The Role of Higher Education in Cultivating Good Citizens

The Role of Higher Education in Cultivating Good Citizens

Introduction

In today's politically and culturally divided landscape, the role of higher education in shaping responsible, empathetic, and engaged citizens has never been more critical. As a progressive dean, it's essential to underscore higher education institutions' historical context and contemporary responsibilities in fostering civic-minded individuals who can navigate and bridge these divides. This article explores the history and intent of higher education in developing good citizens, the skills necessary for this development, and the unique challenges and opportunities presented by generative AI.

Historical Context of Higher Education

Higher education in the United States has been intertwined with the ideals of republican self-government and civic duty (Rudolph, 1962). The nation's founders, including figures like Benjamin Rush and Thomas Jefferson, envisioned universities as crucibles for cultivating informed and engaged citizens capable of contributing to the republic's political and social welfare (Harkavy & Hartley, 2012). For instance, the Northwest Ordinance of 1787 emphasized that "schools and the means of education shall forever be encouraged" as they were deemed necessary for good government and the happiness of mankind (Rudolph, 1962, p. 41).

The Civic Role of Higher Education

The civic mission of higher education is multifaceted, aiming to develop students' skills in civil discourse, respect for diverse perspectives, inclusivity, authenticity, critical thinking, and communication (Colby et al., 2003). These skills are essential for deciphering good information from misinformation, building empathy, and working towards the greater good.

Critical Skills for Good Citizenship

1. Civil Discourse and Respect for Perspectives: Universities must create environments where students can engage in respectful and productive discussions, even when they disagree. This involves teaching students to listen actively, articulate their views clearly, and appreciate the validity of different perspectives (Hess & McAvoy, 2014).

2. Inclusivity and Authenticity: Higher education institutions should foster inclusive environments where all students feel valued and heard. This involves promoting diversity and creating spaces where students can be authentic without fear of discrimination or exclusion (Gurin et al., 2002).

3. Critical Thinking and Information Literacy: Critical thinking skills are paramount in an age of information overload and rampant misinformation. Students must learn to evaluate sources, discern credible information, and think critically about the information they encounter (Facione, 2015).

4. Communication and Persuasion: Effective communication is crucial for civic engagement. Students should be trained to articulate their ideas clearly and persuasively, whether in writing or speech. This includes telling authentic stories that resonate with diverse audiences and inspire action (Duarte, 2010).

5. Empathy and Emotional Intelligence: Building empathy involves understanding and sharing the feelings of others. Emotional intelligence helps students navigate social complexities and build solid and compassionate relationships (Goleman, 2006).

Challenges and Opportunities of Generative AI

Generative AI presents both opportunities and challenges for higher education's civic mission. On one hand, AI can enhance learning experiences by providing personalized educational content and facilitating innovative teaching methods. On the other hand, it can exacerbate divisions by spreading misinformation and deepfakes, which undermine democratic processes and trust in institutions (Aoun, 2017).

Addressing the Challenges

1. Educating for AI Literacy: Universities must equip students with the skills to evaluate AI-generated content critically. This includes understanding how AI works, recognizing its potential biases, and learning to verify the authenticity of information (Holmes et al., 2019).

2. Promoting the Ethical Use of AI: Institutions should foster discussions around the ethical use of AI in society. This involves exploring AI's implications for privacy, security, and democracy and encouraging students to consider these factors in their professional and personal lives (Floridi et al., 2018).

3. Leveraging AI for Civic Engagement: AI can enhance civic engagement by providing platforms for virtual town halls, facilitating access to public services, and enabling more effective communication between citizens and their representatives (Noveck, 2015).

The Path Forward

In a time of profound political and cultural division, higher education institutions must be more intentional than ever about preparing the next generation of public servants and engaged citizens. By focusing on developing critical civic skills and addressing the challenges posed by generative AI, universities can help bridge divides and foster a more inclusive, informed, and empathetic society (Levine & Dean, 2012).

As educational leaders, we must advocate for these values and practices within our institutions and beyond, ensuring that higher education continues to serve as a beacon of hope and progress in an increasingly complex world.

References

Aoun, J. E. (2017). Robot-proof: Higher education in the age of artificial intelligence. MIT Press.

Colby, A., Ehrlich, T., Beaumont, E., & Stephens, J. (2003). Educating citizens: Preparing America's undergraduates for lives of moral and civic responsibility. Jossey-Bass.

Duarte, N. (2010). Resonate: Present visual stories that transform audiences. John Wiley & Sons.

Facione, P. A. (2015). Critical thinking: What it is and why it counts. Insight Assessment.

Floridi, L., Cowls, J., Beltrametti, M., Chatila, R., Chazerand, P., Dignum, V., ... & Vayena, E. (2018). AI4People—An ethical framework for a good AI society: Opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations. Minds and Machines, 28(4), 689–707.

Goleman, D. (2006). Emotional intelligence. Bantam.

Gurin, P., Dey, E., Hurtado, S., & Gurin, G. (2002). Diversity and higher education: Theory and impact on educational outcomes. Harvard Educational Review, 72(3), 330–367.

Harkavy, I., & Hartley, M. (2012). Integrating a commitment to the public good into the institutional fabric: Further lessons from the field. Journal of Higher Education Outreach and Engagement, 16(4), 17–36.

Hess, D. E., & McAvoy, P. (2014). The political classroom: Evidence and ethics in democratic education. Routledge.

Holmes, W., Bialik, M., & Fadel, C. (2019). Artificial intelligence in education: Promises and implications for teaching and learning. Center for Curriculum Redesign.

Levine, A., & Dean, D. R. (2012). Generation on a tightrope: A portrait of today's college student. John Wiley & Sons.

Noveck, B. S. (2015). Smart citizens, smarter state: The technologies of expertise and the future of governing. Harvard University Press.

Perplexity AI. (2024). Perplexity AI (Version 1.0) [Large language model]. Perplexity AI.

Rudolph, F. (1962). The American college and university: A history. University of Georgia Press.

* I used my favorite AI tool (Perplexity) to help me organize my thoughts and sources. I am getting better and 'conversing' with my AI friend.

#highereducation

#generativeai

#citizenship