Risk Assessment Techniques in Process Safety and Learning from Historical Disasters

One of the key pillars of process safety is risk assessment — the systematic identification, analysis, and control of process hazards to prevent catastrophic failures that can endanger lives, harm the environment, and cause significant financial losses. Effective risk assessment techniques help organizations anticipate potential failures before they occur. Several major industrial disasters throughout history have been linked to inadequate or incomplete risk assessments. These incidents highlight the importance of adopting comprehensive and proactive risk assessment techniques to ensure that all potential hazards are identified and addressed. We need to learn & refresh our knowledge about #riskmanagement.

Hazard and Operability Study (#HAZOP): HAZOP is a structured and systematic technique used to identify potential hazards in process systems and to assess the operability issues that may arise from deviations in design and operation. It is based on brainstorming sessions involving multidisciplinary teams and focuses on examining how deviations from normal operating conditions could lead to hazardous situations.

What-If Analysis: What-If analysis is a brainstorming technique that explores hypothetical deviations from expected operations by asking "What if?" scenarios. ?It examines the possible consequences of these deviations and helps identify necessary safeguards or improvements.

Failure Mode and Effects Analysis (#FMEA): FMEA is a methodical approach that identifies potential failure modes within a system and evaluates their effects on operations. It also assesses the likelihood of occurrence, detectability, and severity of these failures to prioritize actions for risk mitigation.

Layers of Protection Analysis (#LOPA): LOPA is a semi-quantitative method used to assess the adequacy of safety barriers or layers of protection between a hazard and its potential consequences. LOPA helps evaluate whether existing safeguards are sufficient to reduce the risk to an acceptable level.

Bow-Tie Analysis: Bow-tie analysis is a risk assessment tool that visualizes the relationship between potential causes of a hazardous event, the preventive controls in place to stop the event from occurring, and the mitigation measures designed to minimize the impact if the event does occur.

Quantitative Risk Assessment (#QRA): QRA is a mathematical approach that quantifies the likelihood and consequences of potential hazardous events. It uses statistical data, modeling tools, and probabilistic techniques to provide an estimate of risk, allowing decision-makers to evaluate whether the risk is acceptable or if further mitigation measures are needed.?

Historical Examples of Poor Risk Assessment

Several major industrial disasters throughout history have been linked to inadequate or incomplete risk assessments. These incidents highlight the importance of adopting comprehensive and proactive risk assessment techniques to ensure that all potential hazards are identified and addressed. Few notable examples are discussed here:

Texas City Refinery Explosion: A hydrocarbon vapor cloud ignited at the BP Texas City Refinery, causing a massive explosion that killed 15 workers and injured over 180 others. A #HAZOP was conducted, but it failed to adequately identify the risks associated with the startup procedure, which led to overfilling the raffinate splitter tower. Additionally, safety alarms and critical instruments had been disabled, and management failed to implement lessons from previous incidents. This #disaster highlighted the importance of ensuring risk assessments should be thorough and address both human factors and equipment reliability. It also reinforced the need for continuous monitoring of safety-critical systems.

Deepwater Horizon Blowout: The explosion on the Deepwater Horizon offshore drilling platform resulted in the largest marine oil spill in history, with 11 fatalities and significant environmental damage. Poor risk assessment during the design and testing of the well’s blowout preventer (BOP) contributed to the disaster. The decision to proceed with operations despite warning signs (e.g., pressure discrepancies) reflected a breakdown in hazard recognition and risk mitigation. This incident underlined the need for robust risk assessments that consider worst-case scenarios and ensure the functionality of safety barriers, especially in high-risk environments like offshore drilling.

Bhopal Gas Tragedy: The accidental release of methyl isocyanate gas from a Union Carbide pesticide plant in Bhopal, India, caused the deaths of over 3,000 people, with tens of thousands more injured. Inadequate hazard identification, poor maintenance of safety systems, and a lack of proper emergency response measures all contributed to the scale of the disaster. Critical warning systems were inoperative, and the risk of a runaway reaction had not been adequately addressed. Bhopal emphasized the importance of comprehensive risk assessments for highly hazardous substances, along with strong safety management systems, effective maintenance, and emergency preparedness.

Piper Alpha Oil Platform Explosion: A gas leak on the Piper Alpha oil platform in the North Sea triggered a series of explosions and fires, killing 167 workers. The risk assessment conducted for maintenance activities failed to properly identify the risk of a gas leak during operations. Critical safety systems, including deluge systems, were also offline during the incident. This disaster demonstrated the importance of real-time risk assessments during maintenance and operational activities. It also highlighted the need for continuous readiness of safety systems in high-risk environments like offshore platforms.

These examples (above) highlight the critical role that thorough and effective risk assessment techniques play in preventing process safety incidents. Comprehensive risk assessments, such as HAZOP, LOPA, and QRA, must be employed rigorously and continuously to identify hazards and mitigate risks at every stage of an facility’s lifecycle. Moreover, the lessons learned from past disasters should drive continuous improvement in safety practices, ensuring that similar incidents are avoided in the future. A proactive approach to risk management not only saves lives but also protects the environment and preserves the financial health of organizations.

?Comments are welcomed to share the learnings in your environment.

Reach us: [email protected]; www.blackswanpk.com; +92 326 902 9022