Is RPA the first step towards SkyNet?

Is RPA the first step towards SkyNet?

Robotic Process Automation (RPA) is one of the world fastest growing technologies and the realisation that businesses can save time and money on repetitive manual tasks is why it is quickly becoming a hot topic. The technology is gaining traction as a cost-effective alternative to traditional systems integration and is projected to become a $5 billion market globally by 2020, with a CAGR of over 60 percent.

Almost every industry is adopting the technology and although it is in its infancy across the UK and Europe there are a number of organisations who were early adopters that are reaping the benefits already. Millions and millions of Pounds, Euros, Dollars etc have already been saved. A study of an organisation within London’s insurance market showed that data which previously took two days to process, took only 30 minutes using RPA and the largest amount of robots hosted by a company was about 500 in 2015. This number has almost reached 2000 robots in 2016. 2017 will see even larger projects!

Employees have questioned whether their jobs are at risk due to being replaced by robots however most companies are reassuring that it will free up their time to focus on more business-critical tasks. However, according to Forrester by 2021, robots will have eliminated 6% of all jobs in the US, starting with customer service representatives and eventually truck and taxi drivers. This is just a report from the US and does not take into account the UK and Europe but I’m sure it is a similar percentage on this side of the pond.

I don’t think we have to worry about robots taking over the world or all of our jobs for that matter but I feel that having them complete the tedious repetitive tasks will allow employees to have slightly different job roles where they can learn new skills, free up time to focus on more important tasks and develop their careers in a slightly different direction. To integrate RPA systems effectively, they must be guided by human intelligence. The possibilities for any type of automation or robot are set by human will and imagination – something which AI is a long way off replicating – ensuring humans remain in control of the workplace. Contrary to today’s worst fears, robotics could enable the rise, not the demise, of the human “knowledge worker”, but managers need to prepare their staff for the unavoidable changes to their current jobs, enabling them to upskill, specialise and re-train where necessary.

I would be interested to hear your thoughts on RPA, the market, if you have been affected by it in your current job (good or bad) and how you see it progressing in 2017 and over the coming years.

Lal Krishna

Chairman: CDC Group of Companies at Ciber Digita Consultants (CDC)

8 年

Harrison Goode, Nice article! This tech was in existence throughout our careers. The basic screen scraping, and macros and key board mouse click recording were all there…even decades ago, we all had fun doing it. Now suddenly why this hype and scream of an impending doom on Skynet taking over. Well…someone…maybe, Skynet, thought of adding this prefix ‘Robotic’ to the vanilla process automation, transforming it into an out of the world technology. In early 90s I practically saw how Skynet took over by introducing PC into the mud stained hands of our farmers and transformed that bullock cart economy to the top economies of the world today. Now RPA and the allied technologies certainly will make a huge impact…but not the kind of impact I saw in the 90s. It will streamline the processes…and make it much efficient allowing the introduction of newer services and complexities, which mean more jobs. The only challenge is people. People should be willing to embrace change, update their competencies and be agile. If not you will go in obscurity the way the old telephone switch board operators went. Transform yourself and become the Skynet Capt. Lal CDCLLP.com

Francis Carden

Analysis.Tech | Analyst | CEO, Founder, Automation Den | Keynote Speaker | Thought Leader | LOWCODE | NOCODE | GenAi | Godfather of RPA | Inventor of Neuronomous| UX Guru | Investor | Podcaster

8 年

Hello, reality check. 1. RPA is not new. How can it be in it's infancy when most of the vendors are 10+ years old? As I've said before, the term "new" and "infancy" is a disguise by some vendors for the number of failed RPA projects at real scale. (See other threads from well established thought leaders). It's not a $5billion market for RPA alone in 3 years, that's just madness, it's a $5bn market when combined with all sorts of other transformation, automation, AI etc., and it will be a lot bigger than that. 2. The largest Robotic deployment I know of was implemented in 2006, at a Telco and got to as many as 30,000 bots, deployed across multiple BPO's for a large Telco. Still in production today! This is RPA attended. A year later we installed 20,000 bots in a PC manufacture. My first know sold RPA unattended was to a UK bank in 2007. Likely not the first, but certainly not "new". 3. Whilst it matters in attended (scale), it doesn't really matter how many "bots" there are deployed in RPA un-attended. If they are slow bots, and/or have been deployed inefficiently, you could have more for the wrong reasons.. More does not equal better. One customer replaced another RPA vendors with significantly less bots because they were much much faster (thus benchmarking needs to be part of pilot). Surely what matters is how many bots you have deployed successfully, at what cost (including Opex) and with what ROI (FTE savings, error rates, improved CX or reduced regulatory violations). Skynet was about machines becoming so intelligent, they could make more intelligent machines and take-over the world!! RPA is almost the opposite since most bots are doing mostly just rote rules based work that is likely already ear-marked for replacement, re-engineering or transformation. Keeping an old legacy system that can't easily transform a legacy company into a digital company is going to end up being a self-destruct button in years to come. You cannot compete without real change. Also, it is NOT a cost effective alternative to enterprise integration. It is a collaborator to successful enterprise integration, a stop-gap, an insurance policy, a bridge or faster time to value. So, whilst i enjoy hype as much as the next person, if we do not set customer expectations correctly, all we are going to do is create a near-term community of "I won't touch RPA with a barge pole" response. This response in fact, is what killed "screen scraping" as a response to "swivel chair integration". The technology did not so much kill screen scraping as much as the concern from IT that extending the life of tired systems was not viable long term.

Dan B.

Operational Excellence Coach at Willis Towers Watson

8 年

The possibilities are profound. I wonder how a robotic Britain might contrast with a robotic North Korea in 50 years?

Rod Clemmons

Flightscope Club Fitting - Custom Clubs - Repairs - Lessons

8 年

ROA is very effective at frustrating consumer/user complaints and support requests. This is taking jobs away from deserving call center workers in New Deli.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Harrison Goode的更多文章

社区洞察

其他会员也浏览了