Role of systemic Team Coaching in Boardroom Development

?

1. Why Should You Use Coaching When Developing Boardroom Teams?

Coaching has emerged as a pivotal strategy for enhancing the effectiveness of boardroom teams, primarily due to its ability to foster individual and collective growth within an organizational context. The boardroom is a complex environment where diverse perspectives converge, necessitating a structured approach to facilitate collaboration and decision-making. Systemic team coaching, in particular, addresses the intricate dynamics of teams by considering both individual behaviors and the broader organizational system in which they operate. This holistic approach is essential for developing a cohesive team that can navigate challenges effectively and drive organizational success.

Research indicates that coaching can significantly enhance team performance by promoting mutual trust, psychological safety, and stakeholder engagement (Carter et al., 2023; , Terblanche & Heyns, 2020). These elements are crucial in a boardroom setting, where decisions often have far-reaching implications. By fostering an environment of trust and openness, coaching enables team members to express their ideas and concerns freely, leading to more innovative solutions and improved decision-making processes (Huynh et al., 2019). Furthermore, coaching can facilitate the co-creation of strategies that align with organizational goals, thereby enhancing the overall effectiveness of the boardroom team (Jowett et al., 2012).

?

2. Is Systemic Team Coaching the Best Suitable and Effective Option Available?

Systemic team coaching stands out as a particularly effective approach for boardroom development due to its comprehensive nature. Unlike traditional coaching methods that may focus solely on individual performance, systemic coaching emphasizes the interdependencies within the team and the external environment (Galey-Horn, 2020). This perspective allows for real-time application of strategies and insights, enabling teams to adapt to changing circumstances and challenges effectively.

The effectiveness of systemic coaching is supported by evidence that highlights its impact on team learning and development. For instance, studies have shown that systemic coaching fosters a culture of continuous improvement, where teams are encouraged to reflect on their practices and learn from their experiences (Zuberbühler et al., 2020). This iterative process not only enhances individual competencies but also strengthens the collective capability of the team, making it a robust option for boardroom development.

Moreover, systemic coaching aligns well with contemporary organizational needs, which often require agility and responsiveness. By integrating stakeholder perspectives and focusing on co-creation, systemic coaching ensures that boardroom teams are not only aligned internally but also responsive to external demands (Bastable et al., 2019). This adaptability is crucial in today's fast-paced business environment, making systemic coaching a highly suitable choice for boardroom teams.

?

3. Alternatives to Systemic Coaching

While systemic team coaching offers numerous advantages, it is essential to consider alternative approaches that may also contribute to boardroom development. One-on-one coaching is a common alternative, focusing on individual leaders' growth and performance. This method can be effective in addressing specific challenges faced by individual board members but may lack the holistic perspective that systemic coaching provides (Woo, 2017).

Facilitation and team workshops are another alternative, often employed to address specific issues or enhance team dynamics. These methods can foster collaboration and communication among team members; however, they may not delve deeply into the underlying systemic factors that influence team performance (Terblanche, 2022). Training programs, while beneficial for skill development, often do not address the real-time application of skills within the context of team dynamics, which is a critical component of systemic coaching (Min et al., 2015).

Additionally, mentoring can serve as a valuable alternative, particularly for developing leadership skills among board members. However, mentoring typically focuses on the transfer of knowledge and experience rather than the systemic dynamics of team interactions (McIntosh et al., 2018). Each of these alternatives has its strengths and weaknesses, but they may not fully capture the comprehensive and integrative approach that systemic coaching offers.

?

4. Pros and Cons of Systemic Team Coaching

Systemic team coaching presents several advantages that make it a compelling choice for boardroom development. One of the primary benefits is its focus on holistic development, which considers the interplay between individual and collective dynamics (Ben-Ahmed, 2020). This comprehensive approach fosters sustainable change, as it encourages teams to develop adaptive strategies that can be applied in real-time, enhancing their overall effectiveness (Haan et al., 2013).

Another significant advantage is the improvement in collaboration and stakeholder engagement that systemic coaching promotes. By involving all team members in the coaching process, systemic coaching cultivates a sense of ownership and accountability, leading to increased commitment to team goals (Woulfin, 2018). Furthermore, the emphasis on psychological safety and mutual trust creates an environment where team members feel valued and empowered to contribute their ideas and insights (Küllenberg et al., 2021).

However, systemic team coaching is not without its challenges. One of the primary drawbacks is that it can be time-intensive, requiring a significant commitment from both the coach and the team members (Gu, 2023). Additionally, resistance to change can pose a barrier, as team members may be hesitant to alter established behaviors and practices (Zhu et al., 2021). The complexity of systemic coaching also makes it difficult to measure its impact accurately, which can be a concern for organizations seeking tangible results (Louridas et al., 2021).

?

5. Criteria for Starting Systemic Team Coaching with Your Own Board Team

When considering the implementation of systemic team coaching within a boardroom team, several criteria should be established to ensure its success. First, it is essential to assess the current dynamics of the team, including existing relationships, communication patterns, and areas of conflict. This assessment will provide valuable insights into the specific needs of the team and inform the coaching process (Liu, 2024).

Second, establishing clear objectives for the coaching engagement is crucial. These objectives should align with the overall goals of the organization and address the unique challenges faced by the boardroom team. By setting measurable goals, organizations can track progress and evaluate the effectiveness of the coaching process (Lee et al., 2023).

Third, selecting a qualified systemic coach with experience in working with boardroom teams is vital. The coach should possess a deep understanding of organizational dynamics and the ability to facilitate discussions that promote trust and collaboration among team members (Hauser, 2014).

Finally, fostering a culture of openness and willingness to engage in the coaching process is essential. Team members must be committed to participating actively in the coaching sessions and be open to feedback and new perspectives (Goodwyn et al., 2022). By creating an environment conducive to learning and growth, organizations can maximize the benefits of systemic team coaching.

?

In conclusion, systemic team coaching plays a critical role in the development of boardroom teams by addressing both individual and collective dynamics within the broader organizational context. While there are alternative approaches to coaching, systemic coaching's holistic perspective and emphasis on real-time application make it a particularly effective option. Despite its challenges, the benefits of systemic coaching, including improved collaboration, stakeholder engagement, and sustainable change, underscore its value in fostering high-performing boardroom teams.

?

References:

1. Carter et al. "Since we are, therefore I am: Ubuntu and the experiences of Black women leadership coaches." Consulting psychology journal practice and research (2023) doi:10.1037/cpb0000227

2. Terblanche and Heyns "The impact of coachee personality traits, propensity to trust and perceived trustworthiness of a coach, on a coachee’s trust behaviour in a coaching relationship" Sa journal of industrial psychology (2020) doi:10.4102/sajip.v46i0.1707

3. Huynh et al. "Humble Coaches and Their Influence on Players and Teams: The Mediating Role of Affect-Based (but Not Cognition-Based) Trust" Psychological reports (2019) doi:10.1177/0033294119839028

4. Jowett et al. "The application of the 3+1Cs relationship model in executive coaching." Consulting psychology journal practice and research (2012) doi:10.1037/a0030316

5. Galey-Horn "Capacity-Building for District Reform: The Role of Instructional-Coach Teams" Teachers college record (2020) doi:10.1177/016146812012201003

6. Zuberbühler et al. "Coaching-Based Leadership Intervention Program: A Controlled Trial Study" Frontiers in psychology (2020) doi:10.3389/fpsyg.2019.03066

7. Bastable et al. "A Survey of Team Members’ Perceptions of Coaching Activities Related to Tier 1 SWPBIS Implementation" Journal of positive behavior interventions (2019) doi:10.1177/1098300719861566

8. Woo "Exploratory Study Examining the Joint Impacts of Mentoring and Managerial Coaching on Organizational Commitment" Sustainability (2017) doi:10.3390/su9020181

9. Terblanche "Coaching during a crisis: Organizational coaches' praxis adaptation during the initial stages of the Covid‐19 pandemic" Human resource development quarterly (2022) doi:10.1002/hrdq.21490

10. Min et al. "Systematic review of coaching to enhance surgeons' operative performance" Surgery (2015) doi:10.1016/j.surg.2015.03.007

11. Mcintosh et al. "Factors Predicting Sustained Implementation of a Universal Behavior Support Framework" Educational researcher (2018) doi:10.3102/0013189x18776975

12. Ben-Ahmed "Business coaching for Tunisian entrepreneurs: features and success factors" Global knowledge memory and communication (2020) doi:10.1108/gkmc-01-2019-0004

13. Haan et al. "Executive coaching outcome research: The contribution of common factors such as relationship, personality match, and self-efficacy." Consulting psychology journal practice and research (2013) doi:10.1037/a0031635

14. Woulfin "Mediating Instructional Reform: An Examination of the Relationship Between District Policy and Instructional Coaching" Aera open (2018) doi:10.1177/2332858418792278

15. Küllenberg et al. "The team leader coaching programme (TLCP) – a programme to implement team coaching in rehabilitation clinics – a feasibility study" Leadership in health services (2021) doi:10.1108/lhs-08-2020-0055

16. Gu "Association between coach-athlete relationship and athlete engagement in Chinese team sports: The mediating effect of thriving" Plos one (2023) doi:10.1371/journal.pone.0289979

17. Zhu et al. "Helping the Surgeon Recover: Peer-to-Peer Coaching after Bile Duct Injury" Journal of the american college of surgeons (2021) doi:10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2021.05.011

18. Louridas et al. "Coaching in Surgical Education" Annals of surgery open (2021) doi:10.1097/sla.0000000000004910

19. Hauser "Shape‐Shifting: A Behavioral Team Coaching Model for Coach Education, Research, and Practice" Journal of psychological issues in organizational culture (2014) doi:10.1002/jpoc.21144

20. Goodwyn et al. "Flying high: pilot peer coaching to champion well-being and mitigate hazardous attitudes" European journal of training and development (2022) doi:10.1108/ejtd-09-2021-0136

21. Beasley et al. "Strategies for Building Peer Surgical Coaching Relationships" Jama surgery (2017) doi:10.1001/jamasurg.2016.5540