Roles belong to the system, not to the individuals who inhabit it.

Roles belong to the system, not to the individuals who inhabit it.

Morning Lessons on Leadership from a 5km Run

During a 5km morning run with trainees at the Home Team Academy, I witnessed a fundamental principle of Relational Systems Intelligence (RSI):

"Relationship systems rely on roles for organisation and execution of functions. Roles belong to the system, not to individuals."

This principle came to life in a way I hadn’t quite appreciated before.

The Role of the Cheerleader

As we began the run, the IC (in-charge) led the group with energy, singing songs to lift the cohort's spirits. He wasn't just performing his formal, outer role as IC—he had taken on the inner role of a cheerleader, addressing the group's social needs.

Midway through, as the IC grew tired and stopped leading, the group fell silent, and the energy dropped. After a moment, a female trainee stepped up and began leading the songs. The mood shifted, the rhythm was restored, and the system naturally adapted to meet its needs.

The system we were part of demonstrated its intelligence and generative nature. When one role was vacated, someone else stepped in, not by instruction but by recognising and responding to the group’s needs.

Leadership Beyond Formal Roles

This simple experience revealed a powerful truth about leadership. Leaders may hold formal roles, but that doesn’t mean they always need to lead. By recognising the system as intelligent and adaptive, we can learn when to lead and when to step back.

Roles don’t belong to individuals—they belong to the system. This realisation encourages a dynamic and responsive leadership style, where the focus shifts from control to collaboration.

Lessons for Leaders

Here are some key takeaways I reflected on after the run:

1. Roles Belong to the System

  • Roles aren’t fixed to individuals. Anyone in the team can step into a role when needed.
  • Flexible and adaptive leadership enables teams to respond more effectively to challenges and opportunities.

2. Focus on the System, Not Individuals

  • How can I shift my focus from personal accomplishments to the overall health of the system?
  • We can reduce competition and build cohesion by fostering a culture where contributions benefit the team.

3. Prioritise Roles, Not Status

  • When forming teams, focus on the roles required to achieve the goal rather than individual capabilities or status.
  • This ensures that all essential functions are covered and allows for organic role shifts based on the team's evolving needs.

4. Cultivate Shared Leadership

  • Leadership isn’t a position. It’s a role anyone can assume.
  • Distributing leadership responsibilities across the team empowers individuals, builds accountability, and fosters ownership.

Final Thoughts

This run experience reinforced a valuable leadership principle: systems are intelligent and generative. They will inform us when to lead and when to step back. By trusting the system and focusing on its needs, we empower the team to thrive collectively.

Take what’s useful for you. Reflect on how you can lead with the system in mind.

Let’s create teams that aren’t just high-performing but deeply connected and responsive.

Please let me know what your thoughts are.

How do you see the roles within your system shaping its success?


RSI 5 Principles:

https://srinathramakrishnan.wordpress.com/2021/10/10/relationship-systems-intelligence-an-overview/

Sheu Sum Kok

Teach and advise on the best OD practices to Singapore public servants, agencies and ministries.

4 天前

Thanks for the distinction of internal and external roles. And that external roles are defined and belongs to the system. Sometimes there is a mismatch between internal and external roles; for example, the leader’s internal expectation of the external role is much larger that the system current needs. Or vice versa. The mismatch then is often a source of tension as we often see in #GRPI analysis. What gives? Sometimes we may consider shifting the system so as to shift the conditions of the roles. Other times, I see leaders shifting their internal expectations of their roles. The internal shifts remind me of #Bridgestransitions processes….

Cherielyn Leong

Organisation developer, change mentor and wellbeing advocate.

1 周

Thanks for this. This also applies to resource strapped teams with Directors having to juggle multiple teams at the same time. A small leadership vacuum can trigger generative responses as people try to cope with the vacuum and still meet targets and take care of well being.

Glen Tan

Transformation, Industry 4.0, Sustainability, Leadership, General Management & Board Membership

1 周

Love this

Sze Zhin (Zee) Lee

Sensemaking & Solutioning for Collective Behaviour Change | Leadership Development | Training & Facilitation

1 周

Appreciate the distinction made here between a IC title and the role the fulfills. We might give a person a title, but the role and it's accompanying contribution belongs to the system, and supports the system. Aaron Lee Yong Qing i think you'll resonate with this story and lesson ??

'Chuck' Chek Siang Ng, CESGA, IHRP-SP

Business Builder | Super Network in Asia | Evidence-based Leadership Journeys | Helping Solve C-suites' Most Crucial Organisational Challenges

1 周

Insightful, Jimmy Lee roles are not fixed and people rise to the occasion when offered the right balance of support and challenge - the very essence of great coaching.

要查看或添加评论,请登录

Jimmy Lee的更多文章