Rob's Post and Courier Op Ed
Rob Young, PhD, PG
Director, Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines at Western Carolina University
Portions of Horry County are under water again. I think that it is safe to say that we now know where the most vulnerable properties in South Carolina lie. These are places like Bucksport, Star Creek, Rosewood, Smith, Roberta, West Oak, Folly, Riverside, Lee’s, Pitch, Bucksville, Savannah Bluff, North Conway, among others. There are folks in neighborhoods, like Rosewood, that have been waiting for promised buyouts since hurricane Florence in 2018. There are long-standing communities like Bucksport where residents wonder if they will be able to maintain the integrity of their neighborhoods, culture, and land that has been in extended families for generations.
Once again, the slow-moving disaster of Waccamaw and Little Pee Dee flooding has made access difficult to impossible and entered homes just enough to cause months to years worth of headaches for people who can’t afford this kind of burden. These are not giant, investment homes owned by folks from out of state. They are really “homes.” Flooding is a threat to livelihoods in many South Carolina counties that we still struggle to address.
I am a member of the South Carolina Floodwater Commission and I have also been working with Horry County as a part of a group hired to develop some resilience planning for the unincorporated portions of the County. As I watch the floodwaters rise, I can’t help but feel a very personal sense of failure. I looked people in the eye and said that I was there to help. Now, I can just sense the frustration with so-called experts like me. The frustration is justified. Yes, much of our work is geared towards the future and not the present, but the problems are here now.
There are no good solutions for reducing the flooding in the future. These systems are large and complex. The causes of this flooding are many, and they have gotten worse with increasing precipitation from changing climate. I spent all of my summers in Horry County as a boy. Not at the beach, but inland. I don’t remember having to deal with the kind of flooding the last 10 years has brought. Certainly, there weren’t as many homes in harm’s way, but there also just wasn’t as much water in the rivers.
If we can’t stop the flooding, then we must do two things: 1) we must help those who are suffering from repeat flooding to get out of harm’s way and find another living situation that makes them safer; and 2) we must not put any additional infrastructure in areas that we know are going to be underwater regularly. Seems simple, should be simple, but it is not.
In order to prevent future development in places that will flood, we need good maps that show us the risk. Most places rely primarily on the Federal Emergency Management Agency’s (FEMA) Flood Insurance Rate Maps (FIRMs) to understand exposure to flood hazards. They are an imperfect product for the task.
In Horry County, these maps greatly underestimate flood exposure in the upper parts of the watershed, where the measured flood elevations during Florence were 5 feet higher than what the FIRMs predicted for the A-Zone (the primary regulatory zone for flood insurance). In the lower parts of the watershed, the mapped flood zone is pretty good, but the risk estimate can be misleading. A mapped A-Zone suggests a 1% chance of flooding occurring in any given year (this is the predicted 100-year flood plain). Unfortunately, in many parts of Horry County this zone has been flooding almost annually.
At the Program for the Study of Developed Shorelines we have produced new, very detailed Supplemental Flood Maps for Horry County that will hopefully help guide a reduction in flood exposure for future development. These maps are based not on modeling, but on the where the flooding has actually occurred in the county. This is a unique product, and we were thrilled to work with County staff to complete it.
Still, there are hundreds of citizens in the communities mentioned above that are currently under water figuratively and literally. We need to streamline the flow of relief funds from the Federal Government through the State to the localities that need to help their citizens, NOW! The proposed cost of the buyouts for the Rosewood community is peanuts compared to the cost of a beach nourishment project, and buyouts represent a permanent solution. Folks who are ready to go should not have to flood two more times waiting.
Covid has shown us that things can happen quickly when we prioritize the need. Flooding in Horry County needs that kind of priority. I think I know where the new state resilience officer can get started.
Carthago Consultancy: Water management, Simulation and Serious Gaming, Scenario analysis
3 年Rob, again a vey good analysis! You do a remarkable job in telling the stories that need to be told!
Puget Sound Recovery Strategist @ Puget Sound Partnership. Coastal Policy & Planning Expert, Co-host of the American Shoreline Podcast; Publisher of Coastal News Today & American Shoreline Podcast Network.
3 年Very much appreciate the op-ed, Rob, from someone on the front lines who understands the daunting challenges of effectively responding to the flooding problem. Great topic for a podcast.