Safe Work Load or Working Load Limit
Hemal Modi
Structural engineer who works hard to translate your concept into something beyond a simple brick-and-mortar reality
According to AISC, forged steel structural hardware products, such as clevises, turnbuckles, eye nuts and sleeve nuts, are occasionally used in building design and construction. These products are generally forged according to ASTM A668 Class A requirements. ASTM A29, Grade 1035 material is commonly used in the manufacture of clevises and turnbuckles. ASTM A29, Grade 1030 material is commonly used in the manufacture of steel eye nuts and steel eye bolts. ASTM A29 Grade 1018 material is commonly used in the manufacture of sleeve nuts. Other products, such as steel rod ends, steel yoke ends and pins, cotter pins, and coupling nuts are commonly provided generically as “carbon steel.”
I am frequently asked whether we should compare LRFD or ASD load demand with "Safe Working Loads" (SWL) or "Working Load Limit" published by manufacturer's for clamps or hangers or other forged or manufactured products.
It is my understanding that manufacturer's provide?a safe working load that is based upon a factor of safety as high as 5, assuming that the product will be used in rigging or similar applications subject to dynamic loading. The factor of safety in the range of 3 (static usage) to 5 (life safety or dynamic usage) is usually applied to tested?proof load or minimum breaking load.?So the published catalog values might be overly conservative for permanent installations and similar applications subject to static loading only.?
If desired, the published safe work load (SWL) can be converted into an available strength with reliability consistent with that of other statically loaded structural materials. So, the nominal strength, Rn, is determined as:
Rn?= (safe working load) x (manufacturer’s safety factor)
领英推荐
Let's conservatively assume the factor of safety of 3, that is more common and the available strength, φRn?or Rn?/Ω, is determined using φ = 0.50 (LRFD) and Ω = 3.00 (ASD).
Ultimate strength level factored load demand, F_LRFD?< φRn?= 0.5*(3*SWL) = 1.5 SWL
Service level or allowable load demand, F_ASD?< Rn?/ Ω = (3*SWL) / 3 = 1.0 SWL?
Fun Fact: φ*Ω is almost always 1.5, as it is expected that?F_LRFD?= 1.5*F_ASD
It would be very conservative if you calculate the demand based on LRFD load combination and choose the product based on the published safe working load capacities in the catalogs, and a safe practice.
EH&S Hospital Project Inspector, QAQC Manager, Const. Inspector, Senior Super.-IV, Experienced In - Hospital/Healthcare Const., Industrial Const..
3 年Good comparisons and info.
Field Engineering | Construction Technology | Licensed Professional Engineer | Chartered Engineer
3 年Hemal Modi It is totally justifiable to use the FOS of 5 for the connections, especially while checking against dynamic loadings. What we learned during the Northridge earthquake of 94, that it is not the structural components that failed, but instead are the connections.