The Rise of AI Sustainability Metrics: Carburacy Score and Beyond

Artificial intelligence is advancing at a breathtaking pace, transforming industries from healthcare to finance. But behind the promise of automation, efficiency, and innovation lies a growing concern—the staggering environmental cost of AI.

Every time a complex AI model is trained, it consumes massive amounts of electricity, often generated from fossil fuels. Data centers powering these AI systems already account for around 2% of global electricity consumption, and this number is projected to more than double by 2026. Large-scale AI models, particularly deep learning systems, can emit hundreds of metric tons of CO? in a single training cycle.

The scale of this impact has prompted researchers, tech companies, and policymakers to ask an important question: How do we ensure that AI remains a force for good without accelerating the climate crisis?

This has led to the rise of AI sustainability metrics, tools designed to measure and manage the carbon footprint of artificial intelligence. Among these, the Carburacy Score stands out as a pioneering approach that evaluates not just AI’s performance but also its environmental footprint.

Understanding how AI sustainability scores work—and why they matter—will be critical for shaping the future of responsible AI development.

The Hidden Environmental Cost of AI

To understand why AI sustainability metrics are gaining traction, it helps to first grasp why AI’s energy consumption has become a growing concern.

Consider this: training an advanced AI model like OpenAI’s GPT-4 or Google’s Gemini requires thousands of high-powered GPUs running continuously for weeks. These GPUs consume vast amounts of electricity, often in data centers powered by non-renewable energy sources.

Beyond electricity, AI’s environmental impact extends to water consumption. Cooling AI data centers requires billions of liters of water, a resource already under strain in many parts of the world. Some estimates suggest AI’s water footprint could reach 6.6 billion cubic meters annually by 2027, exacerbating water scarcity.

The problem is clear: AI is energy-intensive, and as its applications grow, so does its environmental toll. Yet, for a long time, AI development focused almost exclusively on performance—how fast and accurately a model could process information—without considering its carbon footprint.

Now, as awareness of AI’s climate impact spreads, sustainability is becoming a key factor in how AI models are assessed and built.

The Carburacy Score: A Smarter Way to Measure AI’s Impact

In response to AI’s growing carbon footprint, a team of researchers—G. Moro, Luca Ragazzi, and Lorenzo Valgimigli—introduced the Carburacy Score at the AAAI Conference in 2023. Unlike traditional AI benchmarks that only measure accuracy and efficiency, Carburacy offers a dual assessment, evaluating:

1. Effectiveness – How well the AI performs on a given task (e.g., accuracy, robustness, efficiency).
2. Environmental Impact – The energy consumption and carbon emissions associated with training and running the model.

The idea behind Carburacy is simple yet profound: technological progress shouldn’t come at an excessive environmental cost. AI models that deliver higher accuracy but require significantly more energy should not be considered better without factoring in their sustainability impact.

To calculate Carburacy, researchers analyze multiple factors, including:

• Model optimization – How efficiently an AI model is designed.
• Hardware efficiency – The energy consumption of GPUs and AI chips used in training.
• Cloud vs. on-premise deployment – The carbon footprint of different computing environments.
• Energy sources – Whether the data center training the AI model is powered by renewable energy or fossil fuels.

In essence, Carburacy works much like a fuel efficiency rating for AI—helping researchers, businesses, and policymakers identify models that strike a balance between performance and sustainability.

Read more about this here:

A Growing Ecosystem of AI Sustainability Metrics

While Carburacy is a promising step forward, it is just one of several emerging tools designed to measure AI’s environmental impact.

• AI Energy Score – Developed by Salesforce & Hugging Face in 2024, this metric ranks AI models based on energy consumption, helping developers choose lower-energy alternatives.
• Green Algorithms Framework – Created by MIT researchers in 2021, this tool calculates the carbon footprint of AI training based on location, hardware, and efficiency.
• ML CO? Impact (Google, 2022) – Integrated into Google Cloud AI services, this tool tracks the emissions of AI workloads and suggests ways to reduce them.
• CodeCarbon (2021) – An open-source software that monitors real-time energy consumption of AI models, enabling engineers to optimize efficiency.

Together, these initiatives represent a significant shift in the AI industry—one that moves beyond blind technological progress toward responsible, sustainable innovation.

Why AI Sustainability Scores Matter

The rise of AI sustainability metrics isn’t just a niche academic concern. It is shaping corporate strategies, government regulations, and investment decisions worldwide.

Corporate Action: A Shift Toward Green AI

Leading tech companies are already adopting sustainability strategies to improve AI efficiency and reduce emissions:

• Microsoft has begun experimenting with liquid cooling in data centers to reduce energy waste.
• Google is working toward powering its AI operations entirely with renewable energy.
• Amazon is integrating edge computing to cut down on energy losses from data transmission.

For companies that rely on AI, adopting sustainability metrics is becoming a competitive advantage. Consumers, investors, and regulators are increasingly looking at how businesses manage their AI-related carbon footprint.

Government Regulations: A New Era of Accountability

Policymakers worldwide are also beginning to address AI’s environmental footprint through regulations and incentives:

• The EU’s Climate Neutral Data Centre Pact aims to make AI-powered data centers carbon neutral by 2030.
• The US Renewable Energy Tax Credits provide incentives for AI firms that shift to renewable-powered data centers.
• China’s Green AI Policy places strict limitations on energy-intensive AI operations.

As governments tighten regulations, AI companies that fail to integrate sustainability considerations may face financial penalties, reputational damage, or operational restrictions.

Investment Trends: AI’s ESG Factor

The financial world is also paying close attention. Investors are now factoring AI sustainability metrics into their environmental, social, and governance (ESG) assessments.

Companies that prioritize AI efficiency and sustainability may soon enjoy higher valuations, better funding opportunities, and stronger consumer trust.

The Future of AI Sustainability Metrics

AI will only become more powerful and more energy-intensive in the coming years. The real question isn’t whether AI will face sustainability regulations—it’s how soon and how strict those regulations will be.

Future trends in AI sustainability could include:

• AI Carbon Labeling – AI products might soon be required to display their energy consumption and carbon emissions, much like food labels display nutrition facts.
• Stricter Emission Caps – Governments could impose limits on the carbon footprint of AI models.
• AI for AI Efficiency – AI may be used to optimize its own computing processes, reducing waste and improving efficiency.
• Consumer Awareness – Businesses that adopt AI sustainability scores could market their lower-carbon AI models as a selling point.

The future of AI is not just about intelligence—it’s about responsibility. By embracing sustainability metrics today, we can ensure that AI remains a powerful tool for progress without becoming a burden on the planet.

A Call for Responsible AI Development

AI’s environmental impact can no longer be ignored. The industry must evolve—not just in terms of capability, but in terms of sustainability.

By measuring AI’s carbon footprint, optimizing model efficiency, and ensuring transparency in AI energy use, we can build a future where technology advances human potential without compromising planetary health.

This article was developed in collaboration with AI assistance. Topics, nuanced insights, and data were carefully curated and contributed by me, Jogitha, to ensure accuracy, relevance, and depth.