Russian Ships, Empty Wallets & Uganda's Revenge: How Shadow Wars, Climate Cash & Global South Innovation Are Flipping the World Order #234

Grüezi!?I’m Adrian Monck – welcome!

• ???? From Baltic Blackouts to Clean Energy: Europe's trying to fight Russian shadow wars while going green. Talk about multitasking from hell.
• ?? Hidden Cost of Climate Crisis: We've already spent tomorrow's innovation piggy bank - right when AI and hybrid warfare demand deep pockets
• ?? While NATO Plays Defence, Global South Goes Offence: Uganda's quietly revolutionising food tech while we're searching for Russian anchors in the Baltic

?1?? Low Tricks, Hybrid Conflicts

Grey Zone aggression – the new face of war is the professional foul.

If you ever wondered what the next war would look like, it looks a lot like something out of sport – the professional foul.

This is the rules-based order just out of sight of the referee.

The playing field for now? The Baltic, where two critical submarine cables connecting NATO allies have gone dark. A Russian-piloted cargo vessel, Yi Peng 3, was spotted making peculiar movements nearby. Nearby, Finnish nuclear reactors face mysterious shutdowns.

Each incident is designed to appear isolated, yet forms part of a coordinated campaign.

Security experts call it “death by a thousand cuts” – where the evil genius lies in exploiting the grey zone between peace and war through:

• Precision targeting of critical infrastructure
• Strategic timing of multiple system failures
• Legal ambiguity paralysing response options
• Weaponisation of civilian assets

What makes it different is both its simplicity and its sophistication.

As Thord Are Iversen notes:

“Using merchant ships dragging an anchor is a low cost, low tech, effective, and deniable method of sabotaging seafloor infrastructure.”

The combination of Russian hybrid warfare expertise with – potentially – Chinese maritime capabilities creates new challenges for Western security.

Welcome to the new face of conflict, where – as NATO’s Mark Rutte says – the front line is no longer a border – it’s the complex web of systems that underpin our modern societies.

#NationalSecurity #Geopolitics #HybridWarfare #NATO #CriticalInfrastructure

2?? How Democracies Fight Back: The Nordic-Baltic Blueprint

No head-butting. Just a bit less ‘Mr Nice Guy.’

The Nordic/Scandinavian response to hybrid warfare offers some lessons for democracies worldwide.

While Russian tactics aren’t new, their execution is evolving.

Recent incidents show a shift from isolated provocations to coordinated campaigns targeting:

• Maritime communications;
• Energy infrastructure;
• GPS and navigation systems;
• Public confidence.

The Nordic-Baltic countries have developed innovative countermeasures:

• Finland’s “creative” legal framework for seizing Russian assets;
• Estonia’s stepped up cyber resilience;
• Mechanisms for regional coordination;
• Strategic infrastructure protection.

These are some examples of how democracies can defend themselves without kicking over their values.

The challenge ahead though isn’t just protecting cables and reactors.

It’s about building resilient societies that can withstand hybrid pressure while preserving democratic principles.

#InternationalSecurity #HybridWarfare #NordicSecurity #NATO #CriticalInfrastructure

3?? From Shells to Solar – Can Guns Go Green?

Why the rush to rearm could modernise European industry.

Remember when Covid forced companies to transform overnight, making everything from ventilator machines to hand sanitiser?

Europe’s facing a similar industrial revolution right now, but twice over. It wants to re-arm, and it wants to go green.

• Europe needs to spend an extra €315 billion every year on military kit;
• At the same time, it has promised to spend €1 trillion a year on green tech;
• It’s like trying to build a car factory and a tank factory at the same time.

But guess what? The basics are the same:

• Both industries need modern, high-tech factories;
• Both need skilled workers and engineers;
• Both need secure supply chains;
• Both need massive investment in new equipment.

Instead of building two separate industrial systems, Europe could:

• Build modern, flexible factories;
• Train workers for both industries;
• Share research and development;
• Split the costs between defence and climate budgets.

Did someone say “joined up industrial policy”?

Don’t hold your breath.

It needs something that’s in short supply in Europe – political will.

#EuropeanIndustry #DefencePolicy #Manufacturing #GreenTransition

Sources: Bloomberg Intelligence Report on European Defense Spending, NATO Climate Change and Security Impact Assessment, EU Green Deal Documentation, European Commission Fiscal Framework Documents

4?? Climate Crisis Has a Hidden Cost We Don’t Talk About ???

We’ve already plundered the piggy bank.

Most climate change discussions focus on rising seas and extreme weather. But there’s a bigger economic threat lurking beneath the surface.

For 150 years, each generation’s technological progress doubled our wealth. This wasn’t just about getting richer – it was our societal safety net.

When automation disrupted jobs or industries transformed, we had the resources to help people adapt. But climate change is about to change all that.

The cost?

• At current warming (1.5°C): -0.5% GDP
• At 3°C: -2% GDP
• At 5°C: -12% GDP

Translation? The resources we’ve historically used to cushion economic disruption will be consumed by climate adaptation.

Think about it:

• Climate zones are shifting 5 kms/3 miles north every year;
• Infrastructure is becoming obsolete;
• Productive land is shrinking;
• Catastrophic risks are mounting.

The catch-22?

We need technological progress to adapt, but climate costs are consuming the very resources that fund innovation.

We could have addressed this for much less cash 30 years ago. Now we’re facing a much steeper bill – right when we need our economic cushion most.

#ClimateChange #Economics #Sustainability #Innovation #FutureOfWork #ClimateAction

5?? The Greatest Biz Lesson from History You’ve Never Heard!

Featuring old machinery, and underinvestment!

When America overtook Britain as the world’s largest economy in the 1890s, it wasn’t just a changing of the guard – it was an example of how innovation actually works.

And it demolishes most of what we think we know about business transformation.

Conventional wisdom tells us Britain fell behind because its business leaders were too conservative, its education system too underpowered, and its capital markets too focused on foreign investment.

Sound familiar? It’s the same criticism we hear about declining businesses today.

But here’s what really happened:

• British firms were actually making sophisticated, data-driven decisions.
• Their “outdated” textile machinery was 10% more productive than America’s newer tech.
• They were investing overseas because returns were demonstrably higher (5.7% vs 4.6% domestically).
• And their apprenticeship system was delivering exactly the skills their industries needed.

The real story?

America succeeded not because it had “better” business practices, but because it had unique advantages that made mass production profitable:

• Abundant raw materials;
• Scarce labour (driving automation);
• Massive domestic markets.

British companies couldn’t profitably copy American methods. Ford’s UK operation paid 50% more for steel than its US counterpart.

You can’t win at mass production when your inputs cost more and your markets are smaller.

The lesson for today’s business leaders? Innovation isn’t about blindly adopting “best practices.” It’s about understanding your specific circumstances and optimising for them.

#BusinessStrategy #Innovation #Leadership #EconomicHistory #BusinessTransformation

6?? The AI Race’s Hidden Inflection Point

Why Technical Dominance Won’t Determine the Winner

Diminishing returns in AI scaling could reshape global tech competition.

Conventional wisdom says that whoever leads in AI model development wins the global race for AI supremacy.

But evidence is piling up to suggest this assumption is wrong.

• AI labs report diminishing returns from scaling up compute power and data volume for next-gen models.
• Chinese companies filed 38,000+ genAI patents (2014-2023) vs US total of 6,276.
• UAE and Saudi Arabia have emerged as pivotal players.
• The Netherlands and Japan align with US chip export controls, but reluctantly;
• China responds with rare earth metal export controls and renewed foreign talent recruitment.

This raises three problems for the US:

1. Chip restrictions become less effective As AI labs hit diminishing returns on larger models, the strategic value of advanced chips declines proportionally. US export controls targeting China’s access to cutting-edge semiconductors may become less effective over time.
2. Chinese implementation might beat US innovation While US firms lead in basic research breakthroughs, China’s focus on rapid commercial deployment and optimisation could provide advantages in the applications layer – where real-world value is ultimately created.
3. Unhappy allies US efforts to restrict China’s AI development through export controls risk alienating key allies whose cooperation is essential for long-term technological leadership.

#AIStrategy #TechCompetition #GlobalInnovation #MiddleEastTech

Sources: The Information, Reuters, Bloomberg, Middle East Institute, The New York Times

7?? What Dubai’s Awards Say About Global Tech Development

The Global South is quietly reshaping innovation.

While Silicon Valley debates AI ethics and quantum supremacy, a different technological revolution is unfolding across emerging economies.

The Dubai Future Solutions/Prototypes for Humanity awards show that breakthrough innovations are increasingly emerging from unexpected corners of the global academy.

The awards pulled together:

• 2,700 projects from 800+ universities across 100+ countries
• 90% of world's top universities participated
• 3 of 5 winning innovations address fundamental survival challenges
• 2 winning projects from Global South institutions
• $100k USD total prize fund democratising research access

Consider Uganda Christian University’s Freza Nanotech. Their biodegradable preservation solution tackles post-harvest losses – a critical issue affecting millions of smallholder farmers. It extends produce shelf life to 60 days without refrigeration, potentially transforming agricultural economics across developing regions. This isn’t innovation for innovation’s sake; it’s survival technology with immediate real-world impact.

IIT Delhi’s plasma wastewater treatment system is a leap forward in addressing water contamination – a pressing concern in rapidly urbanising nations. Operating at just 50°C, it achieves what traditional systems cannot: complete degradation of pharmaceutical and pesticide contaminants while generating hydrogen as a bonus.

These stand alongside traditional innovation winners like Stanford and ETH Zurich.

Just as Japan’s post-war focus on practical innovation led to its technological renaissance, we’re witnessing a similar pattern across the Global South.

These aren’t mere adaptations of Western technology but fundamental innovations born from local challenges. Tomorrow’s breakthrough technologies may well emerge from universities far from traditional tech hubs, driven not by market opportunity but by existential necessity.

If you want to stay ahead – broaden your innovation radar.

#GlobalInnovation #EmergingTech #SustainableSolutions #TechForGood

If you enjoy this newsletter – please recommend it!

Best,

Adrian