The Rules of Promoting a "Work from House"?Mindset
Clay Griffith
Senior Director, Solutions and Partnerships @ Wizeline | Market-Facing Offerings
“Love and work — work and love — that’s all there is.”?
With that simple idea a century ago, Freud offered us a somewhat prophetic view of what he saw as the cornerstones of the human experience. The family, friends, and relationships that we form in life plus our various forms of work.?
That’s it. This — to Freud — makes us us.
This idea is pretty nicely aligned to the way we think about Work Life Balance (WLB). As long as we can find that happy place between work and all of the rest of life, things should be fine. We’ll be happy. “That’s all there is.”
But Work from Home (WFH) really blurs the lines of WLB.
It’s not work from house, it’s home.?
More than just any place, so many of us are now working from where the love part of our life happens. As lines blur, those “cornerstones” of the human experience might get a little too close for comfort.
What’s happening in that tightening space of full time WFH life is interesting.
Employee burnout is at a fever pitch . Anxiety at work, job scopes expanding, clarity decreasing, immature WFH culture , hours getting stretched… all of this plays a part.?
Stress, and how we’re dealing with that stress, is becoming a theme .
One in four(ish) of us wants to quit our job right now. That might include you. Salaries, of course, are a factor (economic stress) but the big culprit is simple unhappiness with things-as-they-are.?
Our new normal, apparently, is still a little shaky as we find our feet.
To do that, companies are investing big time into benefits and programs to fight back against the Big Quit’s tide.?
Wellness benefits (services like telemedicine, counseling, meditation apps, etc.) and flexible work hours are the biggest weapons in the fight .?
The thinking here is straightforward:?
Show we care about wellness (employees respond well to this) and make some room for at-home commitments like family and other distractions.
But looking at the outcomes, are we really solving the right thing?
Not all WFH is created?equal
The data shows that most people prefer remote options when job hunting. People like remote.?
This is especially true for Millenials, Gen Z, and the younger Gen-Xers who collectively make up the majority of that WFH workforce. WFHers tend to be more optimistic and satisfied with their careers in general too.?
And, yet, compared to their on-site peers, these same groups are also 2X as likely to be unhappy with their job and highly stressed out. Burnout in the WFH group is higher than hybrid and in-office peers, but people like remote working over all.?
What gives?
See the actual source material for the ‘more optimistic’ study linked above. Indeed, optimism is high but WFHers aren’t all that happy with their overall WLB and performance is suffering.
In other words, enjoying the idea of WFH may not equal happiness with how it’s being done today. Here’s how ADP Research put it:
“While workers are surprisingly upbeat surrounding job satisfaction and outlook for the next five years, stress at work has reached critical levels, [exacerbated] by a trend that was already in motion prior to the pandemic. The impact on workers professionally, as well as personally, is profound and employers have taken?notice”
Workers want this New Normal but they want it built-to-order, crafted and structured with today’s context in mind. Not yesterday’s context.?
Many companies that aren’t WFH-native are solving for a ‘New Normal’ that may be better named the ‘new-place-you-work-and-we-guess-youre-still-stressed-over-covid’.?
They haven’t changed the fundamentals of how they operate to really work for a WFH world. That’s wrecked WLB for their teams and fueled the burnout crisis we see today.
This is the real problem to be solved.?
To get WLB right, we need to look at what’s happening in our heads ??.
Our many selves and what it means to?balance
Obviously, WLB is a pretty diluted way to see things. We don’t just “balance” work and all of the rest of life.?
We have relationships, hobbies, spirituality, our physical health, experiences, causes we care about, family, learning, community, R&R, dumb little passions and so much more.?
Run through Maslow’s hierarchy and you have an effective framing for how we spend our time. We have many things.
Contemporary psychology gives us a few concepts that highlight just how critical this grab-bag of ‘things’ might be when it comes to how we inevitably feel.?
As it turns out, higher self complexity not only impacts how we view ourselves, it’s directly tied to how we evaluate and manage stress .?
Complexity promotes self esteem by providing a more holistic, less vulnerable, total self image. We like to be made of many things and we like those things to be different from one-another. Variety, after all, is the spice of life.?
WFH puts up an obvious challenge to this. The hats are looking too similar.
This is all bad news for our identities and stress-coping mechanisms. Severance seems to really matter.
Back in the 80’s, Claude Steele kicked off the whole — sometimes misinterpreted — Self Affirmation movement with his research on the complex self and how we handle stressful moments.?
Steele showed that we effectively alleviate our stress response to high-pressure situations by bringing awareness (“I AM A GOOD PERSON”) to various parts of our lives. Parts, importantly, that aren’t related to the immediate stress that we’re experiencing.?
For those of us more naturally balanced in our lifestyles, this kind of stress management (and performance) comes easily. The more dynamic we are, the more qualities and self-beliefs we can call on to mitigate stress and motivate behavior.?
When it comes to jobs, maybe it’d be better to say Work Life Ratio, instead of Balance. At some point, too much work in the mix kills the outcomes.?
When organizations begin to understand this and embrace the whole individual , the outcomes look measurably better.
It’s exactly what many organizations are getting wrong today.?
Getting it right requires a fundamental shift in the way employees are engaged, enabled, and managed in their work. Get those cost-savings and productivity boosts of a strong WFH team without burnout and attrition inevitably sparking the opposite.?
Okay, yeah, but how?
领英推荐
A three pronged approach for getting WFH?right
Some of you were already thinking this, but stating the obvious:?
It is entirely possible to do this WFH thing well. Plenty of people W’d-FH successfully, happily, and resiliently long before Covid 19. They still do.
Remote life champion, Tim Ferriss , showed that we could get more done in a remote world and thrive because of it. His seminal 4 Hour Work Week, published way back in 2007, inspired a whole generation of remote workers by focusing squarely on the separation of powers that we’re talking about here.
Hundreds (thousands?) of companies were — and are still — getting it right as well. So why isn’t WFH working for so many?
Inevitably, it comes down to culture.?
Organizations that get this right were mostly built with WFH as part of the model — it’s in their DNA. Everything from operations to the talent they hired was done with this in mind.?
It’s difficult to just switch this kind of culture on when it was never there pre-Covid-19. This is especially true now that managers are debating what comes next, and if WFH will even last. Buy-in matters.?
Here’s a framework that might push better outcomes:
Most companies today are doing a great job at #3 and failing at the rest. Let’s dig into each to explain more.
Starting from the?Simplest
#3: Try to resolve intrinsic stress
No doubt, helping teams to offset the built-in stresses of WFH is a big deal in 2022.?
Wellness apps and services are still the #1 top trending employee benefit category and employees do generally appreciate these things.?
Breath in, breath out.?
It’s a little too easy, isn’t it?
It sure would be unfortunate if employees aren’t actually using these services ...?
When fighting back against burnout, we have to be careful about how prominent these services are in our whole plan of attack.?
Naturally, this category got a ton of interest in 2020 when the general societal stress levels were existential. Companies, smartly, put benefit package focus on these services because there was little else to do.?
It wasn’t WFH and corporate culture causing the stress — it was just Covid.?
But (hot take) people don’t much worry about Covid-19 anymore .?
The peak stress that we’re dealing with now is more that awkward phase of our new normal. That’s the source.
It’s great to keep offering these benefits, especially in that awkward phase, and they’re a good sign of the company’s interest in wellness . Just be smart about it. These apps and services are nothing more than a bandaid on their own. Ask if they’re working, know how that’s measured, and invest in what shows results.?
#2: Optimize for WFH performance
The key to this category is to look at it as optimization, not allowance.
Optimization is not only about making WFH more comfortable for people. It’s about implementing structures that are fit for modern working and enable people to do more for the company.?
Remember, this is all about optimizing for performance. Center on data, have clear and attainable goals, and involve team members in this ongoing process.?
#1: Pursue a WFH native?culture
There’s a common, often misunderstood trope in our WFH era to ‘bring your entire self’ to work.?Being 100% authentic is great, but nobody needs to bring their entire life into work.
Many of the companies getting this right today were culturally built for WFH pre-Covid. They understand the boundaries required to realize the benefits.
Zooming out
The language that we’ve been using this year to talk about the job market is interesting. The Great Resignation , The Big Quit , The Great Reshuffle .?
As we’ve discussed here, maybe those phrases place the blame on the wrong party. Is it the talent resigning or the current WFH arrangement that we need to tackle??
Let’s just call it ‘The Great Growing Pain’. Something that we’re, still, all in together.
Getting a little bit more ‘Work from House’ in our thinking can do wonders. Setting boundaries that embrace the whole individual, heightened trust coupled with accountability, and open dialogue all support the long-term health and productivity of a remote workforce.?
Many organizations are doing well here already. My own organization, Cognizant, is one of these. Remote work was built into our model many years before 2020 — simply due to the nature of our business — and our culture, tools, and processes underpin our effectiveness here.?
But even we are always improving.?
The last few years have highlighted so many opportunities while also changing some fundamentals of what people need *and want* to do their best work — so we’ve changed with them.?
Continuous improvement matters, WFH and everywhere else. Be careful with any absolutist guidance on getting this perfectly and forever right. Just listen and learn.?
We’ve discovered a lot about ourselves and each other these past few years. Business goals have evolved and amplified but so have our own. As we get more into tune with what really matters, supporting WLB becomes more than an employee benefit — it’s performance management.?
Connect those business goals to the employee's goals and watch the results.
P.S. The stuff here about Self Concept, variety in lifestyle, and performance optimization is a passion of mine. I'm building some things for practicing "Selfness" after years of combatting (and mostly beating) bouts of high generalized anxiety and self-doubt spawned by comically poor lifestyle balance. Selfness is an action-oriented, decisive approach to wellness that impacts how you live. If interested in keeping up with that, consider the follow button.