Saliva Genome 2- Microbiome

Saliva Genome 2- Microbiome

As I mentioned in a previous post: https://www.dhirubhai.net/posts/jeffrosenfeld_saliva-whole-genome-post-1-i-just-got-my-activity-7170876117258616832-l_6q/

I got free saliva whole genome sequencing (WGS) from Psomagen on a Complete Genomics machine.? Since the DNA was collected from saliva, I was curious about how much non-human DNA would be in the samples as well as the amount of my microbiome that would be present.? The oral microbiome has been well studied, so there are lots of reference samples.

?

In order to analyze the microbiome, I reached out to my good friend (and AGBT - Advances in Genome Biology and Technology buddy) Manoj Dadlani who leads CosmosID .? Cosmos is a leader in microbiome and they provide a full suite of wet-lab and bioinformatics solutions to analyze all types of microbiome samples.? Manoj Dadlani generously gave me some free credits on the COSMOS ID platform that I used for analysis.? In addition, Britton Strickland, Ph.D. gave me some assistance on the analysis and interpretation.

?

In contrast to many other WGS providers, Psomagen allows for download of the full FASTQ and BAM files that were produced.? For my genome, there were 700 million reads providing over 30X coverage of the genome.?


As a first check, I looked at the standard FASTQC metrics:


These show uniformly high quality and testify to the Complete Genomics sequencing fidelity.?

?

I was curious whether there would be enough microbiome to analyze, but a quick look showed that I had 18M bacterial reads in my sample.? Britton confirmed that this is more than sufficient for a microbial analysis.


I started analysis at the strain level.? This view showed a massively complicated circular tree showing hundreds of strains.


This was obviously too high a level of detail and is difficult to interpret.? The strain-level information may be too fine grained. Secondly, our understanding of the oral microbiome at the strain level is incomplete, so no real conclusions could be drawn from this view.?

? Zooming out to genus level gave me a much more useful picture.? Most of my oral microbiome consists of Neisseria, Prevotella and Veillonella which are normal components of a healthy mouth and not anything of concern.?

?

When I looked at fungi, the top hit was Melampsora pinitorqua. This taxa has not been regularly seen in humans and it is a plant parasite.? Most commonly, it is found to cause pie twisting rust.

?I would have dismissed finding as being spurious noise, but it was supported by 800k reads.? Potentially, this Melampsora was present in my mouth from the local Orlando tap water. It would take some further investigation to determine if this is a real hit or something like when we found bottlenose dolphin DNA in the New York subway ( Christopher Mason )

?

In conclusion, the human WGS kit did a great job of profiling my microbiome.

?

Fortunately, nothing worryingly pathogenic was found.?Thank you again to Manoj Dadlani , Britton Strickland, Ph.D. and the whole CosmosID team.

?

Have you done an oral genome or microbiome?


What have you found that was useful or worrying?


For those that are curious, the CosmosID tool is based on their own k-mer based microbiome algorithms




?

Anna Beatriz Ferreira Ph.D.

Innovation Project Leader passionate about pharma and biotech | R&D, Project Management, Scientific Affairs, and Partnership Building

11 个月

Very nice test. I’ve been meaning to test my own samples as well.

回复
Jeffrey Rosenfeld, PhD, MBA ??

Genomics and Biomarkers Leader

11 个月

Thank you Manoj Dadlani and Britton Strickland, Ph.D. for the help

回复

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jeffrey Rosenfeld, PhD, MBA ??的更多文章

  • AGBT 2025 Sponsorship

    AGBT 2025 Sponsorship

    This year the AGBT - Advances in Genome Biology and Technology meeting will be returning to Marco Island! The meeting…

    3 条评论
  • Failed NIPT in women can signal an unknown cancer

    Failed NIPT in women can signal an unknown cancer

    Currently, Non-Invasive Prenatal Testing (NIPT) has become a standard test given to women at 9 weeks of gestation. This…

    12 条评论
  • Analysis of Abstracts at AGBT 2024

    Analysis of Abstracts at AGBT 2024

    In my post yesterday, I did an analysis of the sponsorship of AGBT. Sponsorship of the meeting is a major expense and…

    2 条评论
  • AGBT Sponsorship Statistics 2024

    AGBT Sponsorship Statistics 2024

    The AGBT meeting is almost here and that means it is time for me to do an analysis of the sponsorship of the meeting…

    22 条评论
  • Illumina Sequencing

    Illumina Sequencing

    At the ASHG meeting, one of the major topics of discussion was Illumina and their declining stock price. This is…

    2 条评论
  • Analysis of AGBT Abstracts for 2023

    Analysis of AGBT Abstracts for 2023

    Next week, the genomics community will return to Florida for the AGBT meeting. This year, we will be in a new location…

    1 条评论

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了