The Role and Challenges of Customs Authorities in Collecting Tax on Intangible Products
Dr. Ronnie (Rodrick) Van Rooyen
Author of Day-2-Day Customs / Professional Customs and Global Trade Advisor / PhD Maritime and Customs Management / PD International Business and Trade / Masters Degrees in Maritime Law and Maritime Economics
It is true that the world of global trade is constantly evolving and adapting to technologies, regulations and market dynamics. This is the reason I thought about how intangible products moving between countries have changed the world of Customs.
?
Introduction:
A few decades ago, Customs authorities focused on tangible products being imported and exported. However, these days the Customs landscape has changed, and we now have tangible and intangible products that cross country borders.
?
Definition of intangible products:
But what are intangible products? Intangible products refer to products that cannot be physically touched or seen. These may include for instance electronically transmitted products or carbon emissions.
?
Electronic transmitted products:
In terms of electronically transmitted products, with the rise of digital platforms, such as e-commerce websites and online service providers, intangible goods and services can now be easily bought and sold across borders without any physical presence. This has created challenges for tax authorities as traditional tax systems were primarily designed to capture tangible goods and physical transactions.
Carbon emissions:
And what about carbon emissions? Customs authorities face unique challenges when it comes to taxing carbon emissions as an intangible product. Unlike tangible goods, carbon emissions cannot be physically touched or seen, making it difficult to establish a clear framework for taxation. Additionally, measuring and monitoring carbon emissions at borders can be complex and requires advanced technology and expertise. With the growing urgency to address climate change, Customs authorities are exploring innovative approaches and collaborations to develop effective strategies for taxing carbon emissions, ensuring fair and sustainable practices in the digital economy.
?
Intangible products versus tangible products:
The growth of cross-border transactions involving intangible products has made it difficult for tax authorities to ensure that appropriate taxes are paid, and regulatory measures are enforced.
?
Unlike tangible products, intangible goods often do not have a physical presence that can be easily tracked or assessed for taxation purposes. This has led to a gap in tax collection and enforcement, potentially resulting in revenue losses for governments.
?
To address this challenge, there is a need to develop taxation mechanisms that can effectively capture and regulate intangible products in cross-border transactions.
?
Customs authorities, with their experience in tax collection and border control, are seen as well-placed to adapt their role and administer taxes on intangible products.
?
Considering how best to collect tax on intangible products:
Customs authorities can leverage their existing infrastructure and processes to effectively collect and monitor taxes on intangible products in cross-border transactions by implementing the following measures:
?
1. Strengthening data collection and analysis: Customs authorities can enhance their data collection systems to capture information related to intangible product, such as digital services. This includes collaborating with relevant stakeholders, such as digital platforms or service providers, to obtain accurate information on the transactions.
?
2. Developing electronic tracking systems: Customs authorities can establish electronic systems that enable the tracking and monitoring of intangible products in cross-border transactions. These systems can be integrated with existing customs processes to ensure efficient tax collection and enforcement.
?
3. Capacity building and training: Customs authorities may need to provide training and capacity building programmes to their staff to ensure they have the necessary skills and knowledge to effectively administer taxes on intangible products.
?
4. International cooperation: Customs authorities can collaborate with other customs agencies and international organizations to develop standardized approaches and guidelines for taxing intangible products in cross-border transactions. This can help streamline procedures and ensure consistency in tax collection practices. For example, a carbon tax may require that the Customs authority in the import country to work closely with the Customs authority in the country of export to ensure the tax is assessed on the correct amount of greenhouse gas emissions embedded in specific goods being exported to the import country.
?
领英推荐
Challenges faced in dealing with intangible products:
One of the biggest challenges dealing with intangible products is the gathering of accurate information related to intangible product transactions.
?
What needs to change in order for Customs authorities to play a facilitation role even with regard to intangible products?
?
Customs authorities should collaborate with digital platforms and service providers to gather accurate information on intangible product transactions through the following methods:
?
1. Data sharing agreements: Customs authorities can establish formal agreements with digital platforms and service providers to exchange information on intangible product transactions. These agreements can outline the specific data to be shared, the frequency of data sharing, and the protocols for ensuring data privacy and security.
?
2. API integration: Customs authorities can work with digital platforms and service providers to develop application programming interfaces (APIs) that allow for seamless data integration. This would enable Customs authorities to access real-time transaction data directly from the platforms, ensuring accurate and up-to-date information.
?
3. Reporting obligations: Customs authorities can require digital platforms and service providers to report specific details of intangible product transactions, such as the value of the transaction, the type of product or service involved, and the parties involved in the transaction. This reporting obligation can be enforced through legislation or regulations.
?
4. Audits and inspections: Customs authorities can conduct audits and inspections of digital platforms and service providers to verify the accuracy and completeness of the information they provide. This can help ensure compliance with tax regulations and deter potential tax evasion.
?
5. Collaboration platforms: Customs authorities can establish dedicated collaboration platforms or portals where digital platforms and service providers can securely submit transaction information. This centralized platform can streamline data collection processes and facilitate efficient communication between customs authorities and digital platforms.
?
Conclusion:
In conclusion, global trade is becoming increasingly interconnected and dynamic and although businesses must embrace these changes, so too Customs authorities.
?
To effectively deal with intangible products and collect relevant taxes while protecting local industries and promoting trade, Customs authorities need to adopt a comprehensive approach.
?
This approach should include, for instance, setting up clear guidelines and regulations specifically tailored for taxing intangible products. However, Customs authorities should also use technology and data analytics to accurately measure and monitor for example carbon emissions and electronic transmitted products.
?
In closing, Customs authorities need to find ways to tax intangible products effectively. They can do this by collaborating with experts and stakeholders and collaborating internationally to establish fair standards and talking with industries and governments to address concerns and find solutions that benefit everyone.
?
By taking these steps, Customs authorities can collect taxes, protect local industries, and promote economic growth covering tangible and intangible products.
?
Rodrick (Ronnie) van Rooyen (LLM Maritime Law and MPhil Maritime Studies)
?
?
?
?
?