Scaled to the incumbent’s size, these cost savings can justify an exit worth the venture money.

Note that in the prior example, there is very little uncertainty about who the customer will be. We do the thing from before, just better. The other direction is to chase a blue ocean where the customer is undefined, unknown and sometimes unknowable. Being first in a growing ecosystem is the real dream, and can make for an enviable rocket ride. I would point to Stripe growing on the back of Uber, Plaid growing on the back of Venmo, Google growing on the back of the Internet, or the iPhone on peer-to-peer music. While in the moment, it can be hard to know if growth is real or imagined – and this fog is exactly where we are with crypto assets and their surrounding infrastructure, with mixed reality and its dearth of killer apps, with voice interfaces and a fear of ever-spying tech companies. Will these things expand and become worth the investment? Are you the first person covering finance on YouTube or Real Player?

It is the entrepreneur’s task to take the risk, and there is no shortage of people now willing to throw a brick through the window of Wall Street. But when you pick that brick up, feel its weight, and toss it back and forth between your palms, think about what you are really trying to accomplish. Whether you are a Fintech startup, a Crypto project, a Big Tech AI division, a Venture investor, an Asian chat app, or a Head of Innovation at an incumbent, try to see each other truthfully, and give credit to the hard work everyone is putting in moving the industry forward. There are cracks in the armor, but we exploit those to help people have a better financial future, not to kill competitors for a brief taste of cruel winning.

No alt text provided for this image


Looking for more?


Poul Holm

ICT (Delivery) Management

5 年

Everywhere in the world it is happening... but as the stats show: not in conservatively stuck Europe!

Edgardo Oliveras ??

Web Design | eCommerce | Digital Marketing | let's Connect

5 年

Technology IncWebmasters

Ka-ming Lim

Advisor, Co-founder and former CEO at MoneyFitt

5 年

Good summary of what’s happening, pithy comments welcome

A good summary about what's going on out there.?

Bruno Benevides

Data Scientist | Machine Learning | Python | SQL | Keras | Tensorflow | Poetry | Optuna

5 年

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Lex Sokolin的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了